[上颌前牙种植体两个基台与单冠的临床美学效果比较]。

Q4 Medicine
N Wang, M M Yang, W Qin
{"title":"[上颌前牙种植体两个基台与单冠的临床美学效果比较]。","authors":"N Wang, M M Yang, W Qin","doi":"10.3760/cma.j.cn112144-20240219-00078","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Objective:</b> To compare and evaluate the clinical esthetic effect of angle screw channel abutment and personalized zirconia adhesive abutment for single crown restoration in esthetic area. <b>Methods:</b> A total of 44 patients (21 males and 23 females), aged (37.4±13.5) years (18-67 years) who completed single crown restoration in the esthetic area of the Department of Oral Implantology, Dalian Stomatological Hospital from January 2018 to June 2022 were retrospectively selected. A total of 44 implants were inserted. According to the abutment selected for final restoration, the patients were divided into angle screw channel abutment group and personalized zirconia bonding abutment group, with 22 patients and 22 implants in each group. The implant survival rate, complication rate, pink and white esthetic score and marginal bone resorption were compared between the two groups. <b>Results:</b> Follow-up to 12 months after final restoration, implant survival rates were 100% (22/22) in both groups, and there was no statistically significant difference in the incidence of mechanical complications between the two groups [9% (2/22) in the angle screw channel abutment group and 0(0/22) in the personalized zirconia bonding abutment group, χ<sup>2</sup>=2.10, <i>P=</i>0.148]. In the follow-up appointment 12 months after final restoration, the pink esthetic score of the angle screw channel abutment group (12.95±1.05) was significantly better than that of the personalized zirconia bonding abutment group (11.45±2.02) (<i>t=</i>3.10, <i>P=</i>0.003). There was no significant difference in white esthetic scores between the two groups (<i>t=</i>1.27, <i>P=</i>0.212). There was no significant difference in the marginal bone resorption between the two groups (<i>t=</i>0.32, <i>P=</i>0.749). <b>Conclusions:</b> When a single implant supported restoration is delivered in the esthetic area of the anterior maxilla, high implant survival rate and stability of the marginal bone can be obtained by using the angle screw channel abutment or the personalized zirconia bonding abutment. The clinical efficacy of the angle screw channel system is reliable, and it will provide clinicians with a new treatment option.</p>","PeriodicalId":23965,"journal":{"name":"中华口腔医学杂志","volume":"59 6","pages":"571-577"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"[Comparison of clinical esthetic effects of two abutments of maxillary anterior dental implants with single crown].\",\"authors\":\"N Wang, M M Yang, W Qin\",\"doi\":\"10.3760/cma.j.cn112144-20240219-00078\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b>Objective:</b> To compare and evaluate the clinical esthetic effect of angle screw channel abutment and personalized zirconia adhesive abutment for single crown restoration in esthetic area. <b>Methods:</b> A total of 44 patients (21 males and 23 females), aged (37.4±13.5) years (18-67 years) who completed single crown restoration in the esthetic area of the Department of Oral Implantology, Dalian Stomatological Hospital from January 2018 to June 2022 were retrospectively selected. A total of 44 implants were inserted. According to the abutment selected for final restoration, the patients were divided into angle screw channel abutment group and personalized zirconia bonding abutment group, with 22 patients and 22 implants in each group. The implant survival rate, complication rate, pink and white esthetic score and marginal bone resorption were compared between the two groups. <b>Results:</b> Follow-up to 12 months after final restoration, implant survival rates were 100% (22/22) in both groups, and there was no statistically significant difference in the incidence of mechanical complications between the two groups [9% (2/22) in the angle screw channel abutment group and 0(0/22) in the personalized zirconia bonding abutment group, χ<sup>2</sup>=2.10, <i>P=</i>0.148]. In the follow-up appointment 12 months after final restoration, the pink esthetic score of the angle screw channel abutment group (12.95±1.05) was significantly better than that of the personalized zirconia bonding abutment group (11.45±2.02) (<i>t=</i>3.10, <i>P=</i>0.003). There was no significant difference in white esthetic scores between the two groups (<i>t=</i>1.27, <i>P=</i>0.212). There was no significant difference in the marginal bone resorption between the two groups (<i>t=</i>0.32, <i>P=</i>0.749). <b>Conclusions:</b> When a single implant supported restoration is delivered in the esthetic area of the anterior maxilla, high implant survival rate and stability of the marginal bone can be obtained by using the angle screw channel abutment or the personalized zirconia bonding abutment. The clinical efficacy of the angle screw channel system is reliable, and it will provide clinicians with a new treatment option.