Kim Jørgensen, Birgitte Lerbæk, Jesper Frederiksen, Emma Watson, Bengt Karlsson
{"title":"患者参与精神健康护理--医护人员和患者的观点:范围界定综述》。","authors":"Kim Jørgensen, Birgitte Lerbæk, Jesper Frederiksen, Emma Watson, Bengt Karlsson","doi":"10.1080/01612840.2024.2358931","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>This scoping review aims to synthesize findings from fourteen selected articles to provide a comprehensive understanding of patient participation in mental healthcare.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>The review analyzed articles employing various qualitative methodologies, including interviews and observations, to explore patient and healthcare professional perspectives. Articles were selected based on their relevance to the topic of patient participation in mental health care.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The analysis revealed diverse perspectives on patient participation. Patients' preferences varied, with some preferring shared decision-making while others preferred minimal involvement. Barriers to shared decision-making included fear of judgment and substance misuse concerns. Strategies to manage disagreements and foster trusting relationships were identified. Challenges in implementing patient and public involvement in mental health services were noted, including stigma and inadequate professional training. Interprofessional collaboration was deemed fundamental, although fragmented care pathways and communication breakdowns persisted. Structural conditions and professional expectations significantly influenced patient participation, with a paternalistic approach perpetuating power imbalances.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Despite challenges, the findings underscored the importance of empowering patients in treatment decision-making, promoting collaborative relationships, and addressing barriers to enhance patient-centered care in mental health settings. Insights from this review contribute to the discourse on patient-centered care, emphasizing the need for holistic approaches prioritizing patient dignity and well-being.</p>","PeriodicalId":14664,"journal":{"name":"Issues in Mental Health Nursing","volume":" ","pages":"794-810"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Patient Participation in Mental Health Care - Perspectives of Healthcare Professionals and Patients: A Scoping Review.\",\"authors\":\"Kim Jørgensen, Birgitte Lerbæk, Jesper Frederiksen, Emma Watson, Bengt Karlsson\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/01612840.2024.2358931\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>This scoping review aims to synthesize findings from fourteen selected articles to provide a comprehensive understanding of patient participation in mental healthcare.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>The review analyzed articles employing various qualitative methodologies, including interviews and observations, to explore patient and healthcare professional perspectives. Articles were selected based on their relevance to the topic of patient participation in mental health care.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The analysis revealed diverse perspectives on patient participation. Patients' preferences varied, with some preferring shared decision-making while others preferred minimal involvement. Barriers to shared decision-making included fear of judgment and substance misuse concerns. Strategies to manage disagreements and foster trusting relationships were identified. Challenges in implementing patient and public involvement in mental health services were noted, including stigma and inadequate professional training. Interprofessional collaboration was deemed fundamental, although fragmented care pathways and communication breakdowns persisted. Structural conditions and professional expectations significantly influenced patient participation, with a paternalistic approach perpetuating power imbalances.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Despite challenges, the findings underscored the importance of empowering patients in treatment decision-making, promoting collaborative relationships, and addressing barriers to enhance patient-centered care in mental health settings. Insights from this review contribute to the discourse on patient-centered care, emphasizing the need for holistic approaches prioritizing patient dignity and well-being.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14664,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Issues in Mental Health Nursing\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"794-810\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Issues in Mental Health Nursing\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/01612840.2024.2358931\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/6/20 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"NURSING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Issues in Mental Health Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/01612840.2024.2358931","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/6/20 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
Patient Participation in Mental Health Care - Perspectives of Healthcare Professionals and Patients: A Scoping Review.
Aim: This scoping review aims to synthesize findings from fourteen selected articles to provide a comprehensive understanding of patient participation in mental healthcare.
Method: The review analyzed articles employing various qualitative methodologies, including interviews and observations, to explore patient and healthcare professional perspectives. Articles were selected based on their relevance to the topic of patient participation in mental health care.
Results: The analysis revealed diverse perspectives on patient participation. Patients' preferences varied, with some preferring shared decision-making while others preferred minimal involvement. Barriers to shared decision-making included fear of judgment and substance misuse concerns. Strategies to manage disagreements and foster trusting relationships were identified. Challenges in implementing patient and public involvement in mental health services were noted, including stigma and inadequate professional training. Interprofessional collaboration was deemed fundamental, although fragmented care pathways and communication breakdowns persisted. Structural conditions and professional expectations significantly influenced patient participation, with a paternalistic approach perpetuating power imbalances.
Conclusion: Despite challenges, the findings underscored the importance of empowering patients in treatment decision-making, promoting collaborative relationships, and addressing barriers to enhance patient-centered care in mental health settings. Insights from this review contribute to the discourse on patient-centered care, emphasizing the need for holistic approaches prioritizing patient dignity and well-being.
期刊介绍:
Issues in Mental Health Nursing is a refereed journal designed to expand psychiatric and mental health nursing knowledge. It deals with new, innovative approaches to client care, in-depth analysis of current issues, and empirical research. Because clinical research is the primary vehicle for the development of nursing science, the journal presents data-based articles on nursing care provision to clients of all ages in a variety of community and institutional settings. Additionally, the journal publishes theoretical papers and manuscripts addressing mental health promotion, public policy concerns, and educational preparation of mental health nurses. International contributions are welcomed.