客观反馈:教学研究课程学生的观点

IF 1.6 Q2 SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY
Ligita Stramkale
{"title":"客观反馈:教学研究课程学生的观点","authors":"Ligita Stramkale","doi":"10.15503/jecs2024.1.85.100","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Aim. The study aims to determine the views of the pedagogical study programme students about providing objective feedback in the educational process to identify its main characteristics.\nMethods. The study uses a mixed research design through the collection and analysis of quantitative and qualitative data within the framework of one study. The study included 82 (n=82) participants studying in part-time bachelor’s and master’s study programmes. The study addresses three research questions: RQ1: At what level do students assess the statements describing the provision of objective feedback? RQ2: What is the difference in students’ views about objective feedback based on the study programme level and their employment? RQ3: What are the main characteristics of objective feedback? SPSS version 22 was used for quantitative data analysis, but the qualitative data were processed using content analysis. \nResults. Most respondents agree that objective feedback is significant and motivates students to learn. The study identifies nine main characteristics of objective feedback that were divided into three groups: teacher personality traits, teaching and learning outcomes, and teacher professionalism. The study found that those students who, in parallel with their studies, work part-time in one of the general education institutions rate the competence of teachers in providing objective feedback statistically significantly higher than those students who work in a profession outside the education system or do not work at all. \nConclusion. The findings provide a better understanding of the main characteristics of objective feedback, thereby reducing the subjectivity in assessment.","PeriodicalId":30646,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Education Culture and Society","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Objective Feedback: The Views of Pedagogical Study Programme Students\",\"authors\":\"Ligita Stramkale\",\"doi\":\"10.15503/jecs2024.1.85.100\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Aim. The study aims to determine the views of the pedagogical study programme students about providing objective feedback in the educational process to identify its main characteristics.\\nMethods. The study uses a mixed research design through the collection and analysis of quantitative and qualitative data within the framework of one study. The study included 82 (n=82) participants studying in part-time bachelor’s and master’s study programmes. The study addresses three research questions: RQ1: At what level do students assess the statements describing the provision of objective feedback? RQ2: What is the difference in students’ views about objective feedback based on the study programme level and their employment? RQ3: What are the main characteristics of objective feedback? SPSS version 22 was used for quantitative data analysis, but the qualitative data were processed using content analysis. \\nResults. Most respondents agree that objective feedback is significant and motivates students to learn. The study identifies nine main characteristics of objective feedback that were divided into three groups: teacher personality traits, teaching and learning outcomes, and teacher professionalism. The study found that those students who, in parallel with their studies, work part-time in one of the general education institutions rate the competence of teachers in providing objective feedback statistically significantly higher than those students who work in a profession outside the education system or do not work at all. \\nConclusion. The findings provide a better understanding of the main characteristics of objective feedback, thereby reducing the subjectivity in assessment.\",\"PeriodicalId\":30646,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Education Culture and Society\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Education Culture and Society\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.15503/jecs2024.1.85.100\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Education Culture and Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15503/jecs2024.1.85.100","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

研究目的本研究旨在确定教学研究课程学生对在教育过程中提供客观反馈的看法,以确定其主要特点。本研究采用混合研究设计,在一项研究的框架内收集和分析定量和定性数据。研究对象包括 82 名(n=82)参加非全日制学士和硕士学习课程的学生。本研究探讨了三个研究问题:问题 1:学生对提供客观反馈的评价处于什么水平?问题 2:学生对客观反馈的看法在学习课程水平和就业方面有何不同?问题 3:客观反馈的主要特点是什么?使用 SPSS 22 版进行定量数据分析,但使用内容分析法处理定性数据。结果大多数受访者都认为客观反馈意义重大,能激发学生的学习动机。研究确定了客观反馈的九个主要特征,并将其分为三组:教师个性特征、教学成果和教师职业精神。研究发现,那些在学习的同时还在普通教育机构兼职的学生对教师提供客观反馈的能力的评价,在统计上明显高于那些在教育系统外从事专业工作或根本没有工作的学生。结论研究结果让我们更好地了解了客观反馈的主要特点,从而减少了评估中的主观性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Objective Feedback: The Views of Pedagogical Study Programme Students
Aim. The study aims to determine the views of the pedagogical study programme students about providing objective feedback in the educational process to identify its main characteristics. Methods. The study uses a mixed research design through the collection and analysis of quantitative and qualitative data within the framework of one study. The study included 82 (n=82) participants studying in part-time bachelor’s and master’s study programmes. The study addresses three research questions: RQ1: At what level do students assess the statements describing the provision of objective feedback? RQ2: What is the difference in students’ views about objective feedback based on the study programme level and their employment? RQ3: What are the main characteristics of objective feedback? SPSS version 22 was used for quantitative data analysis, but the qualitative data were processed using content analysis.  Results. Most respondents agree that objective feedback is significant and motivates students to learn. The study identifies nine main characteristics of objective feedback that were divided into three groups: teacher personality traits, teaching and learning outcomes, and teacher professionalism. The study found that those students who, in parallel with their studies, work part-time in one of the general education institutions rate the competence of teachers in providing objective feedback statistically significantly higher than those students who work in a profession outside the education system or do not work at all.  Conclusion. The findings provide a better understanding of the main characteristics of objective feedback, thereby reducing the subjectivity in assessment.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Education Culture and Society
Journal of Education Culture and Society SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
27.30%
发文量
75
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信