通过战略非正规化瓦解欧盟宪法:软性重新接纳治理作为协调一致的解体

IF 1.4 2区 社会学 Q1 LAW
Violeta Moreno-Lax
{"title":"通过战略非正规化瓦解欧盟宪法:软性重新接纳治理作为协调一致的解体","authors":"Violeta Moreno-Lax","doi":"10.1111/eulj.12506","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>This contribution takes issue with what I have called the ‘constitutional dismantling’ of external migration policy through the tactical informalisation of readmission cooperation. It maps out the strategic use of soft law mediating the tacit approval or active involvement of the main EU actors. The strategy is supposed to enhance policy outcomes but is at the expense of foundational principles. The principles of conferral, institutional balance, and sincere/loyal cooperation impose key constraints on EU/Member State action that the choice for soft law ignores. My main contention is that this is not an unintended consequence, but a deliberate or, at least, tolerated result, amounting to a form of ‘concerted dis-integration’ pursued by the very actors supposed to guard the EU integration project in line with Treaty provisions. The approach denotes the instrumentalisation of legal mechanisms for the advancement of policy objectives, embracing a regulation-without-legitimation paradigm that unravels the EU’s constitutional framework.</p>","PeriodicalId":47166,"journal":{"name":"European Law Journal","volume":"30 1-2","pages":"29-59"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/eulj.12506","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"EU constitutional dismantling through strategic informalisation: Soft readmission governance as concerted dis-integration\",\"authors\":\"Violeta Moreno-Lax\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/eulj.12506\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>This contribution takes issue with what I have called the ‘constitutional dismantling’ of external migration policy through the tactical informalisation of readmission cooperation. It maps out the strategic use of soft law mediating the tacit approval or active involvement of the main EU actors. The strategy is supposed to enhance policy outcomes but is at the expense of foundational principles. The principles of conferral, institutional balance, and sincere/loyal cooperation impose key constraints on EU/Member State action that the choice for soft law ignores. My main contention is that this is not an unintended consequence, but a deliberate or, at least, tolerated result, amounting to a form of ‘concerted dis-integration’ pursued by the very actors supposed to guard the EU integration project in line with Treaty provisions. The approach denotes the instrumentalisation of legal mechanisms for the advancement of policy objectives, embracing a regulation-without-legitimation paradigm that unravels the EU’s constitutional framework.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47166,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Law Journal\",\"volume\":\"30 1-2\",\"pages\":\"29-59\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/eulj.12506\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Law Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/eulj.12506\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"LAW\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Law Journal","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/eulj.12506","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

这篇论文对我所称的通过重新接纳合作的战术性非正式化来 "拆解 "对外移民政策的做法提出了质疑。它描绘了软性法律的战略运用,在欧盟主要行动者的默许或积极参与下进行调解。该战略旨在加强政策成果,但却牺牲了基本原则。授权原则、制度平衡原则和真诚/忠诚合作原则对欧盟/成员国的行动施加了关键限制,而选择软法律却忽略了这一点。我的主要论点是,这并不是一个意外的结果,而是一个蓄意或至少是被容忍的结果,相当于一种 "一致的不一体化",而这种 "一致的不一体化 "正是由那些本应按照条约规定保护欧盟一体化项目的行为者所推行的。这种方法将法律机制工具化,以推进政策目标,采用了一种 "无法律依据的监管 "范式,破坏了欧盟的宪法框架。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
EU constitutional dismantling through strategic informalisation: Soft readmission governance as concerted dis-integration

This contribution takes issue with what I have called the ‘constitutional dismantling’ of external migration policy through the tactical informalisation of readmission cooperation. It maps out the strategic use of soft law mediating the tacit approval or active involvement of the main EU actors. The strategy is supposed to enhance policy outcomes but is at the expense of foundational principles. The principles of conferral, institutional balance, and sincere/loyal cooperation impose key constraints on EU/Member State action that the choice for soft law ignores. My main contention is that this is not an unintended consequence, but a deliberate or, at least, tolerated result, amounting to a form of ‘concerted dis-integration’ pursued by the very actors supposed to guard the EU integration project in line with Treaty provisions. The approach denotes the instrumentalisation of legal mechanisms for the advancement of policy objectives, embracing a regulation-without-legitimation paradigm that unravels the EU’s constitutional framework.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
21.10%
发文量
13
期刊介绍: The European Law Journal represents an authoritative new approach to the study of European Law, developed specifically to express and develop the study and understanding of European law in its social, cultural, political and economic context. It has a highly reputed board of editors. The journal fills a major gap in the current literature on all issues of European law, and is essential reading for anyone studying or practising EU law and its diverse impact on the environment, national legal systems, local government, economic organizations, and European citizens. As well as focusing on the European Union, the journal also examines the national legal systems of countries in Western, Central and Eastern Europe and relations between Europe and other parts of the world, particularly the United States, Japan, China, India, Mercosur and developing countries. The journal is published in English but is dedicated to publishing native language articles and has a dedicated translation fund available for this purpose. It is a refereed journal.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信