通过不同的营养评估工具评估胃癌患者确诊时的营养状况及其与三年死亡率的关系

IF 1.9 Q3 ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM
Zeinab Nikniaz, Mohammad Hossein Somi, Shahnaz Naghashi
{"title":"通过不同的营养评估工具评估胃癌患者确诊时的营养状况及其与三年死亡率的关系","authors":"Zeinab Nikniaz,&nbsp;Mohammad Hossein Somi,&nbsp;Shahnaz Naghashi","doi":"10.1016/j.hnm.2024.200274","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Aim</h3><p>This study aimed to evaluate the on-diagnosis nutritional status of patients with gastric cancer via different nutritional assessment tools and their association with three-year mortality.</p></div><div><h3>Materials and method</h3><p>In the present prospective study, 303 participants with GC, aged≥18 years old were included. The nutritional status assessment was performed after diagnosis and before initiation of any treatment using PG-SGA, NRS-2002, and MUST tests. All patients were followed up every six months for three years. The overall survival (OS) was calculated from the diagnosis date to the date of death or last visit.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The prevalence of malnutrition was 74.6 %, 66.7 %, and 64.2 % according to NRS-2002, MUST, and PG-SGA tools respectively. There was a slight agreement between PG-SGA and NRS2002 and MUST; and NRS2002 and MUST. Considering the PG-SGA as a reference tool, the sensitivity for NRS2002 was high (83.5 %), but MUST showed low sensitivity (71.6 %). The specificity for both tests was low. There was a significant association between three-year mortality and patients at risk of malnutrition based on the PG-SGA tool (P = 0.04).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>The present study showed the high prevalence of malnutrition in GC patients on admission. At diagnosis, PG-SGA should be applied to screen nutritional status, and based on this tool results, proper nutritional interventions should be implemented to improve nutritional status in patients with GC.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":36125,"journal":{"name":"Human Nutrition and Metabolism","volume":"37 ","pages":"Article 200274"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666149724000367/pdfft?md5=d19852c959e15c61c335d438d444ca68&pid=1-s2.0-S2666149724000367-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation of the on-diagnosis nutritional status of patients with gastric cancer via different nutritional assessment tools and their association with three-year mortality\",\"authors\":\"Zeinab Nikniaz,&nbsp;Mohammad Hossein Somi,&nbsp;Shahnaz Naghashi\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.hnm.2024.200274\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Aim</h3><p>This study aimed to evaluate the on-diagnosis nutritional status of patients with gastric cancer via different nutritional assessment tools and their association with three-year mortality.</p></div><div><h3>Materials and method</h3><p>In the present prospective study, 303 participants with GC, aged≥18 years old were included. The nutritional status assessment was performed after diagnosis and before initiation of any treatment using PG-SGA, NRS-2002, and MUST tests. All patients were followed up every six months for three years. The overall survival (OS) was calculated from the diagnosis date to the date of death or last visit.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The prevalence of malnutrition was 74.6 %, 66.7 %, and 64.2 % according to NRS-2002, MUST, and PG-SGA tools respectively. There was a slight agreement between PG-SGA and NRS2002 and MUST; and NRS2002 and MUST. Considering the PG-SGA as a reference tool, the sensitivity for NRS2002 was high (83.5 %), but MUST showed low sensitivity (71.6 %). The specificity for both tests was low. There was a significant association between three-year mortality and patients at risk of malnutrition based on the PG-SGA tool (P = 0.04).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>The present study showed the high prevalence of malnutrition in GC patients on admission. At diagnosis, PG-SGA should be applied to screen nutritional status, and based on this tool results, proper nutritional interventions should be implemented to improve nutritional status in patients with GC.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":36125,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Human Nutrition and Metabolism\",\"volume\":\"37 \",\"pages\":\"Article 200274\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666149724000367/pdfft?md5=d19852c959e15c61c335d438d444ca68&pid=1-s2.0-S2666149724000367-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Human Nutrition and Metabolism\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666149724000367\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Human Nutrition and Metabolism","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666149724000367","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究旨在通过不同的营养评估工具评估胃癌患者确诊时的营养状况及其与三年死亡率的关系。在确诊后和开始任何治疗前,使用 PG-SGA、NRS-2002 和 MUST 测试进行营养状况评估。所有患者每六个月接受一次随访,为期三年。结果根据 NRS-2002、MUST 和 PG-SGA 工具,营养不良发生率分别为 74.6%、66.7% 和 64.2%。PG-SGA 与 NRS2002 和 MUST,以及 NRS2002 与 MUST 之间略有一致。将 PG-SGA 作为参考工具,NRS2002 的灵敏度较高(83.5%),但 MUST 的灵敏度较低(71.6%)。两种测试的特异性都很低。根据 PG-SGA 工具,三年死亡率与有营养不良风险的患者之间存在明显关联(P = 0.04)。诊断时应使用 PG-SGA 筛查营养状况,并根据该工具的结果实施适当的营养干预,以改善 GC 患者的营养状况。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Evaluation of the on-diagnosis nutritional status of patients with gastric cancer via different nutritional assessment tools and their association with three-year mortality

Aim

This study aimed to evaluate the on-diagnosis nutritional status of patients with gastric cancer via different nutritional assessment tools and their association with three-year mortality.

Materials and method

In the present prospective study, 303 participants with GC, aged≥18 years old were included. The nutritional status assessment was performed after diagnosis and before initiation of any treatment using PG-SGA, NRS-2002, and MUST tests. All patients were followed up every six months for three years. The overall survival (OS) was calculated from the diagnosis date to the date of death or last visit.

Results

The prevalence of malnutrition was 74.6 %, 66.7 %, and 64.2 % according to NRS-2002, MUST, and PG-SGA tools respectively. There was a slight agreement between PG-SGA and NRS2002 and MUST; and NRS2002 and MUST. Considering the PG-SGA as a reference tool, the sensitivity for NRS2002 was high (83.5 %), but MUST showed low sensitivity (71.6 %). The specificity for both tests was low. There was a significant association between three-year mortality and patients at risk of malnutrition based on the PG-SGA tool (P = 0.04).

Conclusion

The present study showed the high prevalence of malnutrition in GC patients on admission. At diagnosis, PG-SGA should be applied to screen nutritional status, and based on this tool results, proper nutritional interventions should be implemented to improve nutritional status in patients with GC.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Human Nutrition and Metabolism
Human Nutrition and Metabolism Agricultural and Biological Sciences-Food Science
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
30
审稿时长
188 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信