粘接技术和粘接剂厚度对种植体支持修复体的固位和多余粘接剂量的影响

IF 1.7 Q3 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
{"title":"粘接技术和粘接剂厚度对种植体支持修复体的固位和多余粘接剂量的影响","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.sdentj.2024.06.018","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><p>To assess the amount of excess cement and the retentive strengths of two different cementation techniques (conventional cementation and practice abutment) using copings fabricated with three different cement thicknesses (20 μm, 35 μm, and 50 μm).</p></div><div><h3>Materials and methods</h3><p>Thirty zirconia copings were fabricated on screw retained abutments and randomly divided into three equal groups (n = 10) according to the cement thickness (20 μm, 35 μm, and 50 μm). Each group was cemented with tow cementation techniques. Cementation was performed with provisional cement (Temp-Bond). In the conventional cementation technique, cement was applied until each coping was approximately half filled, and the copings were subsequently placed on the implant–abutment assembly. Then, the copings were cleaned and cemented using the practice abutment cementation technique to remove excess cement prior to the process. Each technique was performed using copings with three different cement thicknesses (20 μm, 35 μm, and 50 μm). The specimens with the cemented copings were weighed on a high-precision analytical balance before and after removing the extruded cement, and the differences between the two measurements were calculated. Then, each specimen was subjected to a pullout test using a universal testing machine. The load required to dislodge the coping was recorded. The data were analyzed using two-way and one-way analysis of variance and independent sample t tests at a significance level of 0.05.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The highest retention values were obtained for 20 μm cement thickness in the conventional technique and the practice abutment cementation technique. The amount of excess cement was the highest for the 50 μm cement thickness obtained for both cementation techniques, whereas the lowest mean values were recorded for the 20 μm cement thickness.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>The conventional cementation technique is recommended over the practice abutment technique to increase the retention of crowns cemented with provisional cement. However, care must be taken to remove the extruded cement. A cement thickness of 20 μm is preferable for enhancing the retention of cemented crowns and for reducing the amount of excess cement when applying both conventional and practical abutment cementation approaches.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":47246,"journal":{"name":"Saudi Dental Journal","volume":"36 9","pages":"Pages 1203-1208"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1013905224001950/pdfft?md5=d6a36f8957f05f5364bed53a9eef028c&pid=1-s2.0-S1013905224001950-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effects of cementation technique and cement thickness on the retention and amount of excess cement in implant-supported restorations\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.sdentj.2024.06.018\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><p>To assess the amount of excess cement and the retentive strengths of two different cementation techniques (conventional cementation and practice abutment) using copings fabricated with three different cement thicknesses (20 μm, 35 μm, and 50 μm).</p></div><div><h3>Materials and methods</h3><p>Thirty zirconia copings were fabricated on screw retained abutments and randomly divided into three equal groups (n = 10) according to the cement thickness (20 μm, 35 μm, and 50 μm). Each group was cemented with tow cementation techniques. Cementation was performed with provisional cement (Temp-Bond). In the conventional cementation technique, cement was applied until each coping was approximately half filled, and the copings were subsequently placed on the implant–abutment assembly. Then, the copings were cleaned and cemented using the practice abutment cementation technique to remove excess cement prior to the process. Each technique was performed using copings with three different cement thicknesses (20 μm, 35 μm, and 50 μm). The specimens with the cemented copings were weighed on a high-precision analytical balance before and after removing the extruded cement, and the differences between the two measurements were calculated. Then, each specimen was subjected to a pullout test using a universal testing machine. The load required to dislodge the coping was recorded. The data were analyzed using two-way and one-way analysis of variance and independent sample t tests at a significance level of 0.05.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The highest retention values were obtained for 20 μm cement thickness in the conventional technique and the practice abutment cementation technique. The amount of excess cement was the highest for the 50 μm cement thickness obtained for both cementation techniques, whereas the lowest mean values were recorded for the 20 μm cement thickness.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>The conventional cementation technique is recommended over the practice abutment technique to increase the retention of crowns cemented with provisional cement. However, care must be taken to remove the extruded cement. A cement thickness of 20 μm is preferable for enhancing the retention of cemented crowns and for reducing the amount of excess cement when applying both conventional and practical abutment cementation approaches.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47246,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Saudi Dental Journal\",\"volume\":\"36 9\",\"pages\":\"Pages 1203-1208\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1013905224001950/pdfft?md5=d6a36f8957f05f5364bed53a9eef028c&pid=1-s2.0-S1013905224001950-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Saudi Dental Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1013905224001950\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Saudi Dental Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1013905224001950","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

