Mohammad I Hirzallah, Piergiorgio Lochner, Muhammad Ubaid Hafeez, Andrew G Lee, Christos Krogias, Deepa Dongarwar, Nicholas D Hartman, Michael Ertl, Chiara Robba, Branko Malojcic, Jurgita Valaikiene, Aarti Sarwal, Ryan Hakimi, Felix Schlachetzki
{"title":"视神经鞘直径护理点超声成像质量标准检查表：视神经鞘直径成像和测量国际共识声明》。","authors":"Mohammad I Hirzallah, Piergiorgio Lochner, Muhammad Ubaid Hafeez, Andrew G Lee, Christos Krogias, Deepa Dongarwar, Nicholas D Hartman, Michael Ertl, Chiara Robba, Branko Malojcic, Jurgita Valaikiene, Aarti Sarwal, Ryan Hakimi, Felix Schlachetzki","doi":"10.1097/CCM.0000000000006345","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To standardize optic nerve sheath diameter (ONSD) point-of-care ultrasonography (POCUS) and improve its research and clinical utility by developing the ONSD POCUS Quality Criteria Checklist (ONSD POCUS QCC).</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Three rounds of modified Delphi consensus process and three rounds of asynchronous discussions.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Online surveys and anonymous asynchronous discussion.</p><p><strong>Subjects: </strong>Expert panelists were identified according to their expertise in ONSD research, publication records, education, and clinical use. A total of 52 panelists participated in the Delphi process.</p><p><strong>Interventions: </strong>None.</p><p><strong>Measurements and main results: </strong>Three Delphi rounds and three asynchronous discussion rounds generated consensus on quality criteria (QC). This started with 29 QC in addition to other QC proposed by expert panelists. The QC items were categorized into probe selection, safety, body position, imaging, measurement, and research considerations. At the conclusion of the study, 28 QC reached consensus to include in the final ONSD POCUS QCC. These QC were then reorganized, edited, and consolidated into 23 QC that were reviewed and approved by the panelists.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>ONSD POCUS QCC standardizes ONSD ultrasound imaging and measurement based on international consensus. This can establish ONSD ultrasound in clinical research and improve its utility in clinical practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":10765,"journal":{"name":"Critical Care Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"1543-1556"},"PeriodicalIF":7.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Optic Nerve Sheath Diameter Point-of-Care Ultrasonography Quality Criteria Checklist: An International Consensus Statement on Optic Nerve Sheath Diameter Imaging and Measurement.\",\"authors\":\"Mohammad I Hirzallah, Piergiorgio Lochner, Muhammad Ubaid Hafeez, Andrew G Lee, Christos Krogias, Deepa Dongarwar, Nicholas D Hartman, Michael Ertl, Chiara Robba, Branko Malojcic, Jurgita Valaikiene, Aarti Sarwal, Ryan Hakimi, Felix Schlachetzki\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/CCM.0000000000006345\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To standardize optic nerve sheath diameter (ONSD) point-of-care ultrasonography (POCUS) and improve its research and clinical utility by developing the ONSD POCUS Quality Criteria Checklist (ONSD POCUS QCC).</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Three rounds of modified Delphi consensus process and three rounds of asynchronous discussions.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Online surveys and anonymous asynchronous discussion.</p><p><strong>Subjects: </strong>Expert panelists were identified according to their expertise in ONSD research, publication records, education, and clinical use. A total of 52 panelists participated in the Delphi process.</p><p><strong>Interventions: </strong>None.</p><p><strong>Measurements and main results: </strong>Three Delphi rounds and three asynchronous discussion rounds generated consensus on quality criteria (QC). This started with 29 QC in addition to other QC proposed by expert panelists. The QC items were categorized into probe selection, safety, body position, imaging, measurement, and research considerations. At the conclusion of the study, 28 QC reached consensus to include in the final ONSD POCUS QCC. These QC were then reorganized, edited, and consolidated into 23 QC that were reviewed and approved by the panelists.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>ONSD POCUS QCC standardizes ONSD ultrasound imaging and measurement based on international consensus. This can establish ONSD ultrasound in clinical research and improve its utility in clinical practice.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10765,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Critical Care Medicine\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1543-1556\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Critical Care Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/CCM.0000000000006345\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/6/5 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Critical Care Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/CCM.0000000000006345","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/6/5 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
Optic Nerve Sheath Diameter Point-of-Care Ultrasonography Quality Criteria Checklist: An International Consensus Statement on Optic Nerve Sheath Diameter Imaging and Measurement.
Objectives: To standardize optic nerve sheath diameter (ONSD) point-of-care ultrasonography (POCUS) and improve its research and clinical utility by developing the ONSD POCUS Quality Criteria Checklist (ONSD POCUS QCC).
Design: Three rounds of modified Delphi consensus process and three rounds of asynchronous discussions.
Setting: Online surveys and anonymous asynchronous discussion.
Subjects: Expert panelists were identified according to their expertise in ONSD research, publication records, education, and clinical use. A total of 52 panelists participated in the Delphi process.
Interventions: None.
Measurements and main results: Three Delphi rounds and three asynchronous discussion rounds generated consensus on quality criteria (QC). This started with 29 QC in addition to other QC proposed by expert panelists. The QC items were categorized into probe selection, safety, body position, imaging, measurement, and research considerations. At the conclusion of the study, 28 QC reached consensus to include in the final ONSD POCUS QCC. These QC were then reorganized, edited, and consolidated into 23 QC that were reviewed and approved by the panelists.
Conclusions: ONSD POCUS QCC standardizes ONSD ultrasound imaging and measurement based on international consensus. This can establish ONSD ultrasound in clinical research and improve its utility in clinical practice.
期刊介绍：
Critical Care Medicine is the premier peer-reviewed, scientific publication in critical care medicine. Directed to those specialists who treat patients in the ICU and CCU, including chest physicians, surgeons, pediatricians, pharmacists/pharmacologists, anesthesiologists, critical care nurses, and other healthcare professionals, Critical Care Medicine covers all aspects of acute and emergency care for the critically ill or injured patient.
Each issue presents critical care practitioners with clinical breakthroughs that lead to better patient care, the latest news on promising research, and advances in equipment and techniques.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