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23965,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"中华口腔医学杂志\",\"volume\":\"59 6\",\"pages\":\"571-577\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"中华口腔医学杂志\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.cn112144-20240219-00078\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"中华口腔医学杂志","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.cn112144-20240219-00078","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的比较和评价角螺丝槽基台和个性化氧化锆粘接基台在单冠修复美学区域的临床美学效果。方法回顾性选取大连市口腔医院口腔种植科2018年1月-2022年6月完成美学区单冠修复的患者共44例(男21例,女23例),年龄(37.4±13.5)岁(18-67岁)。共植入 44 个种植体。根据最终修复选择的基台,将患者分为角螺丝槽基台组和个性化氧化锆粘结基台组,每组22例患者,22颗种植体。比较两组患者的种植体存活率、并发症发生率、粉白色美学评分和边缘骨吸收情况。结果:随访至最终修复后12个月,两组患者的种植体存活率均为100%(22/22),两组患者的机械并发症发生率差异无统计学意义[角螺丝通道基台组为9%(2/22),个性化氧化锆粘结基台组为0(0/22),χ2=2.10,P=0.148]。在最终修复12个月后的随访中,角螺丝通道基台组(12.95±1.05)的粉红色美学评分明显优于个性化氧化锆粘结基台组(11.45±2.02)(t=3.10,P=0.003)。两组的白色美学评分无明显差异(t=1.27,P=0.212)。两组的边缘骨吸收无明显差异(t=0.32,P=0.749)。结论在上颌前牙美学区域进行单种植体支持修复时,使用角螺丝槽基台或个性化氧化锆粘结基台可以获得较高的种植体存活率和边缘骨稳定性。角螺丝通道系统的临床疗效可靠,将为临床医生提供一种新的治疗选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
[Comparison of clinical esthetic effects of two abutments of maxillary anterior dental implants with single crown].

Objective: To compare and evaluate the clinical esthetic effect of angle screw channel abutment and personalized zirconia adhesive abutment for single crown restoration in esthetic area. Methods: A total of 44 patients (21 males and 23 females), aged (37.4±13.5) years (18-67 years) who completed single crown restoration in the esthetic area of the Department of Oral Implantology, Dalian Stomatological Hospital from January 2018 to June 2022 were retrospectively selected. A total of 44 implants were inserted. According to the abutment selected for final restoration, the patients were divided into angle screw channel abutment group and personalized zirconia bonding abutment group, with 22 patients and 22 implants in each group. The implant survival rate, complication rate, pink and white esthetic score and marginal bone resorption were compared between the two groups. Results: Follow-up to 12 months after final restoration, implant survival rates were 100% (22/22) in both groups, and there was no statistically significant difference in the incidence of mechanical complications between the two groups [9% (2/22) in the angle screw channel abutment group and 0(0/22) in the personalized zirconia bonding abutment group, χ2=2.10, P=0.148]. In the follow-up appointment 12 months after final restoration, the pink esthetic score of the angle screw channel abutment group (12.95±1.05) was significantly better than that of the personalized zirconia bonding abutment group (11.45±2.02) (t=3.10, P=0.003). There was no significant difference in white esthetic scores between the two groups (t=1.27, P=0.212). There was no significant difference in the marginal bone resorption between the two groups (t=0.32, P=0.749). Conclusions: When a single implant supported restoration is delivered in the esthetic area of the anterior maxilla, high implant survival rate and stability of the marginal bone can be obtained by using the angle screw channel abutment or the personalized zirconia bonding abutment. The clinical efficacy of the angle screw channel system is reliable, and it will provide clinicians with a new treatment option.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
中华口腔医学杂志
中华口腔医学杂志 Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
9692
期刊介绍: Founded in August 1953, Chinese Journal of Stomatology is a monthly academic journal of stomatology published publicly at home and abroad, sponsored by the Chinese Medical Association and co-sponsored by the Chinese Stomatology Association. It mainly reports the leading scientific research results and clinical diagnosis and treatment experience in the field of oral medicine, as well as the basic theoretical research that has a guiding role in oral clinical practice and is closely combined with oral clinical practice. Chinese Journal of Over the years, Stomatology has been published in Medline, Scopus database, Toxicology Abstracts Database, Chemical Abstracts Database, American Cancer database, Russian Abstracts database, China Core Journal of Science and Technology, Peking University Core Journal, CSCD and other more than 20 important journals at home and abroad Physical medicine database and retrieval system included.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信