自闭症专科教育中适应行为评估的实践反思

IF 0.9 Q3 EDUCATION, SPECIAL
Alicia H. Eysenck, Samantha Sewell, SallyAnn Wakeford, Sophie Richards, Joanna Taylor, Rachel L. Moseley
{"title":"自闭症专科教育中适应行为评估的实践反思","authors":"Alicia H. Eysenck,&nbsp;Samantha Sewell,&nbsp;SallyAnn Wakeford,&nbsp;Sophie Richards,&nbsp;Joanna Taylor,&nbsp;Rachel L. Moseley","doi":"10.1111/1467-8578.12521","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Adaptive behaviour is crucial for well-being and independence. The Adaptive Behaviour Assessment System (ABAS-3) is often used to plan individualised support in specialist educational settings, drawing on both teacher and parent informants. In practice, however, little is known about the extent of variation between informants. We examined informant discrepancies in a naturally occurring dataset of 28 ABAS-3 assessments (21 male, seven female), performed by teachers and by parents post-admission at an autism specialist school. We found that in real-life practice, teachers rated the adaptive functioning capabilities of their students significantly more highly than parents across all ABAS-3 domains, a discrepancy significantly greater than validation studies with this instrument, and interestingly, non-uniform across domains. The magnitude of this discrepancy was largest in the Conceptual domain, where differences between informants were greater in older children. The skill area most affected was ‘self-direction’, which includes aspects of executive function. Existing guidance for adaptive functioning assessment in specialist education is extremely limited; while considering potential sources of informant discrepancy, our findings corroborate the need for further guidance on the use and scope of tools like the ABAS-3 in educational settings. While such discrepancies may confound population-level data, individually, these skills may be indicative of greater need to support generalisation across contexts, and may indicate the particular skill areas that are most amenable to intervention.</p>","PeriodicalId":46054,"journal":{"name":"British Journal of Special Education","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Practice-focused reflections on adaptive behaviour assessment in autism specialist education\",\"authors\":\"Alicia H. Eysenck,&nbsp;Samantha Sewell,&nbsp;SallyAnn Wakeford,&nbsp;Sophie Richards,&nbsp;Joanna Taylor,&nbsp;Rachel L. Moseley\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/1467-8578.12521\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Adaptive behaviour is crucial for well-being and independence. The Adaptive Behaviour Assessment System (ABAS-3) is often used to plan individualised support in specialist educational settings, drawing on both teacher and parent informants. In practice, however, little is known about the extent of variation between informants. We examined informant discrepancies in a naturally occurring dataset of 28 ABAS-3 assessments (21 male, seven female), performed by teachers and by parents post-admission at an autism specialist school. We found that in real-life practice, teachers rated the adaptive functioning capabilities of their students significantly more highly than parents across all ABAS-3 domains, a discrepancy significantly greater than validation studies with this instrument, and interestingly, non-uniform across domains. The magnitude of this discrepancy was largest in the Conceptual domain, where differences between informants were greater in older children. The skill area most affected was ‘self-direction’, which includes aspects of executive function. Existing guidance for adaptive functioning assessment in specialist education is extremely limited; while considering potential sources of informant discrepancy, our findings corroborate the need for further guidance on the use and scope of tools like the ABAS-3 in educational settings. While such discrepancies may confound population-level data, individually, these skills may be indicative of greater need to support generalisation across contexts, and may indicate the particular skill areas that are most amenable to intervention.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":46054,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"British Journal of Special Education\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"British Journal of Special Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1467-8578.12521\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION, SPECIAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British Journal of Special Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1467-8578.12521","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SPECIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

适应行为对幸福和独立至关重要。适应行为评估系统(ABAS-3)通常被用于在专业教育环境中规划个性化支持,同时借鉴教师和家长提供的信息。然而,在实践中,人们对信息提供者之间的差异程度知之甚少。我们研究了自闭症专科学校入学后由教师和家长进行的 28 项 ABAS-3 评估(21 名男性,7 名女性)的自然数据集中的信息提供者差异。我们发现,在现实生活中,在 ABAS-3 的所有领域中,教师对学生适应功能能力的评价都明显高于家长,这种差异明显大于对该工具的验证研究,而且有趣的是,这种差异在不同领域中并不一致。这种差异的幅度在概念领域最大,在这一领域中,年长儿童与家长之间的差异更大。受影响最大的技能领域是 "自我指导",其中包括执行功能的各个方面。专科教育中现有的适应功能评估指南极为有限;在考虑到告密者差异的潜在来源的同时,我们的研究结果证实,有必要就 ABAS-3 等工具在教育环境中的使用和范围提供进一步的指导。虽然这种差异可能会混淆群体层面的数据,但就个体而言,这些技能可能表明更需要支持跨环境的通用性,并可能表明最适于干预的特定技能领域。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Practice-focused reflections on adaptive behaviour assessment in autism specialist education

Adaptive behaviour is crucial for well-being and independence. The Adaptive Behaviour Assessment System (ABAS-3) is often used to plan individualised support in specialist educational settings, drawing on both teacher and parent informants. In practice, however, little is known about the extent of variation between informants. We examined informant discrepancies in a naturally occurring dataset of 28 ABAS-3 assessments (21 male, seven female), performed by teachers and by parents post-admission at an autism specialist school. We found that in real-life practice, teachers rated the adaptive functioning capabilities of their students significantly more highly than parents across all ABAS-3 domains, a discrepancy significantly greater than validation studies with this instrument, and interestingly, non-uniform across domains. The magnitude of this discrepancy was largest in the Conceptual domain, where differences between informants were greater in older children. The skill area most affected was ‘self-direction’, which includes aspects of executive function. Existing guidance for adaptive functioning assessment in specialist education is extremely limited; while considering potential sources of informant discrepancy, our findings corroborate the need for further guidance on the use and scope of tools like the ABAS-3 in educational settings. While such discrepancies may confound population-level data, individually, these skills may be indicative of greater need to support generalisation across contexts, and may indicate the particular skill areas that are most amenable to intervention.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
15.40%
发文量
52
期刊介绍: This well-established and respected journal covers the whole range of learning difficulties relating to children in mainstream and special schools. It is widely read by nasen members as well as other practitioners, administrators advisers, teacher educators and researchers in the UK and overseas. The British Journal of Special Education is concerned with a wide range of special educational needs, and covers all levels of education pre-school, school, and post-school.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信