Alessia Celeste Bocchino, Esaú Fernández-Pascual, Carlos Toribio-Vázquez, Celeste Manfredi, Guillermo Urdaneta, Carlos Balmori, Enrique Lledó, Claudio Martínez-Ballesteros, Andrea Cocci, Nicola Mondaini, Juan Ignacio Martínez-Salamanca
{"title":"用于成人包皮环切术的两种一次性包皮环切缝合器的有效性和安全性:一项前瞻性多中心比较研究。","authors":"Alessia Celeste Bocchino, Esaú Fernández-Pascual, Carlos Toribio-Vázquez, Celeste Manfredi, Guillermo Urdaneta, Carlos Balmori, Enrique Lledó, Claudio Martínez-Ballesteros, Andrea Cocci, Nicola Mondaini, Juan Ignacio Martínez-Salamanca","doi":"10.1038/s41443-024-00933-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The objective of this study was to evaluate and compare efficacy and safety of two different Disposable circumcision suture devices (DCSDs). A prospective comparative non-randomized multicenter study was performed between November 2019 and February 2023. Patients underwent circumcision using a DCSD (CircCurer<sup>TM</sup> or the ZSR<sup>®</sup> device) according to the surgeon preference and device availability. A total of 378 patients were circumcised; 184 using CircCurer<sup>TM</sup> and 194 patients using ZSR<sup>®</sup>. No differences in baseline characteristics were observed. CircCurer and ZSR Groups showed similar rates of operative time (7.7 ±2.1 vs 7.3 ±2.0 min), surgical site infection (1.1% Vs 1.5%), edema (13% Vs 8.2%), hematomas (2.7% Vs 1.1%), and postoperative pain (2.5 Vs 2.0 points). ZSR Group had a significantly higher rate of clip fallout (62.9% Vs 38%, p < 0.001). At 2 months, patients of both groups reported a median satisfaction of 9 (8-9) points. Main limitation consist in non-randomized study. DCSDs seem to be effective and safe, with short operative times, uncommon and mild complications, and high patient satisfaction. ZSR<sup>®</sup> device has a higher rate of spontaneous staple dropout.</p>","PeriodicalId":14068,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Impotence Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Efficacy and safety of two disposable circumcision suture devices for circumcision in adults: a prospective comparative multicenter study.\",\"authors\":\"Alessia Celeste Bocchino, Esaú Fernández-Pascual, Carlos Toribio-Vázquez, Celeste Manfredi, Guillermo Urdaneta, Carlos Balmori, Enrique Lledó, Claudio Martínez-Ballesteros, Andrea Cocci, Nicola Mondaini, Juan Ignacio Martínez-Salamanca\",\"doi\":\"10.1038/s41443-024-00933-3\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The objective of this study was to evaluate and compare efficacy and safety of two different Disposable circumcision suture devices (DCSDs). A prospective comparative non-randomized multicenter study was performed between November 2019 and February 2023. Patients underwent circumcision using a DCSD (CircCurer<sup>TM</sup> or the ZSR<sup>®</sup> device) according to the surgeon preference and device availability. A total of 378 patients were circumcised; 184 using CircCurer<sup>TM</sup> and 194 patients using ZSR<sup>®</sup>. No differences in baseline characteristics were observed. CircCurer and ZSR Groups showed similar rates of operative time (7.7 ±2.1 vs 7.3 ±2.0 min), surgical site infection (1.1% Vs 1.5%), edema (13% Vs 8.2%), hematomas (2.7% Vs 1.1%), and postoperative pain (2.5 Vs 2.0 points). ZSR Group had a significantly higher rate of clip fallout (62.9% Vs 38%, p < 0.001). At 2 months, patients of both groups reported a median satisfaction of 9 (8-9) points. Main limitation consist in non-randomized study. DCSDs seem to be effective and safe, with short operative times, uncommon and mild complications, and high patient satisfaction. ZSR<sup>®</sup> device has a higher rate of spontaneous staple dropout.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14068,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Impotence Research\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Impotence Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41443-024-00933-3\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Impotence Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41443-024-00933-3","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Efficacy and safety of two disposable circumcision suture devices for circumcision in adults: a prospective comparative multicenter study.
The objective of this study was to evaluate and compare efficacy and safety of two different Disposable circumcision suture devices (DCSDs). A prospective comparative non-randomized multicenter study was performed between November 2019 and February 2023. Patients underwent circumcision using a DCSD (CircCurerTM or the ZSR® device) according to the surgeon preference and device availability. A total of 378 patients were circumcised; 184 using CircCurerTM and 194 patients using ZSR®. No differences in baseline characteristics were observed. CircCurer and ZSR Groups showed similar rates of operative time (7.7 ±2.1 vs 7.3 ±2.0 min), surgical site infection (1.1% Vs 1.5%), edema (13% Vs 8.2%), hematomas (2.7% Vs 1.1%), and postoperative pain (2.5 Vs 2.0 points). ZSR Group had a significantly higher rate of clip fallout (62.9% Vs 38%, p < 0.001). At 2 months, patients of both groups reported a median satisfaction of 9 (8-9) points. Main limitation consist in non-randomized study. DCSDs seem to be effective and safe, with short operative times, uncommon and mild complications, and high patient satisfaction. ZSR® device has a higher rate of spontaneous staple dropout.
期刊介绍:
International Journal of Impotence Research: The Journal of Sexual Medicine addresses sexual medicine for both genders as an interdisciplinary field. This includes basic science researchers, urologists, endocrinologists, cardiologists, family practitioners, gynecologists, internists, neurologists, psychiatrists, psychologists, radiologists and other health care clinicians.