审查作为人类辅助受孕战略的破坏性最小的体外受精(IVF)方法

Clifford A. Kim, J. M. H. Aguilar, Laura Hidalgo, Emily Katz
{"title":"审查作为人类辅助受孕战略的破坏性最小的体外受精(IVF)方法","authors":"Clifford A. Kim, J. M. H. Aguilar, Laura Hidalgo, Emily Katz","doi":"10.52504/001c.117697","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"As a type of assisted reproductive technology (ART), in vitro fertilization (IVF) has been available for more than 4 decades, with the first successful birth using conventional IVF (C-IVF) occurring in 1978. C-IVF has become increasingly available and accessible over the years and is currently a widely used alternative treatment option for prospective parents experiencing infertility. In addition, science and technological advancements have given rise to other IVF techniques that allow families to choose the ART that best fits their personal and unique needs. Among the other IVF techniques, natural cycle IVF, mild stimulation IVF, and in vitro maturation are notable for being less disruptive to the female body and are referred to as minimally disruptive ARTs (MDARTs). However, deciding which MDART to choose is a complex and daunting task that precedes an already emotionally, financially, and physically taxing process. This review explores these modern ART strategies, including protocols, advantages, and limitations, as well as provides the MDART decision matrix that translates these considerations into a practical decision-making guide for patients seeking IVF.","PeriodicalId":340325,"journal":{"name":"Georgetown Medical Review","volume":"311 9","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Review of minimally disruptive in vitro fertilization (IVF) approaches as a strategy for assisted human conception\",\"authors\":\"Clifford A. Kim, J. M. H. Aguilar, Laura Hidalgo, Emily Katz\",\"doi\":\"10.52504/001c.117697\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"As a type of assisted reproductive technology (ART), in vitro fertilization (IVF) has been available for more than 4 decades, with the first successful birth using conventional IVF (C-IVF) occurring in 1978. C-IVF has become increasingly available and accessible over the years and is currently a widely used alternative treatment option for prospective parents experiencing infertility. In addition, science and technological advancements have given rise to other IVF techniques that allow families to choose the ART that best fits their personal and unique needs. Among the other IVF techniques, natural cycle IVF, mild stimulation IVF, and in vitro maturation are notable for being less disruptive to the female body and are referred to as minimally disruptive ARTs (MDARTs). However, deciding which MDART to choose is a complex and daunting task that precedes an already emotionally, financially, and physically taxing process. This review explores these modern ART strategies, including protocols, advantages, and limitations, as well as provides the MDART decision matrix that translates these considerations into a practical decision-making guide for patients seeking IVF.\",\"PeriodicalId\":340325,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Georgetown Medical Review\",\"volume\":\"311 9\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Georgetown Medical Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.52504/001c.117697\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Georgetown Medical Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.52504/001c.117697","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

作为辅助生殖技术(ART)的一种,体外受精(IVF)已经有 40 多年的历史,1978 年首次使用传统体外受精(C-IVF)成功生育。多年来,C-IVF 的可用性和可及性不断提高,目前已成为不孕症准父母广泛采用的替代治疗方案。此外,科学和技术的进步还催生了其他试管婴儿技术,使家庭能够选择最适合其个人独特需求的抗逆转录病毒疗法。在其他试管婴儿技术中,自然周期试管婴儿、温和刺激试管婴儿和体外成熟等技术对女性身体的干扰较小,被称为最小干扰试管婴儿技术(MDARTs)。然而,决定选择哪种 MDART 是一项复杂而艰巨的任务,在此之前,患者已经在情感、经济和身体上承受了巨大的压力。本综述探讨了这些现代抗逆转录病毒疗法的策略,包括方案、优势和局限性,并提供了 MDART 决策矩阵,将这些考虑因素转化为试管婴儿患者的实用决策指南。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Review of minimally disruptive in vitro fertilization (IVF) approaches as a strategy for assisted human conception
As a type of assisted reproductive technology (ART), in vitro fertilization (IVF) has been available for more than 4 decades, with the first successful birth using conventional IVF (C-IVF) occurring in 1978. C-IVF has become increasingly available and accessible over the years and is currently a widely used alternative treatment option for prospective parents experiencing infertility. In addition, science and technological advancements have given rise to other IVF techniques that allow families to choose the ART that best fits their personal and unique needs. Among the other IVF techniques, natural cycle IVF, mild stimulation IVF, and in vitro maturation are notable for being less disruptive to the female body and are referred to as minimally disruptive ARTs (MDARTs). However, deciding which MDART to choose is a complex and daunting task that precedes an already emotionally, financially, and physically taxing process. This review explores these modern ART strategies, including protocols, advantages, and limitations, as well as provides the MDART decision matrix that translates these considerations into a practical decision-making guide for patients seeking IVF.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信