统一校准 D-二聚体可提高不同检测系统的一致性

IF 1.7 Q3 MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY
Kun Wang , Xinwei Zang , Wenjie Zhang , Xiangyu Cao , Huiru Zhao , Chunyan Li , Cuiying Liang , Jun Wu
{"title":"统一校准 D-二聚体可提高不同检测系统的一致性","authors":"Kun Wang ,&nbsp;Xinwei Zang ,&nbsp;Wenjie Zhang ,&nbsp;Xiangyu Cao ,&nbsp;Huiru Zhao ,&nbsp;Chunyan Li ,&nbsp;Cuiying Liang ,&nbsp;Jun Wu","doi":"10.1016/j.plabm.2024.e00413","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>D-dimer at a low level is important evidence for excluding the onset and progression of thrombosis. It is readily detectable and yields rapid results, although significant variability exists among different detection systems. Our study aims to enhance the consistency across various detection systems.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Twelve detection systems were included in our study. We sought to address this inconsistency by using various calibrators (two supplied by manufacturers and two comprising pooled human plasma diluted with different diluents) to standardize D-dimer measurements. We categorized the data into three groups according to D-dimer concentration levels: low (≤0.5 mg/L), medium (&gt;0.5 mg/L - &lt;3 mg/L), and high (≥3 mg/L). We then analyzed the data focusing on range, consistency, comparability, negative coincidence rate, and false negative rate.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Calibrating with pooled human plasma led to narrower result ranges in the low and medium groups (P &lt; 0.05). In the low group, consistency improved from weak to strong (ICC 0.4–0.7, P﹤0.05), while it remained excellent in the other groups and overall (ICC﹥0.75, P﹤0.05). The percentage of pairwise comparability increased in both the low and high groups. Additionally, there was an increase in the negative coincidence rate.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>These findings demonstrate that uniform calibration of D-dimer can significantly enhance the consistency of results across different detection systems.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":20421,"journal":{"name":"Practical Laboratory Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352551724000593/pdfft?md5=df6911df6a73af616b3526357832c179&pid=1-s2.0-S2352551724000593-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Unified calibration of D-dimer can improve the uniformity of different detection systems\",\"authors\":\"Kun Wang ,&nbsp;Xinwei Zang ,&nbsp;Wenjie Zhang ,&nbsp;Xiangyu Cao ,&nbsp;Huiru Zhao ,&nbsp;Chunyan Li ,&nbsp;Cuiying Liang ,&nbsp;Jun Wu\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.plabm.2024.e00413\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>D-dimer at a low level is important evidence for excluding the onset and progression of thrombosis. It is readily detectable and yields rapid results, although significant variability exists among different detection systems. Our study aims to enhance the consistency across various detection systems.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Twelve detection systems were included in our study. We sought to address this inconsistency by using various calibrators (two supplied by manufacturers and two comprising pooled human plasma diluted with different diluents) to standardize D-dimer measurements. We categorized the data into three groups according to D-dimer concentration levels: low (≤0.5 mg/L), medium (&gt;0.5 mg/L - &lt;3 mg/L), and high (≥3 mg/L). We then analyzed the data focusing on range, consistency, comparability, negative coincidence rate, and false negative rate.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Calibrating with pooled human plasma led to narrower result ranges in the low and medium groups (P &lt; 0.05). In the low group, consistency improved from weak to strong (ICC 0.4–0.7, P﹤0.05), while it remained excellent in the other groups and overall (ICC﹥0.75, P﹤0.05). The percentage of pairwise comparability increased in both the low and high groups. Additionally, there was an increase in the negative coincidence rate.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>These findings demonstrate that uniform calibration of D-dimer can significantly enhance the consistency of results across different detection systems.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20421,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Practical Laboratory Medicine\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352551724000593/pdfft?md5=df6911df6a73af616b3526357832c179&pid=1-s2.0-S2352551724000593-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Practical Laboratory Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352551724000593\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Practical Laboratory Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352551724000593","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景低水平二聚体是排除血栓开始和发展的重要证据。尽管不同的检测系统之间存在很大差异,但二聚体很容易被检测到,而且能快速得出结果。我们的研究旨在提高不同检测系统之间的一致性。为了解决这种不一致性,我们使用了不同的校准物(两种由生产商提供,两种由用不同稀释剂稀释的集合人血浆组成)来标准化 D-二聚体的测量。我们根据 D-二聚体浓度水平将数据分为三组:低(≤0.5 mg/L)、中(0.5 mg/L - 3 mg/L)和高(≥3 mg/L)。然后,我们对数据进行了分析,重点关注范围、一致性、可比性、阴性重合率和假阴性率。结果用集合人血浆校准后,低组和中组的结果范围更窄(P <0.05)。在低组中,一致性由弱变强(ICC 0.4-0.7,P﹤0.05),而在其他组和总体中,一致性仍然很好(ICC﹥0.75,P﹤0.05)。在低分组和高分组中,配对可比性的百分比都有所增加。结论这些研究结果表明,D-二聚体的统一校准可显著提高不同检测系统结果的一致性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Unified calibration of D-dimer can improve the uniformity of different detection systems

Background

D-dimer at a low level is important evidence for excluding the onset and progression of thrombosis. It is readily detectable and yields rapid results, although significant variability exists among different detection systems. Our study aims to enhance the consistency across various detection systems.

Methods

Twelve detection systems were included in our study. We sought to address this inconsistency by using various calibrators (two supplied by manufacturers and two comprising pooled human plasma diluted with different diluents) to standardize D-dimer measurements. We categorized the data into three groups according to D-dimer concentration levels: low (≤0.5 mg/L), medium (>0.5 mg/L - <3 mg/L), and high (≥3 mg/L). We then analyzed the data focusing on range, consistency, comparability, negative coincidence rate, and false negative rate.

Results

Calibrating with pooled human plasma led to narrower result ranges in the low and medium groups (P < 0.05). In the low group, consistency improved from weak to strong (ICC 0.4–0.7, P﹤0.05), while it remained excellent in the other groups and overall (ICC﹥0.75, P﹤0.05). The percentage of pairwise comparability increased in both the low and high groups. Additionally, there was an increase in the negative coincidence rate.

Conclusion

These findings demonstrate that uniform calibration of D-dimer can significantly enhance the consistency of results across different detection systems.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Practical Laboratory Medicine
Practical Laboratory Medicine Health Professions-Radiological and Ultrasound Technology
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
40
审稿时长
7 weeks
期刊介绍: Practical Laboratory Medicine is a high-quality, peer-reviewed, international open-access journal publishing original research, new methods and critical evaluations, case reports and short papers in the fields of clinical chemistry and laboratory medicine. The objective of the journal is to provide practical information of immediate relevance to workers in clinical laboratories. The primary scope of the journal covers clinical chemistry, hematology, molecular biology and genetics relevant to laboratory medicine, microbiology, immunology, therapeutic drug monitoring and toxicology, laboratory management and informatics. We welcome papers which describe critical evaluations of biomarkers and their role in the diagnosis and treatment of clinically significant disease, validation of commercial and in-house IVD methods, method comparisons, interference reports, the development of new reagents and reference materials, reference range studies and regulatory compliance reports. Manuscripts describing the development of new methods applicable to laboratory medicine (including point-of-care testing) are particularly encouraged, even if preliminary or small scale.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信