中国继续医学教育/继续职业发展体系概览:混合方法评估》。

Journal of CME Pub Date : 2024-06-09 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1080/28338073.2024.2363855
Lawrence Sherman, Ming Kuang, Da-Ya David Yang, Kathy Chappell
{"title":"中国继续医学教育/继续职业发展体系概览:混合方法评估》。","authors":"Lawrence Sherman, Ming Kuang, Da-Ya David Yang, Kathy Chappell","doi":"10.1080/28338073.2024.2363855","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Aims of this assessment were to describe requirements for physicians to engage in CME/CPD; explore perceptions of In-Country SMEs of their CME/CPD systems; describe perceptions of In-Country physicians about interprofessional continuing education (IPCE) and independent CME/CPD; and provide recommendations that may be adopted to improve quality and effectiveness. This assessment used a mixed-methods approach that included 1:1 interviews with in-country subject matter experts and an electronic survey capturing qualitative and quantitative data from practicing in-country physicians. This assessment reflects a country invested in the education of its physician workforce. CME/CPD systems have embedded governance structures, organizations authorized to provide education, and a recognized credit system. Governing bodies have implemented regulations to limit influence from commercial interest organizations on CME/CPD, and there is opportunity to expand delivery systems to reach physicians across diverse geographic regions, better align content to individual physicians' gaps and learning needs, and reduce cost. There is opportunity to invest in IPCE within a country with a strong professional hierarchy system. This assessment reflects CME/CPD systems that are relatively mature and identifies several opportunities to expand and enhance systems to better meet educational needs of physicians and to positively impact practice and patient outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":73675,"journal":{"name":"Journal of CME","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11164035/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"An Overview of Continuing Medical Education/Continuing Professional Development Systems in China: A Mixed Methods Assessment.\",\"authors\":\"Lawrence Sherman, Ming Kuang, Da-Ya David Yang, Kathy Chappell\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/28338073.2024.2363855\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Aims of this assessment were to describe requirements for physicians to engage in CME/CPD; explore perceptions of In-Country SMEs of their CME/CPD systems; describe perceptions of In-Country physicians about interprofessional continuing education (IPCE) and independent CME/CPD; and provide recommendations that may be adopted to improve quality and effectiveness. This assessment used a mixed-methods approach that included 1:1 interviews with in-country subject matter experts and an electronic survey capturing qualitative and quantitative data from practicing in-country physicians. This assessment reflects a country invested in the education of its physician workforce. CME/CPD systems have embedded governance structures, organizations authorized to provide education, and a recognized credit system. Governing bodies have implemented regulations to limit influence from commercial interest organizations on CME/CPD, and there is opportunity to expand delivery systems to reach physicians across diverse geographic regions, better align content to individual physicians' gaps and learning needs, and reduce cost. There is opportunity to invest in IPCE within a country with a strong professional hierarchy system. This assessment reflects CME/CPD systems that are relatively mature and identifies several opportunities to expand and enhance systems to better meet educational needs of physicians and to positively impact practice and patient outcomes.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":73675,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of CME\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11164035/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of CME\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/28338073.2024.2363855\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of CME","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/28338073.2024.2363855","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

此次评估的目的是描述医生参与继续医学教育/继续职业发展的要求;探讨国内中小型企业对其继续医学教育/继续职业发展系统的看法;描述国内医生对跨专业继续教育(IPCE)和独立继续医学教育/继续职业发展的看法;并提供可采用的建议,以提高质量和效果。本次评估采用了混合方法,包括与国内主题专家进行一对一访谈,以及从国内执业医师处获取定性和定量数据的电子调查。这项评估反映了一个国家对其医生队伍教育的投入。继续医学教育/继续医学发展(CME/CPD)系统拥有嵌入式管理结构、授权提供教育的组织以及公认的学分系统。管理机构已实施法规,限制商业利益组织对继续医学教育/继续医学发展项目的影响,并有机会扩大交付系统,以覆盖不同地理区域的医生,更好地根据医生个人的差距和学习需求调整内容,并降低成本。在一个拥有强大专业分级系统的国家,投资 IPCE 是有机会的。本评估反映了相对成熟的继续医学教育/继续医学发展系统,并指出了一些扩大和加强系统的机会,以更好地满足医生的教育需求,并对实践和患者的治疗效果产生积极影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
An Overview of Continuing Medical Education/Continuing Professional Development Systems in China: A Mixed Methods Assessment.

Aims of this assessment were to describe requirements for physicians to engage in CME/CPD; explore perceptions of In-Country SMEs of their CME/CPD systems; describe perceptions of In-Country physicians about interprofessional continuing education (IPCE) and independent CME/CPD; and provide recommendations that may be adopted to improve quality and effectiveness. This assessment used a mixed-methods approach that included 1:1 interviews with in-country subject matter experts and an electronic survey capturing qualitative and quantitative data from practicing in-country physicians. This assessment reflects a country invested in the education of its physician workforce. CME/CPD systems have embedded governance structures, organizations authorized to provide education, and a recognized credit system. Governing bodies have implemented regulations to limit influence from commercial interest organizations on CME/CPD, and there is opportunity to expand delivery systems to reach physicians across diverse geographic regions, better align content to individual physicians' gaps and learning needs, and reduce cost. There is opportunity to invest in IPCE within a country with a strong professional hierarchy system. This assessment reflects CME/CPD systems that are relatively mature and identifies several opportunities to expand and enhance systems to better meet educational needs of physicians and to positively impact practice and patient outcomes.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信