了解有助于制定合作性心理方案的因素:定性系统回顾。

IF 3.2 3区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL
Naomi E. Thrower, Katherine Berry, Isobel Johnston, Lydia Morris
{"title":"了解有助于制定合作性心理方案的因素:定性系统回顾。","authors":"Naomi E. Thrower,&nbsp;Katherine Berry,&nbsp;Isobel Johnston,&nbsp;Lydia Morris","doi":"10.1002/cpp.2998","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objectives</h3>\n \n <p>Creating a formulation is one of the key competencies of a clinical psychologist and is understood to be important for guiding therapeutic input and understanding client distress. However, client experience of formulations can vary, with some reporting it is unhelpful and distressing. This novel review explores the experiences of clinicians and clients when creating a formulation, specifically the barriers and facilitators to collaborating on a formulation. This ultimately aims to improve client experience and engagement in formulation.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>A systematic search of PubMed, Web of Science, PsycINFO and EMBASE was conducted using PRISMA guidelines. The protocol was registered on PROSPERO. This search was conducted using terms related to ‘psychological formulation’ and ‘experience’. Nineteen qualitative papers met inclusion criteria and were appraised using the Critical Appraisal Skills Programme. Findings that pertained to formulation were thematically synthesised.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Three analytical themes were identified: toleration of the formulation process—‘a necessary evil’, which highlights the potential emotional impact of formulation on the client and indicates the importance of responding to client readiness and expectations of formulation; development of the therapeutic relationship—‘it's like a two way thing, isn't it?’, which suggests that client empowerment, adapting to client needs and clinicians creating a safe and containing environment facilitated the formulation process; systemic factors—‘walking a tightrope’, which highlights the constraints of resources and team dynamics in therapists' ability to engage in collaborative formulation.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>Facilitators to a collaborative formulation include the following: simple formulations, thorough assessment and preparation for formulation, ‘doing with’ activities such as timelines and diagrams and working environments that include supportive colleagues and time for reflection and training.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":10460,"journal":{"name":"Clinical psychology & psychotherapy","volume":"31 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/cpp.2998","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Understanding the Factors That Contribute to Creating a Collaborative Psychological Formulation: A Qualitative Systematic Review\",\"authors\":\"Naomi E. Thrower,&nbsp;Katherine Berry,&nbsp;Isobel Johnston,&nbsp;Lydia Morris\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/cpp.2998\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Objectives</h3>\\n \\n <p>Creating a formulation is one of the key competencies of a clinical psychologist and is understood to be important for guiding therapeutic input and understanding client distress. However, client experience of formulations can vary, with some reporting it is unhelpful and distressing. This novel review explores the experiences of clinicians and clients when creating a formulation, specifically the barriers and facilitators to collaborating on a formulation. This ultimately aims to improve client experience and engagement in formulation.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>A systematic search of PubMed, Web of Science, PsycINFO and EMBASE was conducted using PRISMA guidelines. The protocol was registered on PROSPERO. This search was conducted using terms related to ‘psychological formulation’ and ‘experience’. Nineteen qualitative papers met inclusion criteria and were appraised using the Critical Appraisal Skills Programme. Findings that pertained to formulation were thematically synthesised.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>Three analytical themes were identified: toleration of the formulation process—‘a necessary evil’, which highlights the potential emotional impact of formulation on the client and indicates the importance of responding to client readiness and expectations of formulation; development of the therapeutic relationship—‘it's like a two way thing, isn't it?’, which suggests that client empowerment, adapting to client needs and clinicians creating a safe and containing environment facilitated the formulation process; systemic factors—‘walking a tightrope’, which highlights the constraints of resources and team dynamics in therapists' ability to engage in collaborative formulation.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\\n \\n <p>Facilitators to a collaborative formulation include the following: simple formulations, thorough assessment and preparation for formulation, ‘doing with’ activities such as timelines and diagrams and working environments that include supportive colleagues and time for reflection and training.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10460,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical psychology & psychotherapy\",\"volume\":\"31 3\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/cpp.2998\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical psychology & psychotherapy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/cpp.2998\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical psychology & psychotherapy","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/cpp.2998","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:制定治疗方案是临床心理学家的关键能力之一,对于指导治疗投入和了解客户的痛苦非常重要。然而,求助者对配方的体验可能各不相同,有些求助者表示配方无益且令人苦恼。这篇新颖的综述探讨了临床医生和客户在制定配方时的体验,特别是合作制定配方的障碍和促进因素。其最终目的是改善客户在配方设计中的体验和参与度:采用 PRISMA 指南对 PubMed、Web of Science、PsycINFO 和 EMBASE 进行了系统检索。该方案已在 PROSPERO 上注册。该检索使用了与 "心理治疗 "和 "经验 "相关的术语。19篇定性论文符合纳入标准,并使用批判性评估技能计划进行了评估。对与配方有关的研究结果进行了专题综合:结果:确定了三个分析主题:对配制过程的容忍--"必要之恶",这强调了配制对求助者的潜在情绪影响,并表明了对求助者的准备情况和对配制的期望做出回应的重要性;治疗关系的发展--这就像是一个双向的事情,不是吗?这表明,客户授权、适应客户需求以及临床医生创造一个安全、包容的环境有利于配方过程;系统因素--"走钢丝",这强调了资源和团队动力对治疗师参与合作配方能力的限制:结论:促进协作式治疗的因素包括:简单的治疗方案、全面的评估和治疗前的准备、"一起做 "的活动,如时间轴和图表,以及包括支持性同事和反思与培训时间在内的工作环境。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Understanding the Factors That Contribute to Creating a Collaborative Psychological Formulation: A Qualitative Systematic Review

