枪伤所致周围神经损伤的手术干预时机:处理方法和文献综述。

Surgical neurology international Pub Date : 2024-05-31 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.25259/SNI_197_2024
Joseph Yunga Tigre, Aiko Puerto, Adham M Khalafallah, S Shelby Burks
{"title":"枪伤所致周围神经损伤的手术干预时机:处理方法和文献综述。","authors":"Joseph Yunga Tigre, Aiko Puerto, Adham M Khalafallah, S Shelby Burks","doi":"10.25259/SNI_197_2024","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Gunshot wounds (GSWs) can result in various peripheral nerve injuries (PNIs), ranging from direct nerve transection to neuropraxia caused by the ballistic shockwave mechanism. PNIs from GSWs can be treated with either early or delayed intervention, with the literature supporting both approaches and sparking a debate between early and delayed intervention for PNIs from GSWs. Here, we present a case that underwent delayed exploration of the right common peroneal nerve after GSW and a literature review comparing early versus delayed intervention for PNIs from GSWs.</p><p><strong>Case description: </strong>A 29-year-old male underwent right common peroneal nerve exploration 2 months after he sustained a GSW to the right lower extremity at the level of the fibular head tracking to the lateral malleolus. Initially, after the injury, he was offered supportive care. On evaluation, 1 month later, he reported a right-sided foot drop and paresthesias in the right lower extremity. A partial-thickness injury of the right peroneal nerve was seen on ultrasound, and a bullet fragment in the distal right lower extremity was revealed on computed tomography. The surgical intervention consisted of the right common peroneal nerve decompression proximally to distally and removal of the bullet fragment. Postoperatively, the patient did well with improvements in his right ankle dorsiflexion and plantar flexion seen at his 1.5-month follow-up visit.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Many factors must be considered when treating PNIs from GSWs. For each case, clinical judgment, injury mechanism, and risk-benefit analysis must be evaluated to determine each patient's optimal treatment strategy.</p>","PeriodicalId":94217,"journal":{"name":"Surgical neurology international","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11152554/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Timing of surgical intervention in peripheral nerve injuries from gunshot wounds: Management and review of the literature.\",\"authors\":\"Joseph Yunga Tigre, Aiko Puerto, Adham M Khalafallah, S Shelby Burks\",\"doi\":\"10.25259/SNI_197_2024\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Gunshot wounds (GSWs) can result in various peripheral nerve injuries (PNIs), ranging from direct nerve transection to neuropraxia caused by the ballistic shockwave mechanism. PNIs from GSWs can be treated with either early or delayed intervention, with the literature supporting both approaches and sparking a debate between early and delayed intervention for PNIs from GSWs. Here, we present a case that underwent delayed exploration of the right common peroneal nerve after GSW and a literature review comparing early versus delayed intervention for PNIs from GSWs.</p><p><strong>Case description: </strong>A 29-year-old male underwent right common peroneal nerve exploration 2 months after he sustained a GSW to the right lower extremity at the level of the fibular head tracking to the lateral malleolus. Initially, after the injury, he was offered supportive care. On evaluation, 1 month later, he reported a right-sided foot drop and paresthesias in the right lower extremity. A partial-thickness injury of the right peroneal nerve was seen on ultrasound, and a bullet fragment in the distal right lower extremity was revealed on computed tomography. The surgical intervention consisted of the right common peroneal nerve decompression proximally to distally and removal of the bullet fragment. Postoperatively, the patient did well with improvements in his right ankle dorsiflexion and plantar flexion seen at his 1.5-month follow-up visit.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Many factors must be considered when treating PNIs from GSWs. For each case, clinical judgment, injury mechanism, and risk-benefit analysis must be evaluated to determine each patient's optimal treatment strategy.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":94217,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Surgical neurology international\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11152554/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Surgical neurology international\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.25259/SNI_197_2024\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Surgical neurology international","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25259/SNI_197_2024","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:枪伤(GSW)可导致各种周围神经损伤(PNI),从直接神经横断到弹道冲击波机制导致的神经瘫痪。枪伤导致的周围神经损伤可通过早期或延迟干预治疗,文献支持这两种方法,并引发了枪伤导致的周围神经损伤早期干预和延迟干预之间的争论。在此,我们介绍一例在腓肠肌损伤后接受延迟探查右腓总神经的病例,并对腓肠肌损伤引起的腓肠神经损伤的早期干预与延迟干预进行文献综述:一名 29 岁的男性在右下肢腓骨头水平至外侧踝骨处发生 GSW,2 个月后接受了右腓总神经探查术。受伤后,他最初接受的是支持性治疗。一个月后进行评估时,他报告说右侧脚部下垂,右下肢麻痹。超声波检查发现右腓肠神经部分厚度损伤,计算机断层扫描显示右下肢远端有子弹碎片。手术治疗包括右腓总神经近端至远端减压和取出子弹碎片。术后,患者表现良好,在1个半月的随访中,他的右踝关节背屈和跖屈均有所改善:结论:在治疗 GSW 引起的 PNI 时,必须考虑许多因素。对于每个病例,都必须进行临床判断、损伤机制和风险效益分析,以确定每位患者的最佳治疗策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Timing of surgical intervention in peripheral nerve injuries from gunshot wounds: Management and review of the literature.

Background: Gunshot wounds (GSWs) can result in various peripheral nerve injuries (PNIs), ranging from direct nerve transection to neuropraxia caused by the ballistic shockwave mechanism. PNIs from GSWs can be treated with either early or delayed intervention, with the literature supporting both approaches and sparking a debate between early and delayed intervention for PNIs from GSWs. Here, we present a case that underwent delayed exploration of the right common peroneal nerve after GSW and a literature review comparing early versus delayed intervention for PNIs from GSWs.

Case description: A 29-year-old male underwent right common peroneal nerve exploration 2 months after he sustained a GSW to the right lower extremity at the level of the fibular head tracking to the lateral malleolus. Initially, after the injury, he was offered supportive care. On evaluation, 1 month later, he reported a right-sided foot drop and paresthesias in the right lower extremity. A partial-thickness injury of the right peroneal nerve was seen on ultrasound, and a bullet fragment in the distal right lower extremity was revealed on computed tomography. The surgical intervention consisted of the right common peroneal nerve decompression proximally to distally and removal of the bullet fragment. Postoperatively, the patient did well with improvements in his right ankle dorsiflexion and plantar flexion seen at his 1.5-month follow-up visit.

Conclusion: Many factors must be considered when treating PNIs from GSWs. For each case, clinical judgment, injury mechanism, and risk-benefit analysis must be evaluated to determine each patient's optimal treatment strategy.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信