发现错误:重新评估斑纹鼓石 Stellifer punctatissimus (Meek & Hildebrand, 1925) (Teleostei: Sciaenidae)揭示了物种识别错误的趋势,并提出了纬度性二态性的建议

IF 1.6 3区 生物学 Q2 ZOOLOGY
Zoology Pub Date : 2024-06-03 DOI:10.1016/j.zool.2024.126180
Jonas Andrade-Santos , Ricardo S. Rosa , Telton P.A. Ramos
{"title":"发现错误:重新评估斑纹鼓石 Stellifer punctatissimus (Meek & Hildebrand, 1925) (Teleostei: Sciaenidae)揭示了物种识别错误的趋势,并提出了纬度性二态性的建议","authors":"Jonas Andrade-Santos ,&nbsp;Ricardo S. Rosa ,&nbsp;Telton P.A. Ramos","doi":"10.1016/j.zool.2024.126180","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>A major part of the described species is understudied, falling into the Linnean shortfall. This is a major concern for cryptic species, which require integrative approaches to better evaluate their diversity. We conducted morphological analyses using specimens of <em>Stellifer punctatissimus</em>, <em>S</em>. <em>gomezi</em>, and <em>S</em>. <em>menezesi</em> to reassess their taxonomical identity. We evaluated the allometric and sexual components of the morphology of the <em>Stellifer punctatissimus</em> species complex, and tested and discussed species hypotheses. The combined evidence of our work and previous studies agrees with the current morphological hypothesis of three species, as opposed to the two-lineage molecular hypothesis. However, as cryptic species, they overlap in most their traits, especially females and juveniles. Previously unaccounted variation of allometric and sexually dimorphic characters in this species complex revealed a confounding effect that might explain past and current taxonomic errors. Taxonomical practice of using body depth as a diagnostic character had led to juveniles and females being, respectively, described as a different species or wrongfully identified. Hence, taxonomical studies demand better assessment of allometric and sexual dimorphism components. Herein, we present new characters in a key to the Atlantic species of <em>Stellifer</em>, which disclose size and sexual variation unnoticed in previous studies. The contrasting growth patterns among these species could imply distinct habitat use. As a result, it could be suggested that such species are under different threats, which highlights the need of differential management and conservation strategies.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":49330,"journal":{"name":"Zoology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Spotting mistakes: Reappraisal of Spotted Drum Stellifer punctatissimus (Meek & Hildebrand, 1925) (Teleostei: Sciaenidae) reveals species misidentification trends and suggests latitudinal sexual dimorphism\",\"authors\":\"Jonas Andrade-Santos ,&nbsp;Ricardo S. Rosa ,&nbsp;Telton P.A. Ramos\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.zool.2024.126180\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>A major part of the described species is understudied, falling into the Linnean shortfall. This is a major concern for cryptic species, which require integrative approaches to better evaluate their diversity. We conducted morphological analyses using specimens of <em>Stellifer punctatissimus</em>, <em>S</em>. <em>gomezi</em>, and <em>S</em>. <em>menezesi</em> to reassess their taxonomical identity. We evaluated the allometric and sexual components of the morphology of the <em>Stellifer punctatissimus</em> species complex, and tested and discussed species hypotheses. The combined evidence of our work and previous studies agrees with the current morphological hypothesis of three species, as opposed to the two-lineage molecular hypothesis. However, as cryptic species, they overlap in most their traits, especially females and juveniles. Previously unaccounted variation of allometric and sexually dimorphic characters in this species complex revealed a confounding effect that might explain past and current taxonomic errors. Taxonomical practice of using body depth as a diagnostic character had led to juveniles and females being, respectively, described as a different species or wrongfully identified. Hence, taxonomical studies demand better assessment of allometric and sexual dimorphism components. Herein, we present new characters in a key to the Atlantic species of <em>Stellifer</em>, which disclose size and sexual variation unnoticed in previous studies. The contrasting growth patterns among these species could imply distinct habitat use. As a result, it could be suggested that such species are under different threats, which highlights the need of differential management and conservation strategies.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49330,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Zoology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Zoology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"99\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0944200624000394\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"生物学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ZOOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Zoology","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0944200624000394","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ZOOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

大部分已描述的物种都未得到充分研究,属于林奈学派的缺失物种。这对于隐匿物种来说是一个重大问题,它们需要综合方法来更好地评估其多样性。我们利用Stellifer punctatissimus、S. gomezi和S. menezesi的标本进行了形态学分析,以重新评估它们的分类身份。我们评估了Stellifer punctatissimus物种复合体形态学中的异性和有性成分,并测试和讨论了物种假说。综合我们的工作和之前的研究证据,与两系分子假说相比,目前的形态学假说同意三个物种。然而,作为隐性物种,它们的大部分特征都是重叠的,尤其是雌性和幼体。在该物种群中,以前无法计算的异速和性二态特征的变异揭示了一种混杂效应,可能解释了过去和现在的分类错误。分类学上使用体深作为诊断特征的做法导致幼体和雌体分别被描述为不同的物种或被错误地识别。因此,分类学研究需要更好地评估异长和性二态成分。在此,我们提出了大西洋石龙子物种的新特征,这些特征揭示了以往研究中未注意到的体型和性别差异。这些物种之间截然不同的生长模式可能意味着对栖息地的不同利用。因此,可以认为这些物种面临着不同的威胁,这突出表明需要采取不同的管理和保护策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Spotting mistakes: Reappraisal of Spotted Drum Stellifer punctatissimus (Meek & Hildebrand, 1925) (Teleostei: Sciaenidae) reveals species misidentification trends and suggests latitudinal sexual dimorphism

A major part of the described species is understudied, falling into the Linnean shortfall. This is a major concern for cryptic species, which require integrative approaches to better evaluate their diversity. We conducted morphological analyses using specimens of Stellifer punctatissimus, S. gomezi, and S. menezesi to reassess their taxonomical identity. We evaluated the allometric and sexual components of the morphology of the Stellifer punctatissimus species complex, and tested and discussed species hypotheses. The combined evidence of our work and previous studies agrees with the current morphological hypothesis of three species, as opposed to the two-lineage molecular hypothesis. However, as cryptic species, they overlap in most their traits, especially females and juveniles. Previously unaccounted variation of allometric and sexually dimorphic characters in this species complex revealed a confounding effect that might explain past and current taxonomic errors. Taxonomical practice of using body depth as a diagnostic character had led to juveniles and females being, respectively, described as a different species or wrongfully identified. Hence, taxonomical studies demand better assessment of allometric and sexual dimorphism components. Herein, we present new characters in a key to the Atlantic species of Stellifer, which disclose size and sexual variation unnoticed in previous studies. The contrasting growth patterns among these species could imply distinct habitat use. As a result, it could be suggested that such species are under different threats, which highlights the need of differential management and conservation strategies.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Zoology
Zoology 生物-动物学
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
37
审稿时长
70 days
期刊介绍: Zoology is a journal devoted to experimental and comparative animal science. It presents a common forum for all scientists who take an explicitly organism oriented and integrative approach to the study of animal form, function, development and evolution. The journal invites papers that take a comparative or experimental approach to behavior and neurobiology, functional morphology, evolution and development, ecological physiology, and cell biology. Due to the increasing realization that animals exist only within a partnership with symbionts, Zoology encourages submissions of papers focused on the analysis of holobionts or metaorganisms as associations of the macroscopic host in synergistic interdependence with numerous microbial and eukaryotic species. The editors and the editorial board are committed to presenting science at its best. The editorial team is regularly adjusting editorial practice to the ever changing field of animal biology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信