军队医疗系统中按摩疗法的使用情况。

IF 1.2 4区 医学 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Tracy L Rupp, Maxwell Amoako, Kevin Johnson, Winifred Rojas, Krista B Highland
{"title":"军队医疗系统中按摩疗法的使用情况。","authors":"Tracy L Rupp, Maxwell Amoako, Kevin Johnson, Winifred Rojas, Krista B Highland","doi":"10.1093/milmed/usae299","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Massage therapy is an evidence-based approach for pain management. Information regarding its utilization in the Military Health System (MHS) is lacking. The goal of this study is to evaluate massage therapy utilization patterns across the MHS to include who receives (patient characteristics and diagnoses) and provides (e.g., massage therapists) massage therapy and where (e.g., clinic type).</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Medical record data of adult TRICARE Prime enrollees receiving outpatient massage therapy (Current Procedural Terminology codes: 97124 and 97140) from June 1, 2021, to May 31, 2023, were extracted from the MHS Data Repository. After identifying the index massage therapy visit, records for 6 months pre- and post-index were included. Descriptive statistics described massage therapy utilization patterns overall. Bivariate analysis compared patients who received massage therapy from massage therapists versus nonmassage therapist clinicians.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of patients who received massage therapy (n = 179,215), the median number of visits was 2 (interquartile range 1 to 4), the median age was 32 years (interquartile range 25 to 40), they were mostly assigned male (72%), White (53%), Senior Enlisted (51%), with a musculoskeletal diagnosis (90%), and recent non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) prescription (58%). Massage therapy was primarily delivered by physical therapists (49%) in physical therapy clinics (74%). Massage therapists provided 0.2% of massage therapy. Patients who received massage therapy from massage therapists versus nonmassage therapists significantly varied across several patient and care characteristics.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>While massage therapy codes are documented frequently, massage therapists do not commonly provide massage therapy relative to nonmassage therapist providers. Access to massage therapists may be stymied by both lack of massage therapists and need for tertiary pain management referrals to access massage therapist-delivered care. Future research will leverage a health equity framework to (1) evaluate accessibility to massage therapy provided by massage therapists and (2) evaluate real-world evidence of massage therapy effectiveness.</p>","PeriodicalId":18638,"journal":{"name":"Military Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"e20-e26"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Massage Therapy Utilization in the Military Health System.\",\"authors\":\"Tracy L Rupp, Maxwell Amoako, Kevin Johnson, Winifred Rojas, Krista B Highland\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/milmed/usae299\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Massage therapy is an evidence-based approach for pain management. Information regarding its utilization in the Military Health System (MHS) is lacking. The goal of this study is to evaluate massage therapy utilization patterns across the MHS to include who receives (patient characteristics and diagnoses) and provides (e.g., massage therapists) massage therapy and where (e.g., clinic type).</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Medical record data of adult TRICARE Prime enrollees receiving outpatient massage therapy (Current Procedural Terminology codes: 97124 and 97140) from June 1, 2021, to May 31, 2023, were extracted from the MHS Data Repository. After identifying the index massage therapy visit, records for 6 months pre- and post-index were included. Descriptive statistics described massage therapy utilization patterns overall. Bivariate analysis compared patients who received massage therapy from massage therapists versus nonmassage therapist clinicians.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of patients who received massage therapy (n = 179,215), the median number of visits was 2 (interquartile range 1 to 4), the median age was 32 years (interquartile range 25 to 40), they were mostly assigned male (72%), White (53%), Senior Enlisted (51%), with a musculoskeletal diagnosis (90%), and recent non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) prescription (58%). Massage therapy was primarily delivered by physical therapists (49%) in physical therapy clinics (74%). Massage therapists provided 0.2% of massage therapy. Patients who received massage therapy from massage therapists versus nonmassage therapists significantly varied across several patient and care characteristics.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>While massage therapy codes are documented frequently, massage therapists do not commonly provide massage therapy relative to nonmassage therapist providers. Access to massage therapists may be stymied by both lack of massage therapists and need for tertiary pain management referrals to access massage therapist-delivered care. Future research will leverage a health equity framework to (1) evaluate accessibility to massage therapy provided by massage therapists and (2) evaluate real-world evidence of massage therapy effectiveness.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":18638,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Military Medicine\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"e20-e26\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Military Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/milmed/usae299\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Military Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/milmed/usae299","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

