针对早期痴呆症患者的初级保健诊所协作护理模式:日本初级保健医生横断面调查》。

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
International Journal of Integrated Care Pub Date : 2024-06-03 eCollection Date: 2024-04-01 DOI:10.5334/ijic.7726
Shuji Tsuda, Junichiro Toya, Kae Ito
{"title":"针对早期痴呆症患者的初级保健诊所协作护理模式:日本初级保健医生横断面调查》。","authors":"Shuji Tsuda, Junichiro Toya, Kae Ito","doi":"10.5334/ijic.7726","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study explored collaboration models between primary care physicians (PCPs) and care managers (CMs) and assessed each model's potential in meeting the support needs of individuals with early-stage dementia.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In 2022, a cross-sectional survey was conducted among the PCPs in Tokyo. The data regarding the participant and clinic characteristics and daily practices for individuals with early-stage dementia were collected. The clinical collaborative practice was classified using a latent class analysis; comparisons were made between the identified classes based on 14 items in seven domains of support.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Two collaborative and one stand-alone models were identified. The former varied in the professionals' roles, with one led by PCPs and the other by CMs. We named them PCP-led, CM-led, and stand-alone models, accounting for 46.4%, 32.8%, and 20.6% of the clinics, respectively. The PCP-led clinics were significantly more likely to provide support than the stand-alone ones across five domains: cognitive function, care planning, carers' support, information, and social health. The CM-led model clinics generally fell between those of the other two models.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Different leadership styles exist in the PCP-CM collaborations in care delivery for people with early-stage dementia. This collaboration offers distinct advantages for clinics in addressing their needs.</p>","PeriodicalId":14049,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Integrated Care","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11160391/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Collaborative Care Models of Primary Care Clinics for People with Early-Stage Dementia: A Cross-Sectional Survey of Primary Care Physicians in Japan.\",\"authors\":\"Shuji Tsuda, Junichiro Toya, Kae Ito\",\"doi\":\"10.5334/ijic.7726\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study explored collaboration models between primary care physicians (PCPs) and care managers (CMs) and assessed each model's potential in meeting the support needs of individuals with early-stage dementia.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In 2022, a cross-sectional survey was conducted among the PCPs in Tokyo. The data regarding the participant and clinic characteristics and daily practices for individuals with early-stage dementia were collected. The clinical collaborative practice was classified using a latent class analysis; comparisons were made between the identified classes based on 14 items in seven domains of support.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Two collaborative and one stand-alone models were identified. The former varied in the professionals' roles, with one led by PCPs and the other by CMs. We named them PCP-led, CM-led, and stand-alone models, accounting for 46.4%, 32.8%, and 20.6% of the clinics, respectively. The PCP-led clinics were significantly more likely to provide support than the stand-alone ones across five domains: cognitive function, care planning, carers' support, information, and social health. The CM-led model clinics generally fell between those of the other two models.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Different leadership styles exist in the PCP-CM collaborations in care delivery for people with early-stage dementia. This collaboration offers distinct advantages for clinics in addressing their needs.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14049,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Integrated Care\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11160391/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Integrated Care\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5334/ijic.7726\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/4/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Integrated Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5334/ijic.7726","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/4/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本研究探讨了初级保健医生(PCP)和护理经理(CM)之间的合作模式,并评估了每种模式在满足早期痴呆症患者的支持需求方面的潜力:本研究探讨了初级保健医生(PCPs)与护理经理(CMs)之间的合作模式,并评估了每种模式在满足早期痴呆症患者的支持需求方面的潜力:方法:2022 年,对东京的初级保健医生进行了一项横断面调查。方法:2022 年,对东京的初级保健医生进行了一次横断面调查,收集了有关参与者和诊所特征以及针对早期痴呆症患者的日常实践的数据。采用潜类分析法对临床合作实践进行分类;根据七个支持领域的 14 个项目对确定的类别进行比较:结果:确定了两种合作模式和一种独立模式。前者的专业人员角色各不相同,一种由初级保健医生领导,另一种由中医师领导。我们将这三种模式分别命名为初级保健医生主导模式、中医主导模式和独立模式,分别占诊所总数的 46.4%、32.8% 和 20.6%。在认知功能、护理规划、照护者支持、信息和社会健康这五个方面,初级保健医生主导型诊所提供支持的可能性明显高于独立型诊所。由中医师领导的模式诊所一般介于其他两种模式诊所之间:结论:在为早期痴呆症患者提供护理服务的过程中,初级保健医生-中医师合作模式存在不同的领导风格。这种合作为诊所提供了满足其需求的独特优势。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Collaborative Care Models of Primary Care Clinics for People with Early-Stage Dementia: A Cross-Sectional Survey of Primary Care Physicians in Japan.

Objectives: This study explored collaboration models between primary care physicians (PCPs) and care managers (CMs) and assessed each model's potential in meeting the support needs of individuals with early-stage dementia.

Methods: In 2022, a cross-sectional survey was conducted among the PCPs in Tokyo. The data regarding the participant and clinic characteristics and daily practices for individuals with early-stage dementia were collected. The clinical collaborative practice was classified using a latent class analysis; comparisons were made between the identified classes based on 14 items in seven domains of support.

Results: Two collaborative and one stand-alone models were identified. The former varied in the professionals' roles, with one led by PCPs and the other by CMs. We named them PCP-led, CM-led, and stand-alone models, accounting for 46.4%, 32.8%, and 20.6% of the clinics, respectively. The PCP-led clinics were significantly more likely to provide support than the stand-alone ones across five domains: cognitive function, care planning, carers' support, information, and social health. The CM-led model clinics generally fell between those of the other two models.

Conclusion: Different leadership styles exist in the PCP-CM collaborations in care delivery for people with early-stage dementia. This collaboration offers distinct advantages for clinics in addressing their needs.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
International Journal of Integrated Care
International Journal of Integrated Care HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES-
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
8.30%
发文量
887
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Established in 2000, IJIC’s mission is to promote integrated care as a scientific discipline. IJIC’s primary purpose is to examine critically the policy and practice of integrated care and whether and how this has impacted on quality-of-care, user experiences, and cost-effectiveness. The journal regularly publishes conference supplements and special themed editions. To find out more contact Managing Editor, Susan Royer. The Journal is supported by the International Foundation for Integrated Care (IFIC).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信