就 "体重调整后的腰围作为成年人脂肪、肌肉和骨骼健康的综合指数 "发表评论。

IF 9.4 1区 医学 Q1 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY
Xiao Li
{"title":"就 \"体重调整后的腰围作为成年人脂肪、肌肉和骨骼健康的综合指数 \"发表评论。","authors":"Xiao Li","doi":"10.1002/jcsm.13505","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>I read with interest the paper entitled ‘Weight-adjusted Waist as an Integrated Index for Fat, Muscle and Bone Health in Adults’ by Kim et al.,<span><sup>1</sup></span> which utilizes the KNHANES (Korean National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey) to innovatively investigate the association between a novel index for assessing obesity, the weight-adjusted waist circumference index (WWI), and unhealthy body composition in the Korean population. WWI was found to be negatively correlated with bone and muscle mass but positively correlated with fat mass, and significantly higher outcomes of unhealthy body composition (high-fat mass, low muscle mass and low bone mass) were found in higher quartiles of WWI than in lower quartiles (18.08 [95% confidence interval, CI, 4.32–75.61] for men and 6.36 [95% CI, 3.65–11.07] for women). Tissue dysfunction in muscle, bone and fat is closely related to human health and may be a risk factor for disease and death. Compared with traditional anthropometric measures for assessing obesity, WWI can better differentiate between fat and muscle mass and may help us better identify people at risk for unhealthy body composition. All in all, I think this is a very interesting study. But I also have some questions about the study.</p><p>Firstly, in the selection of covariates, the authors adjusted for important covariates such as age, smoking status and hypertension status in this study, which is excellent, but I noticed that the authors also adjusted for dyslipidaemia (including total cholesterol, triglycerides, LDL cholesterol and HDL cholesterol) during the course of the study, so may I ask the authors if they took into account the multiple covariances?</p><p>Secondly, can the authors complement the limitations of the remaining obesity indices in their study and thus explore whether WWI has a stronger association with unhealthy body composition than when using body mass index (BMI) or waist circumference (WC)? This is because the authors also mentioned in their study that WWI has unique advantages over the traditional assessment of obesity indices. And also, the authors plotted the receiver operating characteristic curve to analyse the predictive ability of WWI, so is it possible to consider comparing WWI with other obesity indices (e.g., WC, BMI, waist-to-height ratio, a body shape index [ABSI], etc.) to observe whether it is a better predictor of unhealthy body composition?</p><p>In conclusion, my suggestion is to make an already excellent study even better, and I also hope that the authors can focus on my questions so that readers will get more accurate conclusions from the study.</p><p>The author declares that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.</p><p>The author declares that no financial support was received for the research, authorship and/or publication of this article.</p>","PeriodicalId":48911,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cachexia Sarcopenia and Muscle","volume":"15 4","pages":"1624"},"PeriodicalIF":9.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11294023/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comment on ‘Weight-adjusted waist as an integrated index for fat, muscle and bone health in adults’\",\"authors\":\"Xiao Li\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/jcsm.13505\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>I read with interest the paper entitled ‘Weight-adjusted Waist as an Integrated Index for Fat, Muscle and Bone Health in Adults’ by Kim et al.,<span><sup>1</sup></span> which utilizes the KNHANES (Korean National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey) to innovatively investigate the association between a novel index for assessing obesity, the weight-adjusted waist circumference index (WWI), and unhealthy body composition in the Korean population. WWI was found to be negatively correlated with bone and muscle mass but positively correlated with fat mass, and significantly higher outcomes of unhealthy body composition (high-fat mass, low muscle mass and low bone mass) were found in higher quartiles of WWI than in lower quartiles (18.08 [95% confidence interval, CI, 4.32–75.61] for men and 6.36 [95% CI, 3.65–11.07] for women). Tissue dysfunction in muscle, bone and fat is closely related to human health and may be a risk factor for disease and death. Compared with traditional anthropometric measures for assessing obesity, WWI can better differentiate between fat and muscle mass and may help us better identify people at risk for unhealthy body composition. All in all, I think this is a very interesting study. But I also have some questions about the study.</p><p>Firstly, in the selection of covariates, the authors adjusted for important covariates such as age, smoking status and hypertension status in this study, which is excellent, but I noticed that the authors also adjusted for dyslipidaemia (including total cholesterol, triglycerides, LDL cholesterol and HDL cholesterol) during the course of the study, so may I ask the authors if they took into account the multiple covariances?</p><p>Secondly, can the authors complement the limitations of the remaining obesity indices in their study and thus explore whether WWI has a stronger association with unhealthy body composition than when using body mass index (BMI) or waist circumference (WC)? This is because the authors also mentioned in their study that WWI has unique advantages over the traditional assessment of obesity indices. And also, the authors plotted the receiver operating characteristic curve to analyse the predictive ability of WWI, so is it possible to consider comparing WWI with other obesity indices (e.g., WC, BMI, waist-to-height ratio, a body shape index [ABSI], etc.) to observe whether it is a better predictor of unhealthy body composition?</p><p>In conclusion, my suggestion is to make an already excellent study even better, and I also hope that the authors can focus on my questions so that readers will get more accurate conclusions from the study.</p><p>The author declares that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.</p><p>The author declares that no financial support was received for the research, authorship and/or publication of this article.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48911,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Cachexia Sarcopenia and Muscle\",\"volume\":\"15 4\",\"pages\":\"1624\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":9.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11294023/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Cachexia Sarcopenia and Muscle\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jcsm.13505\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Cachexia Sarcopenia and Muscle","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jcsm.13505","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

