属于 2020 年 FDA 自愿性现场纠正行动范围内的人工耳蜗植入设备故障:系统回顾与元分析》。

IF 1.9 3区 医学 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Aparna Govindan, Mia Saade, Enrique R Perez, George B Wanna, Maura K Cosetti, Zachary G Schwam
{"title":"属于 2020 年 FDA 自愿性现场纠正行动范围内的人工耳蜗植入设备故障:系统回顾与元分析》。","authors":"Aparna Govindan, Mia Saade, Enrique R Perez, George B Wanna, Maura K Cosetti, Zachary G Schwam","doi":"10.1097/MAO.0000000000004224","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To compare the rate of device failure for those cochlear implants (CIs) involved in the 2020 Food and Drug Administration (FDA) voluntary field corrective action (VFCA).</p><p><strong>Databases reviewed: </strong>Medline, Embase, and Scopus.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic review was performed according to the PRISMA guidelines. Publications reporting institutional experiences with implants affected by the VFCA were included. Outcomes assessed included etiology of, rate of, and time to failure and pre-/post-device failure speech perception testing. All outcomes reported in at least two independent studies were included in a meta-analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Six studies met criteria for analysis. The overall pooled failure rate was 23.7% (95% CI, 11.6-38.4%). The pooled device, inconclusive, and medical failure rates were 21.5%, 0.2%, and 0.7%, respectively. Pediatric failure rates were higher than those of adults (46.9% [95% CI, 11.2-84.5%] versus 32.6% [95% CI, 8.2-63.7%]). WRS declined with primary implant failure (55.1% [95% CI, 48.0-62.1%] to 34.1% [95% CI, 30.2-38.0%]) but improved after reimplantation (34.1% [95% CI, 30.2-38.0%] to 50.1% [95% CI, 45.2-55.1%]).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The rate of pooled reported failure for CIs falling under the 2020 VFCA in the literature thus far is 23.7%. The overwhelming majority of these failures were device related, the rates of which were higher in children. Speech perception improved significantly after reimplantation.</p>","PeriodicalId":19732,"journal":{"name":"Otology & Neurotology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Cochlear Implant Device Failures Falling Under the 2020 FDA Voluntary Field Corrective Action: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Aparna Govindan, Mia Saade, Enrique R Perez, George B Wanna, Maura K Cosetti, Zachary G Schwam\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/MAO.0000000000004224\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To compare the rate of device failure for those cochlear implants (CIs) involved in the 2020 Food and Drug Administration (FDA) voluntary field corrective action (VFCA).</p><p><strong>Databases reviewed: </strong>Medline, Embase, and Scopus.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic review was performed according to the PRISMA guidelines. Publications reporting institutional experiences with implants affected by the VFCA were included. Outcomes assessed included etiology of, rate of, and time to failure and pre-/post-device failure speech perception testing. All outcomes reported in at least two independent studies were included in a meta-analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Six studies met criteria for analysis. The overall pooled failure rate was 23.7% (95% CI, 11.6-38.4%). The pooled device, inconclusive, and medical failure rates were 21.5%, 0.2%, and 0.7%, respectively. Pediatric failure rates were higher than those of adults (46.9% [95% CI, 11.2-84.5%] versus 32.6% [95% CI, 8.2-63.7%]). WRS declined with primary implant failure (55.1% [95% CI, 48.0-62.1%] to 34.1% [95% CI, 30.2-38.0%]) but improved after reimplantation (34.1% [95% CI, 30.2-38.0%] to 50.1% [95% CI, 45.2-55.1%]).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The rate of pooled reported failure for CIs falling under the 2020 VFCA in the literature thus far is 23.7%. The overwhelming majority of these failures were device related, the rates of which were higher in children. Speech perception improved significantly after reimplantation.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19732,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Otology & Neurotology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Otology & Neurotology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/MAO.0000000000004224\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Otology & Neurotology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/MAO.0000000000004224","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的比较 2020 年美国食品和药物管理局(FDA)自愿现场纠正行动(VFCA)中涉及的人工耳蜗(CI)的设备故障率:Medline、Embase 和 Scopus:方法:根据 PRISMA 指南进行系统综述。方法:根据 PRISMA 指南进行了一项系统性综述,纳入了报告受 VFCA 影响的植入物的机构经验的文献。评估的结果包括故障病因、故障率、故障时间以及设备故障前后的言语感知测试。至少两项独立研究中报告的所有结果均纳入荟萃分析:结果:六项研究符合分析标准。总体合并失败率为 23.7%(95% CI,11.6-38.4%)。汇总的设备、不确定和医疗失败率分别为 21.5%、0.2% 和 0.7%。儿科失败率高于成人(46.9% [95% CI, 11.2-84.5%] 对 32.6% [95% CI, 8.2-63.7%])。WRS随初次种植失败而下降(从55.1% [95% CI, 48.0-62.1%]降至34.1% [95% CI, 30.2-38.0%]),但在再次种植后有所改善(从34.1% [95% CI, 30.2-38.0%]降至50.1% [95% CI, 45.2-55.1%]):结论:迄今为止,文献报道的 2020 VFCA 下的 CI 失败率为 23.7%。其中绝大多数失败与设备有关,儿童的失败率更高。重新植入后,语音感知明显改善。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Cochlear Implant Device Failures Falling Under the 2020 FDA Voluntary Field Corrective Action: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Objective: To compare the rate of device failure for those cochlear implants (CIs) involved in the 2020 Food and Drug Administration (FDA) voluntary field corrective action (VFCA).

Databases reviewed: Medline, Embase, and Scopus.

Methods: A systematic review was performed according to the PRISMA guidelines. Publications reporting institutional experiences with implants affected by the VFCA were included. Outcomes assessed included etiology of, rate of, and time to failure and pre-/post-device failure speech perception testing. All outcomes reported in at least two independent studies were included in a meta-analysis.

Results: Six studies met criteria for analysis. The overall pooled failure rate was 23.7% (95% CI, 11.6-38.4%). The pooled device, inconclusive, and medical failure rates were 21.5%, 0.2%, and 0.7%, respectively. Pediatric failure rates were higher than those of adults (46.9% [95% CI, 11.2-84.5%] versus 32.6% [95% CI, 8.2-63.7%]). WRS declined with primary implant failure (55.1% [95% CI, 48.0-62.1%] to 34.1% [95% CI, 30.2-38.0%]) but improved after reimplantation (34.1% [95% CI, 30.2-38.0%] to 50.1% [95% CI, 45.2-55.1%]).

Conclusions: The rate of pooled reported failure for CIs falling under the 2020 VFCA in the literature thus far is 23.7%. The overwhelming majority of these failures were device related, the rates of which were higher in children. Speech perception improved significantly after reimplantation.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Otology & Neurotology
Otology & Neurotology 医学-耳鼻喉科学
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
14.30%
发文量
509
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: ​​​​​Otology & Neurotology publishes original articles relating to both clinical and basic science aspects of otology, neurotology, and cranial base surgery. As the foremost journal in its field, it has become the favored place for publishing the best of new science relating to the human ear and its diseases. The broadly international character of its contributing authors, editorial board, and readership provides the Journal its decidedly global perspective.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信