利用超声波对腰椎节段进行测量的观察者内部可靠性研究。

Q3 Health Professions
Ralph Kruse, Maruti Ram Gudavalli, Bret White, Geracimo Bracho, Stacey Rider
{"title":"利用超声波对腰椎节段进行测量的观察者内部可靠性研究。","authors":"Ralph Kruse, Maruti Ram Gudavalli, Bret White, Geracimo Bracho, Stacey Rider","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Spinal Manipulative Therapy (SMT) benefits LBP patients, but its mechanism is not well documented. One hypothesis indicates that SMT restores interspinal movements. Ultrasound measurement (UM) of spinous process separation (SPS) assesses the intersegmental movements.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We used the test-retest reliability of UM between the L3, L4, L5, and S1 spinous processes on fifteen asymptomatic volunteers while lying prone on a chiropractic table. The participants then walked around for over 5 minutes, and ultrasound images were reperformed prone. UM identified the tips of the spinous processes and distances between L3-L4, L4-L5, and L5-S1. Reliability was assessed using intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>ICC values of SPS measurements were 0.982 for L3-L4, 0.992 for L4-L5, and 0.997 for L5-S1. Rootmean square difference between the two measures were 0.35mm for L5-S1, 0.36mm for L4-L5, and 0.57mm for L3-L4.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study found UM to be reliable in measuring interspinous distance.</p>","PeriodicalId":38036,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Canadian Chiropractic Association","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11149686/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Intra-observer reliability study of lumbar segmental measurements utilizing ultrasonography.\",\"authors\":\"Ralph Kruse, Maruti Ram Gudavalli, Bret White, Geracimo Bracho, Stacey Rider\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Spinal Manipulative Therapy (SMT) benefits LBP patients, but its mechanism is not well documented. One hypothesis indicates that SMT restores interspinal movements. Ultrasound measurement (UM) of spinous process separation (SPS) assesses the intersegmental movements.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We used the test-retest reliability of UM between the L3, L4, L5, and S1 spinous processes on fifteen asymptomatic volunteers while lying prone on a chiropractic table. The participants then walked around for over 5 minutes, and ultrasound images were reperformed prone. UM identified the tips of the spinous processes and distances between L3-L4, L4-L5, and L5-S1. Reliability was assessed using intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>ICC values of SPS measurements were 0.982 for L3-L4, 0.992 for L4-L5, and 0.997 for L5-S1. Rootmean square difference between the two measures were 0.35mm for L5-S1, 0.36mm for L4-L5, and 0.57mm for L3-L4.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study found UM to be reliable in measuring interspinous distance.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":38036,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of the Canadian Chiropractic Association\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11149686/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of the Canadian Chiropractic Association\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Health Professions\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Canadian Chiropractic Association","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Health Professions","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:脊柱手法治疗(SMT)可使枸杞多糖症患者受益,但其机制尚未得到充分证实。一种假说认为脊柱手法治疗能恢复脊柱间的运动。脊柱棘突分离超声测量(UM)可评估脊柱节间运动:方法:我们对 15 名无症状的志愿者进行了 L3、L4、L5 和 S1 棘突间超声波测量的重复测试。然后,参与者在周围走动 5 分钟以上,再俯卧重新进行超声波成像。UM 确定了棘突的顶端以及 L3-L4、L4-L5 和 L5-S1 之间的距离。使用类内相关系数(ICC)评估可靠性:L3-L4、L4-L5 和 L5-S1 的 SPS 测量 ICC 值分别为 0.982、0.992 和 0.997。两种测量值的均方根差值分别为:L5-S1 0.35mm,L4-L5 0.36mm,L3-L4 0.57mm:本研究发现 UM 在测量棘间距离方面是可靠的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Intra-observer reliability study of lumbar segmental measurements utilizing ultrasonography.

Background: Spinal Manipulative Therapy (SMT) benefits LBP patients, but its mechanism is not well documented. One hypothesis indicates that SMT restores interspinal movements. Ultrasound measurement (UM) of spinous process separation (SPS) assesses the intersegmental movements.

Methods: We used the test-retest reliability of UM between the L3, L4, L5, and S1 spinous processes on fifteen asymptomatic volunteers while lying prone on a chiropractic table. The participants then walked around for over 5 minutes, and ultrasound images were reperformed prone. UM identified the tips of the spinous processes and distances between L3-L4, L4-L5, and L5-S1. Reliability was assessed using intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC).

Results: ICC values of SPS measurements were 0.982 for L3-L4, 0.992 for L4-L5, and 0.997 for L5-S1. Rootmean square difference between the two measures were 0.35mm for L5-S1, 0.36mm for L4-L5, and 0.57mm for L3-L4.

Conclusions: This study found UM to be reliable in measuring interspinous distance.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of the Canadian Chiropractic Association
Journal of the Canadian Chiropractic Association Health Professions-Chiropractics
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
16
期刊介绍: The Journal of the Canadian Chiropractic Association (JCCA) publishes research papers, commentaries and editorials relevant to the practice of chiropractic.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信