客户选择食品储藏室的食品选择:低收入食品储藏室使用者会对机会成本的变化做出反应吗?

IF 6.8 1区 经济学 Q1 AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS & POLICY
Himani Vardhan Sharma , Tammy Leonard
{"title":"客户选择食品储藏室的食品选择:低收入食品储藏室使用者会对机会成本的变化做出反应吗?","authors":"Himani Vardhan Sharma ,&nbsp;Tammy Leonard","doi":"10.1016/j.foodpol.2024.102653","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Client choice food pantries allow individuals, many of whom are food insecure, to select a preferred bundle of food. To date, interventions to improve the nutrition of food choices in pantries have not included price incentive programs like those employed in the retail food sector because pantries do not charge for food. However, economic incentives may still play a role in food pantry choices through choice architecture. We examined a natural experiment involving two client-choice regimes that effectively altered the opportunity cost of food selections. Longitudinal individual fixed effects models provide evidence that pantry clients responded to changed opportunity costs by selecting more foods that became relatively less expensive and fewer foods that became relatively more costly. Our study highlights the impact of choice architecture, and in particular relative trade-offs, on food selections in the food pantry context.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":321,"journal":{"name":"Food Policy","volume":"126 ","pages":"Article 102653"},"PeriodicalIF":6.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Food choices at a client choice food pantry: Do low-income pantry users respond to changed opportunity costs?\",\"authors\":\"Himani Vardhan Sharma ,&nbsp;Tammy Leonard\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.foodpol.2024.102653\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Client choice food pantries allow individuals, many of whom are food insecure, to select a preferred bundle of food. To date, interventions to improve the nutrition of food choices in pantries have not included price incentive programs like those employed in the retail food sector because pantries do not charge for food. However, economic incentives may still play a role in food pantry choices through choice architecture. We examined a natural experiment involving two client-choice regimes that effectively altered the opportunity cost of food selections. Longitudinal individual fixed effects models provide evidence that pantry clients responded to changed opportunity costs by selecting more foods that became relatively less expensive and fewer foods that became relatively more costly. Our study highlights the impact of choice architecture, and in particular relative trade-offs, on food selections in the food pantry context.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":321,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Food Policy\",\"volume\":\"126 \",\"pages\":\"Article 102653\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Food Policy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0306919224000642\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS & POLICY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Food Policy","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0306919224000642","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS & POLICY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

客户选择食品储藏室允许个人(其中许多人缺乏食物保障)选择喜欢的食品包。迄今为止,改善食品储藏室食品选择营养的干预措施还没有包括像食品零售业那样的价格激励计划,因为食品储藏室不收取食品费用。然而,经济激励措施仍可通过选择结构在食品储藏室的选择中发挥作用。我们研究了一个自然实验,其中涉及两种客户选择制度,它们有效地改变了食物选择的机会成本。纵向个体固定效应模型提供的证据表明,食品储藏室的客户通过选择更多价格相对较低的食品和更少的价格相对较高的食品来应对机会成本的变化。我们的研究强调了选择结构,尤其是相对权衡,对食品储藏室中食品选择的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Food choices at a client choice food pantry: Do low-income pantry users respond to changed opportunity costs?

Client choice food pantries allow individuals, many of whom are food insecure, to select a preferred bundle of food. To date, interventions to improve the nutrition of food choices in pantries have not included price incentive programs like those employed in the retail food sector because pantries do not charge for food. However, economic incentives may still play a role in food pantry choices through choice architecture. We examined a natural experiment involving two client-choice regimes that effectively altered the opportunity cost of food selections. Longitudinal individual fixed effects models provide evidence that pantry clients responded to changed opportunity costs by selecting more foods that became relatively less expensive and fewer foods that became relatively more costly. Our study highlights the impact of choice architecture, and in particular relative trade-offs, on food selections in the food pantry context.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Food Policy
Food Policy 管理科学-农业经济与政策
CiteScore
11.40
自引率
4.60%
发文量
128
审稿时长
62 days
期刊介绍: Food Policy is a multidisciplinary journal publishing original research and novel evidence on issues in the formulation, implementation, and evaluation of policies for the food sector in developing, transition, and advanced economies. Our main focus is on the economic and social aspect of food policy, and we prioritize empirical studies informing international food policy debates. Provided that articles make a clear and explicit contribution to food policy debates of international interest, we consider papers from any of the social sciences. Papers from other disciplines (e.g., law) will be considered only if they provide a key policy contribution, and are written in a style which is accessible to a social science readership.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信