开发新的快速反应事件审查程序,以提高质量。

IF 1.3 Q4 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Michael Osnard, Rebecca R Meredith, Kara Grace Leventhal, Sonia P Dalal, Timothy M Niessen, Gigi Liu, Rebecca Engels, Cora Lehet, Michael R Cox, Ashley Haas, Marissa Proffen, Maggie Chan, Benjamin E Bodnar
{"title":"开发新的快速反应事件审查程序,以提高质量。","authors":"Michael Osnard, Rebecca R Meredith, Kara Grace Leventhal, Sonia P Dalal, Timothy M Niessen, Gigi Liu, Rebecca Engels, Cora Lehet, Michael R Cox, Ashley Haas, Marissa Proffen, Maggie Chan, Benjamin E Bodnar","doi":"10.1136/bmjoq-2023-002664","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Rapid response team (RRT) and code activation events occur relatively commonly in inpatient settings. RRT systems have been the subject of a significant amount of analysis, although this has been largely focused on the impact of RRT system implementation and RRT events on patient outcomes. There is reason to believe that the structured assessment of RRT and code events may be an effective way to identify opportunities for system improvement, although no standardised approach to event analysis is widely accepted. We developed and refined a protocolised system of RRT and code event review, focused on sustainable, timely and high value event analysis meant to inform ongoing improvement activities.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A group of clinicians with expertise in process and quality improvement created a protocolised analytic plan for rapid response event review, piloted and then iteratively optimised a systematic process which was applied to all subsequent cases to be reviewed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Hospitalist reviewers were recruited and trained in a methodical approach. Each reviewer performed a chart review to summarise RRT events, and collect specific variables for each case (coding). Coding was then reviewed for concordance, at monthly interdisciplinary group meetings and 'Action Items' were identified and considered for implementation. In any 12-month period starting in 2021, approximately 12-15 distinct cases per month were reviewed and coded, offering ample opportunities to identify trends and patterns.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>We have developed an innovative process for ongoing review of RRT-Code events. The review process is easy to implement and has allowed for the timely identification of high value improvement opportunities.</p>","PeriodicalId":9052,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Open Quality","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11168121/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Development of a novel rapid response event review process for quality improvement.\",\"authors\":\"Michael Osnard, Rebecca R Meredith, Kara Grace Leventhal, Sonia P Dalal, Timothy M Niessen, Gigi Liu, Rebecca Engels, Cora Lehet, Michael R Cox, Ashley Haas, Marissa Proffen, Maggie Chan, Benjamin E Bodnar\",\"doi\":\"10.1136/bmjoq-2023-002664\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Rapid response team (RRT) and code activation events occur relatively commonly in inpatient settings. RRT systems have been the subject of a significant amount of analysis, although this has been largely focused on the impact of RRT system implementation and RRT events on patient outcomes. There is reason to believe that the structured assessment of RRT and code events may be an effective way to identify opportunities for system improvement, although no standardised approach to event analysis is widely accepted. We developed and refined a protocolised system of RRT and code event review, focused on sustainable, timely and high value event analysis meant to inform ongoing improvement activities.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A group of clinicians with expertise in process and quality improvement created a protocolised analytic plan for rapid response event review, piloted and then iteratively optimised a systematic process which was applied to all subsequent cases to be reviewed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Hospitalist reviewers were recruited and trained in a methodical approach. Each reviewer performed a chart review to summarise RRT events, and collect specific variables for each case (coding). Coding was then reviewed for concordance, at monthly interdisciplinary group meetings and 'Action Items' were identified and considered for implementation. In any 12-month period starting in 2021, approximately 12-15 distinct cases per month were reviewed and coded, offering ample opportunities to identify trends and patterns.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>We have developed an innovative process for ongoing review of RRT-Code events. The review process is easy to implement and has allowed for the timely identification of high value improvement opportunities.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9052,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BMJ Open Quality\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11168121/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BMJ Open Quality\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjoq-2023-002664\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMJ Open Quality","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjoq-2023-002664","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导言:快速反应小组(RRT)和代码激活事件在住院环境中较为常见。对 RRT 系统进行了大量分析,但主要集中在 RRT 系统实施和 RRT 事件对患者预后的影响上。我们有理由相信,对 RRT 和代码事件进行结构化评估可能是确定系统改进机会的有效方法,尽管事件分析的标准化方法尚未得到广泛认可。我们开发并完善了 RRT 和代码事件审查规程系统,重点关注可持续、及时和高价值的事件分析,以便为持续改进活动提供信息:一组在流程和质量改进方面具有专长的临床医生为快速反应事件审核制定了一套规范化的分析计划,并对该计划进行了试点,然后反复优化了系统流程,并将其应用于所有后续审核病例:结果: 招聘了医院评审员,并对他们进行了方法培训。每位审阅者都要进行病历审阅,总结 RRT 事件,并收集每个病例的特定变量(编码)。然后在每月的跨学科小组会议上审查编码是否一致,并确定 "行动项目",考虑是否实施。从 2021 年开始,在任何 12 个月的时间里,每月都会对大约 12-15 个不同的病例进行审查和编码,从而为确定趋势和模式提供了充分的机会:我们开发了一种创新流程,用于持续审查 RRT 代码事件。该审查流程易于实施,能够及时发现高价值的改进机会。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Development of a novel rapid response event review process for quality improvement.

Introduction: Rapid response team (RRT) and code activation events occur relatively commonly in inpatient settings. RRT systems have been the subject of a significant amount of analysis, although this has been largely focused on the impact of RRT system implementation and RRT events on patient outcomes. There is reason to believe that the structured assessment of RRT and code events may be an effective way to identify opportunities for system improvement, although no standardised approach to event analysis is widely accepted. We developed and refined a protocolised system of RRT and code event review, focused on sustainable, timely and high value event analysis meant to inform ongoing improvement activities.

Methods: A group of clinicians with expertise in process and quality improvement created a protocolised analytic plan for rapid response event review, piloted and then iteratively optimised a systematic process which was applied to all subsequent cases to be reviewed.

Results: Hospitalist reviewers were recruited and trained in a methodical approach. Each reviewer performed a chart review to summarise RRT events, and collect specific variables for each case (coding). Coding was then reviewed for concordance, at monthly interdisciplinary group meetings and 'Action Items' were identified and considered for implementation. In any 12-month period starting in 2021, approximately 12-15 distinct cases per month were reviewed and coded, offering ample opportunities to identify trends and patterns.

Conclusion: We have developed an innovative process for ongoing review of RRT-Code events. The review process is easy to implement and has allowed for the timely identification of high value improvement opportunities.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
BMJ Open Quality
BMJ Open Quality Nursing-Leadership and Management
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
226
审稿时长
20 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信