介绍:按摩疗法是一种以证据为基础的疼痛治疗方法。有关其在军事医疗系统(MHS)中使用情况的信息尚缺。本研究的目的是评估整个军事医疗系统的按摩疗法使用模式,包括接受按摩疗法的人(患者特征和诊断)和提供按摩疗法的人(如按摩师)以及提供按摩疗法的地点(如诊所类型):从 MHS 数据存储库中提取了 2021 年 6 月 1 日至 2023 年 5 月 31 日期间接受门诊按摩治疗(当前程序术语代码:97124 和 97140)的 TRICARE Prime 成年参保者的病历数据。在确定指数按摩治疗就诊后,纳入了指数前后 6 个月的记录。描述性统计描述了按摩疗法的总体使用模式。双变量分析比较了接受按摩治疗师和非按摩治疗师按摩治疗的患者:在接受按摩治疗的患者(n = 179,215 人)中,就诊次数中位数为 2 次(四分位数间距为 1 到 4 次),年龄中位数为 32 岁(四分位数间距为 25 到 40 岁),大多数为男性(72%)、白人(53%)、高级士兵(51%),有肌肉骨骼疾病诊断(90%),最近开过非甾体抗炎药(NSAID)处方(58%)。按摩疗法主要由理疗师(49%)在理疗诊所(74%)提供。按摩治疗师提供的按摩治疗占 0.2%。接受按摩治疗师提供的按摩治疗的患者与未接受按摩治疗师提供的按摩治疗的患者在多个患者和护理特征方面存在显著差异:结论:虽然按摩治疗代码经常被记录在案,但与非按摩治疗师提供者相比,按摩治疗师提供的按摩治疗并不常见。按摩治疗师的缺乏和需要三级疼痛管理转诊才能获得按摩治疗师提供的护理服务可能会阻碍按摩治疗师的使用。未来的研究将利用健康公平框架来(1)评估按摩治疗师提供按摩治疗的可及性;(2)评估按摩治疗有效性的现实证据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Massage Therapy Utilization in the Military Health System.

Introduction: Massage therapy is an evidence-based approach for pain management. Information regarding its utilization in the Military Health System (MHS) is lacking. The goal of this study is to evaluate massage therapy utilization patterns across the MHS to include who receives (patient characteristics and diagnoses) and provides (e.g., massage therapists) massage therapy and where (e.g., clinic type).

Materials and methods: Medical record data of adult TRICARE Prime enrollees receiving outpatient massage therapy (Current Procedural Terminology codes: 97124 and 97140) from June 1, 2021, to May 31, 2023, were extracted from the MHS Data Repository. After identifying the index massage therapy visit, records for 6 months pre- and post-index were included. Descriptive statistics described massage therapy utilization patterns overall. Bivariate analysis compared patients who received massage therapy from massage therapists versus nonmassage therapist clinicians.

Results: Of patients who received massage therapy (n = 179,215), the median number of visits was 2 (interquartile range 1 to 4), the median age was 32 years (interquartile range 25 to 40), they were mostly assigned male (72%), White (53%), Senior Enlisted (51%), with a musculoskeletal diagnosis (90%), and recent non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) prescription (58%). Massage therapy was primarily delivered by physical therapists (49%) in physical therapy clinics (74%). Massage therapists provided 0.2% of massage therapy. Patients who received massage therapy from massage therapists versus nonmassage therapists significantly varied across several patient and care characteristics.

Conclusions: While massage therapy codes are documented frequently, massage therapists do not commonly provide massage therapy relative to nonmassage therapist providers. Access to massage therapists may be stymied by both lack of massage therapists and need for tertiary pain management referrals to access massage therapist-delivered care. Future research will leverage a health equity framework to (1) evaluate accessibility to massage therapy provided by massage therapists and (2) evaluate real-world evidence of massage therapy effectiveness.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Military Medicine
Military Medicine MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
8.30%
发文量
393
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Military Medicine is the official international journal of AMSUS. Articles published in the journal are peer-reviewed scientific papers, case reports, and editorials. The journal also publishes letters to the editor. The objective of the journal is to promote awareness of federal medicine by providing a forum for responsible discussion of common ideas and problems relevant to federal healthcare. Its mission is: To increase healthcare education by providing scientific and other information to its readers; to facilitate communication; and to offer a prestige publication for members’ writings.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信