在气候紧急状况背景下为学术界与活动家之间的有效合作制定一项迷你计划

Duncan P. McLaren, Christine Anderson, John Barry, Vanesa Castán Broto, Suzanne de Cheveigné, Jason Chilvers, Alison Crowther, J. Hupé, Liz Kalaugher, Olivier Labussière, Tina L. Rothery, Alain Nadai, Nathalie Ortar, Jordan Raine, Graham Smith, Grégoire Wallenborn, Gordon Walker
{"title":"在气候紧急状况背景下为学术界与活动家之间的有效合作制定一项迷你计划","authors":"Duncan P. McLaren, Christine Anderson, John Barry, Vanesa Castán Broto, Suzanne de Cheveigné, Jason Chilvers, Alison Crowther, J. Hupé, Liz Kalaugher, Olivier Labussière, Tina L. Rothery, Alain Nadai, Nathalie Ortar, Jordan Raine, Graham Smith, Grégoire Wallenborn, Gordon Walker","doi":"10.3389/feduc.2024.1384614","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Justice-oriented climate activism is proliferating. Many scholars aspire to deliver research that supports activism. However, measures of impact for research evaluation and funding purposes place little weight on the use of research by activists. Here we consider how academics and academia might effectively support and enable climate activism. We report outcomes from a series of online deliberative workshops involving both activists and academics from several European countries. The workshops were facilitated to create space for discussion, sharing of experiences and the development of proposals for the future. The outcomes take the form of a set of principles (a “minifesta”) for academic-activist engagement generated by the group. In discussing the process and outputs, we argue that a focus on inclusion can support politically transformative change of the scale and urgency required. We suggest that this also demands a shift in attitudes toward the role of activism and activists in collaborative processes. We further discuss the inevitable incompleteness of this process, arguing that incompleteness is, itself, a feature of inclusive engagement. We conclude that scholars working on climate issues in any discipline could benefit from increasing mutually supportive collaboration with activists; and that such collaboration and inclusion could help liberate democracy from authoritarian tendencies and market influences. Collaborative engagements generate legitimate, rich, and impactful outcomes even with the limitations posed by COVID19. We, therefore, commend both the model of engagement and the principles it generated for our colleagues and peers.","PeriodicalId":508739,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Education","volume":"130 18","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Developing a minifesta for effective academic-activist collaboration in the context of the climate emergency\",\"authors\":\"Duncan P. McLaren, Christine Anderson, John Barry, Vanesa Castán Broto, Suzanne de Cheveigné, Jason Chilvers, Alison Crowther, J. Hupé, Liz Kalaugher, Olivier Labussière, Tina L. Rothery, Alain Nadai, Nathalie Ortar, Jordan Raine, Graham Smith, Grégoire Wallenborn, Gordon Walker\",\"doi\":\"10.3389/feduc.2024.1384614\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Justice-oriented climate activism is proliferating. Many scholars aspire to deliver research that supports activism. However, measures of impact for research evaluation and funding purposes place little weight on the use of research by activists. Here we consider how academics and academia might effectively support and enable climate activism. We report outcomes from a series of online deliberative workshops involving both activists and academics from several European countries. The workshops were facilitated to create space for discussion, sharing of experiences and the development of proposals for the future. The outcomes take the form of a set of principles (a “minifesta”) for academic-activist engagement generated by the group. In discussing the process and outputs, we argue that a focus on inclusion can support politically transformative change of the scale and urgency required. We suggest that this also demands a shift in attitudes toward the role of activism and activists in collaborative processes. We further discuss the inevitable incompleteness of this process, arguing that incompleteness is, itself, a feature of inclusive engagement. We conclude that scholars working on climate issues in any discipline could benefit from increasing mutually supportive collaboration with activists; and that such collaboration and inclusion could help liberate democracy from authoritarian tendencies and market influences. Collaborative engagements generate legitimate, rich, and impactful outcomes even with the limitations posed by COVID19. We, therefore, commend both the model of engagement and the principles it generated for our colleagues and peers.\",\"PeriodicalId\":508739,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Frontiers in Education\",\"volume\":\"130 18\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Frontiers in Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2024.1384614\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2024.1384614","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

以正义为导向的气候行动主义如雨后春笋般涌现。许多学者渴望开展支持行动主义的研究。然而,以研究评估和资助为目的的影响衡量标准很少重视活动家对研究的利用。在此,我们将考虑学者和学术界如何才能有效地支持和推动气候行动主义。我们报告了一系列在线讨论研讨会的成果,来自欧洲多个国家的活动家和学者参与了这些研讨会。这些研讨会为讨论、分享经验和制定未来建议创造了空间。这些成果以小组提出的一套学术-活动家参与原则("minifesta")的形式出现。在讨论过程和成果时,我们认为,注重包容性能够支持所需的规模和紧迫性的政治变革。我们认为,这也要求在合作过程中转变对行动主义和行动主义者角色的态度。我们进一步讨论了这一过程中不可避免的不完整性,认为不完整性本身就是包容性参与的一个特征。我们的结论是,任何学科中从事气候问题研究的学者都可以从加强与活动家的相互支持的合作中获益;这种合作和包容有助于将民主从专制倾向和市场影响中解放出来。即使受到 COVID19 的限制,合作参与也能产生合法、丰富和有影响力的成果。因此,我们对这一参与模式及其为我们的同事和同行提出的原则表示赞赏。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Developing a minifesta for effective academic-activist collaboration in the context of the climate emergency
Justice-oriented climate activism is proliferating. Many scholars aspire to deliver research that supports activism. However, measures of impact for research evaluation and funding purposes place little weight on the use of research by activists. Here we consider how academics and academia might effectively support and enable climate activism. We report outcomes from a series of online deliberative workshops involving both activists and academics from several European countries. The workshops were facilitated to create space for discussion, sharing of experiences and the development of proposals for the future. The outcomes take the form of a set of principles (a “minifesta”) for academic-activist engagement generated by the group. In discussing the process and outputs, we argue that a focus on inclusion can support politically transformative change of the scale and urgency required. We suggest that this also demands a shift in attitudes toward the role of activism and activists in collaborative processes. We further discuss the inevitable incompleteness of this process, arguing that incompleteness is, itself, a feature of inclusive engagement. We conclude that scholars working on climate issues in any discipline could benefit from increasing mutually supportive collaboration with activists; and that such collaboration and inclusion could help liberate democracy from authoritarian tendencies and market influences. Collaborative engagements generate legitimate, rich, and impactful outcomes even with the limitations posed by COVID19. We, therefore, commend both the model of engagement and the principles it generated for our colleagues and peers.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信