英国手动轮椅的满意度和改进建议。

IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q2 REHABILITATION
Katy E Griggs
{"title":"英国手动轮椅的满意度和改进建议。","authors":"Katy E Griggs","doi":"10.1080/17483107.2024.2359473","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose of the article: </strong>The aim of this study was to determine user satisfaction with manual wheelchairs in the United Kingdom and to determine areas that could be improved to help drive future design and development.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Manual wheelchair users, aged 18-65 years old living in the United Kingdom, were invited, to complete an online cross-sectional questionnaire. The link to the questionnaire was distributed using a range of methods to charities, organisations and wheelchair user groups <i>via</i> invitation by email and social media. Responses were gathered from 122 respondents and analysed using descriptive statistics, cross-tabulation and content analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Respondents felt comfort (39.3%), weight (35.4%), manoeuvrability (34.3%) and durability (30.7%) were the most important features of a wheelchair. Seventy percent of respondents that were \"not at all satisfied\" with their current wheelchair were fitted by the National Health Service (NHS, <i>X<sup>2</sup></i> = 42.39, <i>p</i> < 0.001). Ninety percent of respondents who were \"not at all satisfied\" with their current wheelchair experienced issues with comfort (<i>X<sup>2</sup></i> = 17.82, <i>p</i> = 0.001). Sixty percent who were \"not satisfied at all\" with their wheelchair had not chosen their wheelchair (<i>X<sup>2</sup></i> = 25.15, <i>p</i> < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Wheelchair satisfaction was largely determined by comfort, location of the users' wheelchair fitting (for example the NHS) and users choosing their own wheelchair. Future wheelchair designs should utilise a user centred and inclusive design approach to cater for a wider range of individual needs and requirements.</p>","PeriodicalId":47806,"journal":{"name":"Disability and Rehabilitation-Assistive Technology","volume":" ","pages":"163-170"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Wheelchair satisfaction and recommended improvements of manual wheelchairs in the UK.\",\"authors\":\"Katy E Griggs\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/17483107.2024.2359473\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose of the article: </strong>The aim of this study was to determine user satisfaction with manual wheelchairs in the United Kingdom and to determine areas that could be improved to help drive future design and development.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Manual wheelchair users, aged 18-65 years old living in the United Kingdom, were invited, to complete an online cross-sectional questionnaire. The link to the questionnaire was distributed using a range of methods to charities, organisations and wheelchair user groups <i>via</i> invitation by email and social media. Responses were gathered from 122 respondents and analysed using descriptive statistics, cross-tabulation and content analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Respondents felt comfort (39.3%), weight (35.4%), manoeuvrability (34.3%) and durability (30.7%) were the most important features of a wheelchair. Seventy percent of respondents that were \\\"not at all satisfied\\\" with their current wheelchair were fitted by the National Health Service (NHS, <i>X<sup>2</sup></i> = 42.39, <i>p</i> < 0.001). Ninety percent of respondents who were \\\"not at all satisfied\\\" with their current wheelchair experienced issues with comfort (<i>X<sup>2</sup></i> = 17.82, <i>p</i> = 0.001). Sixty percent who were \\\"not satisfied at all\\\" with their wheelchair had not chosen their wheelchair (<i>X<sup>2</sup></i> = 25.15, <i>p</i> < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Wheelchair satisfaction was largely determined by comfort, location of the users' wheelchair fitting (for example the NHS) and users choosing their own wheelchair. Future wheelchair designs should utilise a user centred and inclusive design approach to cater for a wider range of individual needs and requirements.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47806,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Disability and Rehabilitation-Assistive Technology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"163-170\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Disability and Rehabilitation-Assistive Technology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/17483107.2024.2359473\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/6/7 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"REHABILITATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Disability and Rehabilitation-Assistive Technology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17483107.2024.2359473","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/6/7 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

文章目的本研究旨在确定英国手动轮椅用户的满意度,并确定可以改进的方面,以帮助推动未来的设计和开发:邀请居住在英国的 18-65 岁手动轮椅用户填写一份在线横截面问卷。通过电子邮件和社交媒体向慈善机构、组织和轮椅使用者团体分发了问卷链接。共收集到 122 位受访者的回复,并采用描述性统计、交叉表法和内容分析法进行了分析:受访者认为舒适度(39.3%)、重量(35.4%)、可操作性(34.3%)和耐用性(30.7%)是轮椅最重要的特征。在对自己目前的轮椅 "完全不满意 "的受访者中,有 70% 是由国家医疗服务机构(NHS,X2 = 42.39,P X2 = 17.82,P = 0.001)为其安装的。对轮椅 "完全不满意 "的人中有 60% 没有选择过轮椅(X2 = 25.15,p 结论:"完全不满意 "的人中有 60% 没有选择过轮椅:轮椅满意度在很大程度上取决于舒适度、用户安装轮椅的地点(例如国家医疗服务体系)以及用户是否选择了自己的轮椅。未来的轮椅设计应采用以用户为中心的包容性设计方法,以满足更广泛的个人需求和要求。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Wheelchair satisfaction and recommended improvements of manual wheelchairs in the UK.

Purpose of the article: The aim of this study was to determine user satisfaction with manual wheelchairs in the United Kingdom and to determine areas that could be improved to help drive future design and development.

Materials and methods: Manual wheelchair users, aged 18-65 years old living in the United Kingdom, were invited, to complete an online cross-sectional questionnaire. The link to the questionnaire was distributed using a range of methods to charities, organisations and wheelchair user groups via invitation by email and social media. Responses were gathered from 122 respondents and analysed using descriptive statistics, cross-tabulation and content analysis.

Results: Respondents felt comfort (39.3%), weight (35.4%), manoeuvrability (34.3%) and durability (30.7%) were the most important features of a wheelchair. Seventy percent of respondents that were "not at all satisfied" with their current wheelchair were fitted by the National Health Service (NHS, X2 = 42.39, p < 0.001). Ninety percent of respondents who were "not at all satisfied" with their current wheelchair experienced issues with comfort (X2 = 17.82, p = 0.001). Sixty percent who were "not satisfied at all" with their wheelchair had not chosen their wheelchair (X2 = 25.15, p < 0.001).

Conclusion: Wheelchair satisfaction was largely determined by comfort, location of the users' wheelchair fitting (for example the NHS) and users choosing their own wheelchair. Future wheelchair designs should utilise a user centred and inclusive design approach to cater for a wider range of individual needs and requirements.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
13.60%
发文量
128
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信