材料和方法在螺钉固位基台上制作 30 个氧化锆基台,并根据骨水泥厚度(20 μm、35 μm 和 50 μm)随机分为三个相同的组(n = 10)。每组均采用毛巾固位技术进行固位。使用临时骨水泥(Temp-Bond)进行固位。在传统的粘结技术中,粘结剂涂抹到每个基台的一半左右,然后将基台放置到种植体-基台组件上。然后,使用实践基台固位技术清洁并固位基台,以去除多余的固位材料。每种技术都使用了三种不同粘结厚度(20 μm、35 μm 和 50 μm)的基台。在去除挤出的水门汀之前和之后,用高精度分析天平对带有水门汀的试样进行称重,并计算两次测量的差值。然后,使用万能试验机对每个试样进行拉拔试验。记录使锁模脱落所需的载荷。在显著性水平为 0.05 的条件下,使用双向和单向方差分析以及独立样本 t 检验对数据进行分析。结果在传统技术和实践基台固结技术中,20 μm 水泥厚度的固位值最高。两种粘接技术中,粘接剂厚度为50 μm时的过量粘接剂量最高,而粘接剂厚度为20 μm时的平均值最低。但是,必须注意清除挤出的骨水泥。在使用传统基台固位法和实用基台固位法时,20 μm的固位厚度更有利于提高固位牙冠的固位力和减少多余的固位材料。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Effects of cementation technique and cement thickness on the retention and amount of excess cement in implant-supported restorations

Purpose

To assess the amount of excess cement and the retentive strengths of two different cementation techniques (conventional cementation and practice abutment) using copings fabricated with three different cement thicknesses (20 μm, 35 μm, and 50 μm).

Materials and methods

Thirty zirconia copings were fabricated on screw retained abutments and randomly divided into three equal groups (n = 10) according to the cement thickness (20 μm, 35 μm, and 50 μm). Each group was cemented with tow cementation techniques. Cementation was performed with provisional cement (Temp-Bond). In the conventional cementation technique, cement was applied until each coping was approximately half filled, and the copings were subsequently placed on the implant–abutment assembly. Then, the copings were cleaned and cemented using the practice abutment cementation technique to remove excess cement prior to the process. Each technique was performed using copings with three different cement thicknesses (20 μm, 35 μm, and 50 μm). The specimens with the cemented copings were weighed on a high-precision analytical balance before and after removing the extruded cement, and the differences between the two measurements were calculated. Then, each specimen was subjected to a pullout test using a universal testing machine. The load required to dislodge the coping was recorded. The data were analyzed using two-way and one-way analysis of variance and independent sample t tests at a significance level of 0.05.

Results

The highest retention values were obtained for 20 μm cement thickness in the conventional technique and the practice abutment cementation technique. The amount of excess cement was the highest for the 50 μm cement thickness obtained for both cementation techniques, whereas the lowest mean values were recorded for the 20 μm cement thickness.

Conclusion

The conventional cementation technique is recommended over the practice abutment technique to increase the retention of crowns cemented with provisional cement. However, care must be taken to remove the extruded cement. A cement thickness of 20 μm is preferable for enhancing the retention of cemented crowns and for reducing the amount of excess cement when applying both conventional and practical abutment cementation approaches.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Saudi Dental Journal
Saudi Dental Journal DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE-
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
86
审稿时长
22 weeks
期刊介绍: Saudi Dental Journal is an English language, peer-reviewed scholarly publication in the area of dentistry. Saudi Dental Journal publishes original research and reviews on, but not limited to: • dental disease • clinical trials • dental equipment • new and experimental techniques • epidemiology and oral health • restorative dentistry • periodontology • endodontology • prosthodontics • paediatric dentistry • orthodontics and dental education Saudi Dental Journal is the official publication of the Saudi Dental Society and is published by King Saud University in collaboration with Elsevier and is edited by an international group of eminent researchers.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信