意大利语版大通护士长能力量表的可靠性和有效性

IF 2.9 3区 医学 Q1 NURSING
{"title":"意大利语版大通护士长能力量表的可靠性和有效性","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.ijnss.2024.06.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><p>This study aimed to translate and test the psychometric properties of the Chase Nurse Manager Competency Instrument (CNMCI) among Italian nurse managers and to provide further support for the scale’s validity testing.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>An instrument translation and cross-sectional validation study was conducted. The English version was translated into Italian using the translation method, which included pre-translation (establishing equivalence), initial translation, pretesting, review, and administration. From August 2022 to June 2023, 349 nurse managers were recruited through a web survey from 31 public and private healthcare organizations in North, Central, and Southern Italy. Validity assessments included content and structural validity. Reliability was evaluated using Cronbach’s α coefficient and test-retest reliability.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The content validity confirmed all the items of the CNMCI in the Italian version, including the two measurement sections, “knowledge and understand” and “ability to implement and/or use.” The instrument’s item-content validity index (I-CVI) ranged from 0.83 to 1.00, while the scale-level content validity index (S-CVI) for both instrument sections was 0.97. The confirmatory factor analysis showed an acceptable fit. In the “knowledge and understand” section, Cronbach’s α coefficient was 0.978, and in the “ability to implement and/or use” section, Cronbach’s α coefficient was 0.976. The correlation coefficient between each dimension was 0.494–0.908. The test-retest reliability score was 0.82, suggesting good instrument consistency.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Overall, the Italian CNMCI demonstrates good reliability and validity for measuring nurse managers’ core competencies and supports the construct’s multi-dimensionality. Also, our findings support the hierarchical nature of the factors, further supporting the validity of the instrument.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":37848,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Nursing Sciences","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352013224000553/pdfft?md5=6761a1af3978d132f9dba55fcf91d38f&pid=1-s2.0-S2352013224000553-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Reliability and validity of the Italian Version of the Chase Nurse Manager Competencies Scale\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ijnss.2024.06.001\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><p>This study aimed to translate and test the psychometric properties of the Chase Nurse Manager Competency Instrument (CNMCI) among Italian nurse managers and to provide further support for the scale’s validity testing.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>An instrument translation and cross-sectional validation study was conducted. The English version was translated into Italian using the translation method, which included pre-translation (establishing equivalence), initial translation, pretesting, review, and administration. From August 2022 to June 2023, 349 nurse managers were recruited through a web survey from 31 public and private healthcare organizations in North, Central, and Southern Italy. Validity assessments included content and structural validity. Reliability was evaluated using Cronbach’s α coefficient and test-retest reliability.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The content validity confirmed all the items of the CNMCI in the Italian version, including the two measurement sections, “knowledge and understand” and “ability to implement and/or use.” The instrument’s item-content validity index (I-CVI) ranged from 0.83 to 1.00, while the scale-level content validity index (S-CVI) for both instrument sections was 0.97. The confirmatory factor analysis showed an acceptable fit. In the “knowledge and understand” section, Cronbach’s α coefficient was 0.978, and in the “ability to implement and/or use” section, Cronbach’s α coefficient was 0.976. The correlation coefficient between each dimension was 0.494–0.908. The test-retest reliability score was 0.82, suggesting good instrument consistency.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Overall, the Italian CNMCI demonstrates good reliability and validity for measuring nurse managers’ core competencies and supports the construct’s multi-dimensionality. Also, our findings support the hierarchical nature of the factors, further supporting the validity of the instrument.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":37848,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Nursing Sciences\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352013224000553/pdfft?md5=6761a1af3978d132f9dba55fcf91d38f&pid=1-s2.0-S2352013224000553-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Nursing Sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352013224000553\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"NURSING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Nursing Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352013224000553","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究旨在翻译大通护士长胜任能力量表(CNMCI)并测试其在意大利护士长中的心理测量特性,同时为量表的有效性测试提供进一步支持。采用翻译法将英文版翻译成意大利文,包括预翻译(建立等效性)、初译、预试、复核和施测。2022 年 8 月至 2023 年 6 月,通过网络调查从意大利北部、中部和南部的 31 家公立和私立医疗机构招募了 349 名护士管理人员。有效性评估包括内容有效性和结构有效性。结果内容效度证实了意大利语版 CNMCI 的所有项目,包括 "知识和理解 "和 "实施和/或使用能力 "两个测量部分。该工具的项目内容效度指数(I-CVI)在 0.83 至 1.00 之间,而两个测量部分的量表内容效度指数(S-CVI)为 0.97。确认性因子分析显示拟合度可以接受。在 "知识和理解 "部分,Cronbach 的 α 系数为 0.978,在 "实施和/或使用能力 "部分,Cronbach 的 α 系数为 0.976。各维度之间的相关系数为 0.494-0.908。结论总体而言,意大利 CNMCI 在测量护士长核心能力方面表现出了良好的信度和效度,并支持该结构的多维性。此外,我们的研究结果还支持因子的层次性,进一步支持了工具的有效性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Reliability and validity of the Italian Version of the Chase Nurse Manager Competencies Scale

Objectives

This study aimed to translate and test the psychometric properties of the Chase Nurse Manager Competency Instrument (CNMCI) among Italian nurse managers and to provide further support for the scale’s validity testing.

Methods

An instrument translation and cross-sectional validation study was conducted. The English version was translated into Italian using the translation method, which included pre-translation (establishing equivalence), initial translation, pretesting, review, and administration. From August 2022 to June 2023, 349 nurse managers were recruited through a web survey from 31 public and private healthcare organizations in North, Central, and Southern Italy. Validity assessments included content and structural validity. Reliability was evaluated using Cronbach’s α coefficient and test-retest reliability.

Results

The content validity confirmed all the items of the CNMCI in the Italian version, including the two measurement sections, “knowledge and understand” and “ability to implement and/or use.” The instrument’s item-content validity index (I-CVI) ranged from 0.83 to 1.00, while the scale-level content validity index (S-CVI) for both instrument sections was 0.97. The confirmatory factor analysis showed an acceptable fit. In the “knowledge and understand” section, Cronbach’s α coefficient was 0.978, and in the “ability to implement and/or use” section, Cronbach’s α coefficient was 0.976. The correlation coefficient between each dimension was 0.494–0.908. The test-retest reliability score was 0.82, suggesting good instrument consistency.

Conclusions

Overall, the Italian CNMCI demonstrates good reliability and validity for measuring nurse managers’ core competencies and supports the construct’s multi-dimensionality. Also, our findings support the hierarchical nature of the factors, further supporting the validity of the instrument.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
2.60%
发文量
408
审稿时长
25 days
期刊介绍: This journal aims to promote excellence in nursing and health care through the dissemination of the latest, evidence-based, peer-reviewed clinical information and original research, providing an international platform for exchanging knowledge, research findings and nursing practice experience. This journal covers a wide range of nursing topics such as advanced nursing practice, bio-psychosocial issues related to health, cultural perspectives, lifestyle change as a component of health promotion, chronic disease, including end-of-life care, family care giving. IJNSS publishes four issues per year in Jan/Apr/Jul/Oct. IJNSS intended readership includes practicing nurses in all spheres and at all levels who are committed to advancing practice and professional development on the basis of new knowledge and evidence; managers and senior members of the nursing; nurse educators and nursing students etc. IJNSS seeks to enrich insight into clinical need and the implications for nursing intervention and models of service delivery. Contributions are welcomed from other health professions on issues that have a direct impact on nursing practice.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信