我饶有兴趣地阅读了 Kim 等人撰写的题为 "体重调整后腰围作为成人脂肪、肌肉和骨骼健康的综合指数 "的论文1,该论文利用韩国国民健康与营养调查(KNHANES)创新性地研究了韩国人口中用于评估肥胖的新指数--体重调整后腰围指数(WWI)--与不健康身体组成之间的关联。结果发现,WWI 与骨骼和肌肉质量呈负相关,但与脂肪质量呈正相关,WWI 四分位数越高,不健康身体成分(高脂肪质量、低肌肉质量和低骨骼质量)的结果明显高于四分位数越低的结果(男性为 18.08 [95% 置信区间,CI,4.32-75.61],女性为 6.36 [95% CI,3.65-11.07])。肌肉、骨骼和脂肪组织功能障碍与人体健康密切相关,可能是导致疾病和死亡的风险因素。与评估肥胖的传统人体测量方法相比,WWI 能更好地区分脂肪和肌肉质量,并能帮助我们更好地识别身体成分不健康的高危人群。总而言之,我认为这是一项非常有趣的研究。首先,在协变量的选择上,作者在这项研究中对年龄、吸烟状况和高血压状况等重要协变量进行了调整,这是非常好的,但我注意到作者在研究过程中还对血脂异常(包括总胆固醇、甘油三酯、低密度脂蛋白胆固醇和高密度脂蛋白胆固醇)进行了调整,请问作者是否考虑了多重协变量?其次,作者能否在研究中补充其余肥胖指数的局限性,从而探讨与使用体重指数(BMI)或腰围(WC)相比,WWI 是否与不健康的身体组成有更强的关联?这是因为作者在研究中还提到,与传统的肥胖指数评估相比,WWI 具有独特的优势。此外,作者还绘制了接收者操作特征曲线来分析 WWI 的预测能力,那么是否可以考虑将 WWI 与其他肥胖指数(如:腰围、体重指数、腰围-体重比)进行比较?总之,我的建议是让这项已经非常出色的研究更上一层楼,也希望作者能关注我的问题,让读者从研究中得到更准确的结论。作者声明,本研究的开展不存在任何可被视为潜在利益冲突的商业或经济关系。作者声明,本文的研究、撰写和/或发表未获得任何经济支持。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comment on ‘Weight-adjusted waist as an integrated index for fat, muscle and bone health in adults’

I read with interest the paper entitled ‘Weight-adjusted Waist as an Integrated Index for Fat, Muscle and Bone Health in Adults’ by Kim et al.,1 which utilizes the KNHANES (Korean National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey) to innovatively investigate the association between a novel index for assessing obesity, the weight-adjusted waist circumference index (WWI), and unhealthy body composition in the Korean population. WWI was found to be negatively correlated with bone and muscle mass but positively correlated with fat mass, and significantly higher outcomes of unhealthy body composition (high-fat mass, low muscle mass and low bone mass) were found in higher quartiles of WWI than in lower quartiles (18.08 [95% confidence interval, CI, 4.32–75.61] for men and 6.36 [95% CI, 3.65–11.07] for women). Tissue dysfunction in muscle, bone and fat is closely related to human health and may be a risk factor for disease and death. Compared with traditional anthropometric measures for assessing obesity, WWI can better differentiate between fat and muscle mass and may help us better identify people at risk for unhealthy body composition. All in all, I think this is a very interesting study. But I also have some questions about the study.

Firstly, in the selection of covariates, the authors adjusted for important covariates such as age, smoking status and hypertension status in this study, which is excellent, but I noticed that the authors also adjusted for dyslipidaemia (including total cholesterol, triglycerides, LDL cholesterol and HDL cholesterol) during the course of the study, so may I ask the authors if they took into account the multiple covariances?

Secondly, can the authors complement the limitations of the remaining obesity indices in their study and thus explore whether WWI has a stronger association with unhealthy body composition than when using body mass index (BMI) or waist circumference (WC)? This is because the authors also mentioned in their study that WWI has unique advantages over the traditional assessment of obesity indices. And also, the authors plotted the receiver operating characteristic curve to analyse the predictive ability of WWI, so is it possible to consider comparing WWI with other obesity indices (e.g., WC, BMI, waist-to-height ratio, a body shape index [ABSI], etc.) to observe whether it is a better predictor of unhealthy body composition?

In conclusion, my suggestion is to make an already excellent study even better, and I also hope that the authors can focus on my questions so that readers will get more accurate conclusions from the study.

The author declares that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

The author declares that no financial support was received for the research, authorship and/or publication of this article.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Cachexia Sarcopenia and Muscle
Journal of Cachexia Sarcopenia and Muscle MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
CiteScore
13.30
自引率
12.40%
发文量
234
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Cachexia, Sarcopenia and Muscle is a peer-reviewed international journal dedicated to publishing materials related to cachexia and sarcopenia, as well as body composition and its physiological and pathophysiological changes across the lifespan and in response to various illnesses from all fields of life sciences. The journal aims to provide a reliable resource for professionals interested in related research or involved in the clinical care of affected patients, such as those suffering from AIDS, cancer, chronic heart failure, chronic lung disease, liver cirrhosis, chronic kidney failure, rheumatoid arthritis, or sepsis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信