{"title":"利用需求容量比格式简化地震荷载作用下结构的可靠性评估","authors":"Ricardo B. Flores, Dante Tolentino","doi":"10.1007/s10518-024-01923-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>In this paper, closed-form expressions to calculate both the mean annual failure rate and the confidence factor are proposed. Reliability indicators are estimated assuming a normalization between capacity and demand called <span>\\(I_{DC}\\)</span><sub><i>.</i></sub> Simplified closed-form expressions are obtained in accordance with the probability seismic demand analysis used in SAC/FEMA. Uncertainties associated to mechanical, geometrical, and epistemic properties are taken into account, as well as uncertainties related to the occurrence of earthquakes. A comparison of both the mean annual failure rate and the confidence factor with <span>\\(I_{DC}\\)</span> and the expressions proposed by Cornell and collaborators is performed. The numerical approach for the mean annual failure rate is obtained to verify the approximation of the closed-form solutions. Reliability indicators are obtained using six continuous reinforced concrete bridges designed to comply with three drift thresholds (0.002, 0.003 and 0.004). The bridge systems are situated in transition soil of Mexico City. Maximum differences of 4.1% and 10.6% are obtained between the proposed expression and the numerical solution for the mean annual rate of failure, estimated for two limit states: serviceability and collapse. The confidence factor presents differences of 5.2% between the present study and the original formulation.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":9364,"journal":{"name":"Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering","volume":"22 9","pages":"4635 - 4655"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Simplified estimation of reliability in structures subjected to seismic loads using the demand-capacity ratio format\",\"authors\":\"Ricardo B. Flores, Dante Tolentino\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10518-024-01923-y\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>In this paper, closed-form expressions to calculate both the mean annual failure rate and the confidence factor are proposed. Reliability indicators are estimated assuming a normalization between capacity and demand called <span>\\\\(I_{DC}\\\\)</span><sub><i>.</i></sub> Simplified closed-form expressions are obtained in accordance with the probability seismic demand analysis used in SAC/FEMA. Uncertainties associated to mechanical, geometrical, and epistemic properties are taken into account, as well as uncertainties related to the occurrence of earthquakes. A comparison of both the mean annual failure rate and the confidence factor with <span>\\\\(I_{DC}\\\\)</span> and the expressions proposed by Cornell and collaborators is performed. The numerical approach for the mean annual failure rate is obtained to verify the approximation of the closed-form solutions. Reliability indicators are obtained using six continuous reinforced concrete bridges designed to comply with three drift thresholds (0.002, 0.003 and 0.004). The bridge systems are situated in transition soil of Mexico City. Maximum differences of 4.1% and 10.6% are obtained between the proposed expression and the numerical solution for the mean annual rate of failure, estimated for two limit states: serviceability and collapse. The confidence factor presents differences of 5.2% between the present study and the original formulation.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9364,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering\",\"volume\":\"22 9\",\"pages\":\"4635 - 4655\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10518-024-01923-y\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, GEOLOGICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10518-024-01923-y","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, GEOLOGICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
Simplified estimation of reliability in structures subjected to seismic loads using the demand-capacity ratio format
In this paper, closed-form expressions to calculate both the mean annual failure rate and the confidence factor are proposed. Reliability indicators are estimated assuming a normalization between capacity and demand called \(I_{DC}\). Simplified closed-form expressions are obtained in accordance with the probability seismic demand analysis used in SAC/FEMA. Uncertainties associated to mechanical, geometrical, and epistemic properties are taken into account, as well as uncertainties related to the occurrence of earthquakes. A comparison of both the mean annual failure rate and the confidence factor with \(I_{DC}\) and the expressions proposed by Cornell and collaborators is performed. The numerical approach for the mean annual failure rate is obtained to verify the approximation of the closed-form solutions. Reliability indicators are obtained using six continuous reinforced concrete bridges designed to comply with three drift thresholds (0.002, 0.003 and 0.004). The bridge systems are situated in transition soil of Mexico City. Maximum differences of 4.1% and 10.6% are obtained between the proposed expression and the numerical solution for the mean annual rate of failure, estimated for two limit states: serviceability and collapse. The confidence factor presents differences of 5.2% between the present study and the original formulation.
期刊介绍:
Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering presents original, peer-reviewed papers on research related to the broad spectrum of earthquake engineering. The journal offers a forum for presentation and discussion of such matters as European damaging earthquakes, new developments in earthquake regulations, and national policies applied after major seismic events, including strengthening of existing buildings.
Coverage includes seismic hazard studies and methods for mitigation of risk; earthquake source mechanism and strong motion characterization and their use for engineering applications; geological and geotechnical site conditions under earthquake excitations; cyclic behavior of soils; analysis and design of earth structures and foundations under seismic conditions; zonation and microzonation methodologies; earthquake scenarios and vulnerability assessments; earthquake codes and improvements, and much more.
This is the Official Publication of the European Association for Earthquake Engineering.