在一项模拟研究中,方法上的人为因素导致了反直觉的进化结论。

IF 7.6 1区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ECOLOGY
Ecology Letters Pub Date : 2024-06-12 DOI:10.1111/ele.14439
Loke von Schmalensee, Mats Ittonen, Anna Brødsgaard Shoshan, Kevin T. Roberts, Isabelle Siemers, Philip Süess, Christer Wiklund, Karl Gotthard
{"title":"在一项模拟研究中,方法上的人为因素导致了反直觉的进化结论。","authors":"Loke von Schmalensee,&nbsp;Mats Ittonen,&nbsp;Anna Brødsgaard Shoshan,&nbsp;Kevin T. Roberts,&nbsp;Isabelle Siemers,&nbsp;Philip Süess,&nbsp;Christer Wiklund,&nbsp;Karl Gotthard","doi":"10.1111/ele.14439","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>In their simulation study, Garcia-Costoya et al. (2023) conclude that evolutionary constraints might aid populations facing climate change. However, we are concerned that this conclusion is largely a consequence of the simulated temperature variation being too small, and, most importantly, that uneven limitations to standing variation disadvantage unconstrained populations.</p>","PeriodicalId":161,"journal":{"name":"Ecology Letters","volume":"27 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":7.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/ele.14439","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Methodological artefacts cause counter-intuitive evolutionary conclusions in a simulation study\",\"authors\":\"Loke von Schmalensee,&nbsp;Mats Ittonen,&nbsp;Anna Brødsgaard Shoshan,&nbsp;Kevin T. Roberts,&nbsp;Isabelle Siemers,&nbsp;Philip Süess,&nbsp;Christer Wiklund,&nbsp;Karl Gotthard\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/ele.14439\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>In their simulation study, Garcia-Costoya et al. (2023) conclude that evolutionary constraints might aid populations facing climate change. However, we are concerned that this conclusion is largely a consequence of the simulated temperature variation being too small, and, most importantly, that uneven limitations to standing variation disadvantage unconstrained populations.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":161,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ecology Letters\",\"volume\":\"27 6\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/ele.14439\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ecology Letters\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ele.14439\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ecology Letters","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ele.14439","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

加西亚-科斯托亚等人(2023年)在模拟研究中得出结论,进化限制可能会帮助面临气候变化的种群。然而,我们担心的是,这一结论在很大程度上是由于模拟的温度变化太小造成的,最重要的是,对常年变化的不均衡限制不利于未受限制的种群。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Methodological artefacts cause counter-intuitive evolutionary conclusions in a simulation study

Methodological artefacts cause counter-intuitive evolutionary conclusions in a simulation study

In their simulation study, Garcia-Costoya et al. (2023) conclude that evolutionary constraints might aid populations facing climate change. However, we are concerned that this conclusion is largely a consequence of the simulated temperature variation being too small, and, most importantly, that uneven limitations to standing variation disadvantage unconstrained populations.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Ecology Letters
Ecology Letters 环境科学-生态学
CiteScore
17.60
自引率
3.40%
发文量
201
审稿时长
1.8 months
期刊介绍: Ecology Letters serves as a platform for the rapid publication of innovative research in ecology. It considers manuscripts across all taxa, biomes, and geographic regions, prioritizing papers that investigate clearly stated hypotheses. The journal publishes concise papers of high originality and general interest, contributing to new developments in ecology. Purely descriptive papers and those that only confirm or extend previous results are discouraged.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信