Understanding the Factors That Contribute to Creating a Collaborative Psychological Formulation: A Qualitative Systematic Review

Objectives

Creating a formulation is one of the key competencies of a clinical psychologist and is understood to be important for guiding therapeutic input and understanding client distress. However, client experience of formulations can vary, with some reporting it is unhelpful and distressing. This novel review explores the experiences of clinicians and clients when creating a formulation, specifically the barriers and facilitators to collaborating on a formulation. This ultimately aims to improve client experience and engagement in formulation.

Methods

A systematic search of PubMed, Web of Science, PsycINFO and EMBASE was conducted using PRISMA guidelines. The protocol was registered on PROSPERO. This search was conducted using terms related to ‘psychological formulation’ and ‘experience’. Nineteen qualitative papers met inclusion criteria and were appraised using the Critical Appraisal Skills Programme. Findings that pertained to formulation were thematically synthesised.

Results

Three analytical themes were identified: toleration of the formulation process—‘a necessary evil’, which highlights the potential emotional impact of formulation on the client and indicates the importance of responding to client readiness and expectations of formulation; development of the therapeutic relationship—‘it's like a two way thing, isn't it?’, which suggests that client empowerment, adapting to client needs and clinicians creating a safe and containing environment facilitated the formulation process; systemic factors—‘walking a tightrope’, which highlights the constraints of resources and team dynamics in therapists' ability to engage in collaborative formulation.

Conclusion

Facilitators to a collaborative formulation include the following: simple formulations, thorough assessment and preparation for formulation, ‘doing with’ activities such as timelines and diagrams and working environments that include supportive colleagues and time for reflection and training.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Clinical psychology & psychotherapy
Clinical psychology & psychotherapy PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL-
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
5.60%
发文量
106
期刊介绍: Clinical Psychology & Psychotherapy aims to keep clinical psychologists and psychotherapists up to date with new developments in their fields. The Journal will provide an integrative impetus both between theory and practice and between different orientations within clinical psychology and psychotherapy. Clinical Psychology & Psychotherapy will be a forum in which practitioners can present their wealth of expertise and innovations in order to make these available to a wider audience. Equally, the Journal will contain reports from researchers who want to address a larger clinical audience with clinically relevant issues and clinically valid research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信