重新审视罗林和卡塞塞对东京法庭的评价

IF 1.8 3区 社会学 Q2 INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS
Kirsten Sellars
{"title":"重新审视罗林和卡塞塞对东京法庭的评价","authors":"Kirsten Sellars","doi":"10.1093/ejil/chae026","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In late 1977, Antonio Cassese interviewed Bernard Röling about his experiences as a judge at the International Military Tribunal for the Far East, and his career after that. The resulting book, The Tokyo Trial and Beyond: Reflections of a Peacemonger, was published in 1993. It not only offered an insider’s account of the politics and personalities that shaped the Tokyo tribunal but also addressed associated issues – strategies for disarmament, the definition of aggression, the limits of self-determination – that would exercise international actors over the ensuing decades. In the process, it revealed much about the perspectives and occasional foibles of two innovative and outward-looking jurists whose work was nonetheless rooted in, and sometimes constrained by, European legal approaches to peace and justice.","PeriodicalId":47727,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of International Law","volume":"37 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Revisiting Röling and Cassese’s Appraisal of the Tokyo Tribunal\",\"authors\":\"Kirsten Sellars\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/ejil/chae026\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In late 1977, Antonio Cassese interviewed Bernard Röling about his experiences as a judge at the International Military Tribunal for the Far East, and his career after that. The resulting book, The Tokyo Trial and Beyond: Reflections of a Peacemonger, was published in 1993. It not only offered an insider’s account of the politics and personalities that shaped the Tokyo tribunal but also addressed associated issues – strategies for disarmament, the definition of aggression, the limits of self-determination – that would exercise international actors over the ensuing decades. In the process, it revealed much about the perspectives and occasional foibles of two innovative and outward-looking jurists whose work was nonetheless rooted in, and sometimes constrained by, European legal approaches to peace and justice.\",\"PeriodicalId\":47727,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Journal of International Law\",\"volume\":\"37 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Journal of International Law\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/ejil/chae026\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of International Law","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ejil/chae026","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

1977 年底,安东尼奥-卡塞塞采访了伯纳德-罗林,了解他在远东国际军事法庭担任法官的经历以及之后的职业生涯。这本书名为《东京审判及其后》:一个和平缔造者的思考》一书于 1993 年出版。该书不仅以内部人士的视角讲述了影响东京法庭的政治和人物,还探讨了相关问题--裁军战略、侵略的定义、自决的限度--这些问题在随后的几十年里一直困扰着国际行动者。在这一过程中,该书揭示了两位创新和外向型法学家的许多观点和偶尔的缺点,他们的工作植根于欧洲对和平与正义的法律方法,有时还受到欧洲法律方法的制约。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Revisiting Röling and Cassese’s Appraisal of the Tokyo Tribunal
In late 1977, Antonio Cassese interviewed Bernard Röling about his experiences as a judge at the International Military Tribunal for the Far East, and his career after that. The resulting book, The Tokyo Trial and Beyond: Reflections of a Peacemonger, was published in 1993. It not only offered an insider’s account of the politics and personalities that shaped the Tokyo tribunal but also addressed associated issues – strategies for disarmament, the definition of aggression, the limits of self-determination – that would exercise international actors over the ensuing decades. In the process, it revealed much about the perspectives and occasional foibles of two innovative and outward-looking jurists whose work was nonetheless rooted in, and sometimes constrained by, European legal approaches to peace and justice.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
8.30%
发文量
70
期刊介绍: The European Journal of International Law is firmly established as one of the world"s leading journals in its field. With its distinctive combination of theoretical and practical approaches to the issues of international law, the journal offers readers a unique opportunity to stay in touch with the latest developments in this rapidly evolving area. Each issue of the EJIL provides a forum for the exploration of the conceptual and theoretical dimensions of international law as well as for up-to-date analysis of topical issues. Additionally, it is the only journal to provide systematic coverage of the relationship between international law and the law of the European Union and its Member States.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信