Jonathan F. Russell, Benjamin J. Fowler, Hasenin Al-khersan, T. Lazzarini, Nimesh A. Patel, Nasreen A. Syed, Stephen R. Russell
{"title":"半月板微脓肿:视网膜手术与气体填塞术后可能与视网膜外增殖有关的眼底征象","authors":"Jonathan F. Russell, Benjamin J. Fowler, Hasenin Al-khersan, T. Lazzarini, Nimesh A. Patel, Nasreen A. Syed, Stephen R. Russell","doi":"10.1097/iae.0000000000004176","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n \n To describe an ophthalmoscopic sign, termed a meniscus micropyon, and its possible association with proliferative vitreoretinopathy (PVR)/epiretinal membrane (ERM) formation after retinal surgery with gas tamponade.\n \n \n \n Patients with intravitreal gas were examined postoperatively by 1 of 6 vitreoretinal surgeons from 4 institutions. A micropyon was defined as a white-yellow, solid-appearing consolidation along the meniscus (i.e., the fluid-gas interface).\n \n \n \n A micropyon was visualized and photographed in 49 patients who received intravitreal gas. Preoperatively, retinal breaks were present in all 49 eyes and rhegmatogenous retinal detachment (RRD) in 45 (92%). Postoperatively, 39 eyes (80%) developed epiretinal proliferation: 16 eyes (33%) developed recurrent RRD from PVR, 6 eyes (12%) re-detached without frank PVR, 9 eyes (18%) developed postoperative ERM/worsening and 8 eyes (16%) had postoperative ERM but no preoperative OCT to determine if the postoperative ERM was new or worsening. The single-operation anatomic success in eyes with a micropyon was 51%, which was lower than that of a contemporaneous RRD control group (91%) in which no micropyon was detected. In 2 patients, micropyons were biopsied during PPV and examined histopathologically; they consist predominantly of white blood cells (WBCs).\n \n \n \n The meniscus micropyon is an ophthalmoscopic sign that can occur after retinal surgery with gas tamponade. Features that distinguish a micropyon from post-vitrectomy fibrin/fibrinoid syndrome include delayed appearance, hyperautofluorescence, absence of translucent strands or sheets in the anterior chamber or vitreous cavity, and the histopathologic identification of WBCs. A clinically detectable micropyon may be a biomarker of PVR/ERM formation.\n","PeriodicalId":21178,"journal":{"name":"Retina","volume":"56 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Meniscus Micropyon: An Ophthalmoscopic Sign Possibly Associated with Epiretinal Proliferation After Retinal Surgery with Gas Tamponade\",\"authors\":\"Jonathan F. Russell, Benjamin J. Fowler, Hasenin Al-khersan, T. Lazzarini, Nimesh A. Patel, Nasreen A. Syed, Stephen R. Russell\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/iae.0000000000004176\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n \\n To describe an ophthalmoscopic sign, termed a meniscus micropyon, and its possible association with proliferative vitreoretinopathy (PVR)/epiretinal membrane (ERM) formation after retinal surgery with gas tamponade.\\n \\n \\n \\n Patients with intravitreal gas were examined postoperatively by 1 of 6 vitreoretinal surgeons from 4 institutions. A micropyon was defined as a white-yellow, solid-appearing consolidation along the meniscus (i.e., the fluid-gas interface).\\n \\n \\n \\n A micropyon was visualized and photographed in 49 patients who received intravitreal gas. Preoperatively, retinal breaks were present in all 49 eyes and rhegmatogenous retinal detachment (RRD) in 45 (92%). Postoperatively, 39 eyes (80%) developed epiretinal proliferation: 16 eyes (33%) developed recurrent RRD from PVR, 6 eyes (12%) re-detached without frank PVR, 9 eyes (18%) developed postoperative ERM/worsening and 8 eyes (16%) had postoperative ERM but no preoperative OCT to determine if the postoperative ERM was new or worsening. The single-operation anatomic success in eyes with a micropyon was 51%, which was lower than that of a contemporaneous RRD control group (91%) in which no micropyon was detected. In 2 patients, micropyons were biopsied during PPV and examined histopathologically; they consist predominantly of white blood cells (WBCs).\\n \\n \\n \\n The meniscus micropyon is an ophthalmoscopic sign that can occur after retinal surgery with gas tamponade. Features that distinguish a micropyon from post-vitrectomy fibrin/fibrinoid syndrome include delayed appearance, hyperautofluorescence, absence of translucent strands or sheets in the anterior chamber or vitreous cavity, and the histopathologic identification of WBCs. A clinically detectable micropyon may be a biomarker of PVR/ERM formation.\\n\",\"PeriodicalId\":21178,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Retina\",\"volume\":\"56 6\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Retina\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/iae.0000000000004176\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Retina","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/iae.0000000000004176","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Meniscus Micropyon: An Ophthalmoscopic Sign Possibly Associated with Epiretinal Proliferation After Retinal Surgery with Gas Tamponade
To describe an ophthalmoscopic sign, termed a meniscus micropyon, and its possible association with proliferative vitreoretinopathy (PVR)/epiretinal membrane (ERM) formation after retinal surgery with gas tamponade.
Patients with intravitreal gas were examined postoperatively by 1 of 6 vitreoretinal surgeons from 4 institutions. A micropyon was defined as a white-yellow, solid-appearing consolidation along the meniscus (i.e., the fluid-gas interface).
A micropyon was visualized and photographed in 49 patients who received intravitreal gas. Preoperatively, retinal breaks were present in all 49 eyes and rhegmatogenous retinal detachment (RRD) in 45 (92%). Postoperatively, 39 eyes (80%) developed epiretinal proliferation: 16 eyes (33%) developed recurrent RRD from PVR, 6 eyes (12%) re-detached without frank PVR, 9 eyes (18%) developed postoperative ERM/worsening and 8 eyes (16%) had postoperative ERM but no preoperative OCT to determine if the postoperative ERM was new or worsening. The single-operation anatomic success in eyes with a micropyon was 51%, which was lower than that of a contemporaneous RRD control group (91%) in which no micropyon was detected. In 2 patients, micropyons were biopsied during PPV and examined histopathologically; they consist predominantly of white blood cells (WBCs).
The meniscus micropyon is an ophthalmoscopic sign that can occur after retinal surgery with gas tamponade. Features that distinguish a micropyon from post-vitrectomy fibrin/fibrinoid syndrome include delayed appearance, hyperautofluorescence, absence of translucent strands or sheets in the anterior chamber or vitreous cavity, and the histopathologic identification of WBCs. A clinically detectable micropyon may be a biomarker of PVR/ERM formation.