在两个低生育率国家,宗教妇女从非伴侣亲属那里获得更多异母支持

IF 3 1区 心理学 Q1 BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES
Laure Spake , Susan B. Schaffnit , Abigail E. Page , Anushé Hassan , Robert Lynch , Joseph Watts , Richard Sosis , Rebecca Sear , Mary K. Shenk , John H. Shaver
{"title":"在两个低生育率国家,宗教妇女从非伴侣亲属那里获得更多异母支持","authors":"Laure Spake ,&nbsp;Susan B. Schaffnit ,&nbsp;Abigail E. Page ,&nbsp;Anushé Hassan ,&nbsp;Robert Lynch ,&nbsp;Joseph Watts ,&nbsp;Richard Sosis ,&nbsp;Rebecca Sear ,&nbsp;Mary K. Shenk ,&nbsp;John H. Shaver","doi":"10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2024.04.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>In low fertility settings, religious people tend to have larger families than non-religious people. One way religious individuals may achieve larger relative family sizes is through support from their families. In this paper, we investigate the relationships between religiosity, kin contact, allomaternal investment from relatives, and fertility in two high income low fertility settings: the United Kingdom and the United States. Data for this pre-registered research come from an online survey of 609 women living in the US and 919 women living in the UK, recruited through Prolific, who answered questions about their religious practices, childbirth histories, social networks, and allomaternal networks. We find that, compared with less religious peers, more religious women: 1) have more geographically diffuse kin networks (particularly in the UK) but have social networks that are equally kin-dense; 2) receive more allomaternal support from kin beyond their partner, particularly help with household tasks, though the countries differ in the exhibited relationship between religiosity and partner support; and 3) have higher fertility in both countries. We do not find strong evidence for a mediating role of allomaternal support on the relationship between religiosity and fertility. Our study highlights important variation in the relationship between religion and fertility across two high income low fertility countries and raises new questions about the role that religion plays in allomaternal support networks in these settings.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":55159,"journal":{"name":"Evolution and Human Behavior","volume":"45 3","pages":"Pages 268-280"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Religious women receive more allomaternal support from non-partner kin in two low-fertility countries\",\"authors\":\"Laure Spake ,&nbsp;Susan B. Schaffnit ,&nbsp;Abigail E. Page ,&nbsp;Anushé Hassan ,&nbsp;Robert Lynch ,&nbsp;Joseph Watts ,&nbsp;Richard Sosis ,&nbsp;Rebecca Sear ,&nbsp;Mary K. Shenk ,&nbsp;John H. Shaver\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2024.04.001\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>In low fertility settings, religious people tend to have larger families than non-religious people. One way religious individuals may achieve larger relative family sizes is through support from their families. In this paper, we investigate the relationships between religiosity, kin contact, allomaternal investment from relatives, and fertility in two high income low fertility settings: the United Kingdom and the United States. Data for this pre-registered research come from an online survey of 609 women living in the US and 919 women living in the UK, recruited through Prolific, who answered questions about their religious practices, childbirth histories, social networks, and allomaternal networks. We find that, compared with less religious peers, more religious women: 1) have more geographically diffuse kin networks (particularly in the UK) but have social networks that are equally kin-dense; 2) receive more allomaternal support from kin beyond their partner, particularly help with household tasks, though the countries differ in the exhibited relationship between religiosity and partner support; and 3) have higher fertility in both countries. We do not find strong evidence for a mediating role of allomaternal support on the relationship between religiosity and fertility. Our study highlights important variation in the relationship between religion and fertility across two high income low fertility countries and raises new questions about the role that religion plays in allomaternal support networks in these settings.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55159,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Evolution and Human Behavior\",\"volume\":\"45 3\",\"pages\":\"Pages 268-280\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Evolution and Human Behavior\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1090513824000369\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Evolution and Human Behavior","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1090513824000369","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在低生育率环境中,信教者的家庭规模往往大于非信教者。有宗教信仰的人实现相对较大家庭规模的一种方式是通过来自家庭的支持。在本文中,我们研究了在英国和美国这两个高收入低生育率环境中,宗教信仰、亲属联系、亲属的异母投资与生育率之间的关系。这项预先登记的研究数据来自一项在线调查,调查对象是通过 Prolific 招募的 609 名美国妇女和 919 名英国妇女,她们回答了有关宗教习俗、生育史、社会网络和异母网络的问题。我们发现,与宗教信仰较少的妇女相比,宗教信仰较多的妇女:1)在地理上拥有更分散的亲属网络(尤其是在英国),但拥有同样密集的亲属社会网络;2)从伴侣以外的亲属那里获得更多的异母支持,尤其是在家务方面的帮助,尽管各国在宗教信仰与伴侣支持之间表现出的关系有所不同;3)在这两个国家,生育率都较高。我们没有发现强有力的证据表明异母支持对宗教信仰和生育率之间的关系起到中介作用。我们的研究凸显了两个高收入低生育率国家在宗教与生育率之间关系的重要差异,并提出了关于宗教在这些环境中的异母支持网络中所扮演角色的新问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Religious women receive more allomaternal support from non-partner kin in two low-fertility countries

In low fertility settings, religious people tend to have larger families than non-religious people. One way religious individuals may achieve larger relative family sizes is through support from their families. In this paper, we investigate the relationships between religiosity, kin contact, allomaternal investment from relatives, and fertility in two high income low fertility settings: the United Kingdom and the United States. Data for this pre-registered research come from an online survey of 609 women living in the US and 919 women living in the UK, recruited through Prolific, who answered questions about their religious practices, childbirth histories, social networks, and allomaternal networks. We find that, compared with less religious peers, more religious women: 1) have more geographically diffuse kin networks (particularly in the UK) but have social networks that are equally kin-dense; 2) receive more allomaternal support from kin beyond their partner, particularly help with household tasks, though the countries differ in the exhibited relationship between religiosity and partner support; and 3) have higher fertility in both countries. We do not find strong evidence for a mediating role of allomaternal support on the relationship between religiosity and fertility. Our study highlights important variation in the relationship between religion and fertility across two high income low fertility countries and raises new questions about the role that religion plays in allomaternal support networks in these settings.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Evolution and Human Behavior
Evolution and Human Behavior 生物-行为科学
CiteScore
8.30
自引率
9.80%
发文量
62
审稿时长
82 days
期刊介绍: Evolution and Human Behavior is an interdisciplinary journal, presenting research reports and theory in which evolutionary perspectives are brought to bear on the study of human behavior. It is primarily a scientific journal, but submissions from scholars in the humanities are also encouraged. Papers reporting on theoretical and empirical work on other species will be welcome if their relevance to the human animal is apparent.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信