综合写作任务的结构表征和预测有效性:对 Duolingo 英语测试写作部分的研究

IF 4.2 1区 文学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Qin Xie
{"title":"综合写作任务的结构表征和预测有效性:对 Duolingo 英语测试写作部分的研究","authors":"Qin Xie","doi":"10.1016/j.asw.2024.100846","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This study examined whether two integrated reading-to-write tasks could broaden the construct representation of the writing component of <em>Duolingo English Test</em> (DET). It also verified whether they could enhance DET’s predictive power of English academic writing in universities. The tasks were (1) writing a summary based on two source texts and (2) writing a reading-to-write essay based on five texts. Both were given to a sample (N = 204) of undergraduates from Hong Kong. Each participant also submitted an academic assignment written for the assessment of a disciplinary course. Three professional raters double-marked all writing samples against detailed analytical rubrics. Raw scores were first processed using Multi-Faceted Rasch Measurement to estimate inter- and intra-rater consistency and generate adjusted (fair) measures. Based on these measures, descriptive analyses, sequential multiple regression, and Structural Equation Modeling were conducted (in that order). The analyses verified the writing tasks’ underlying component constructs and assessed their relative contributions to the overall integrated writing scores. Both tasks were found to contribute to DET’s construct representation and add moderate predictive power to the domain performance. The findings, along with their practical implications, are discussed, especially regarding the complex relations between construct representation and predictive validity.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":46865,"journal":{"name":"Assessing Writing","volume":"61 ","pages":"Article 100846"},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1075293524000394/pdfft?md5=1959b9ed8a9acc732d6a5985fba62520&pid=1-s2.0-S1075293524000394-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Construct representation and predictive validity of integrated writing tasks: A study on the writing component of the Duolingo English Test\",\"authors\":\"Qin Xie\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.asw.2024.100846\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>This study examined whether two integrated reading-to-write tasks could broaden the construct representation of the writing component of <em>Duolingo English Test</em> (DET). It also verified whether they could enhance DET’s predictive power of English academic writing in universities. The tasks were (1) writing a summary based on two source texts and (2) writing a reading-to-write essay based on five texts. Both were given to a sample (N = 204) of undergraduates from Hong Kong. Each participant also submitted an academic assignment written for the assessment of a disciplinary course. Three professional raters double-marked all writing samples against detailed analytical rubrics. Raw scores were first processed using Multi-Faceted Rasch Measurement to estimate inter- and intra-rater consistency and generate adjusted (fair) measures. Based on these measures, descriptive analyses, sequential multiple regression, and Structural Equation Modeling were conducted (in that order). The analyses verified the writing tasks’ underlying component constructs and assessed their relative contributions to the overall integrated writing scores. Both tasks were found to contribute to DET’s construct representation and add moderate predictive power to the domain performance. The findings, along with their practical implications, are discussed, especially regarding the complex relations between construct representation and predictive validity.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":46865,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Assessing Writing\",\"volume\":\"61 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100846\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1075293524000394/pdfft?md5=1959b9ed8a9acc732d6a5985fba62520&pid=1-s2.0-S1075293524000394-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Assessing Writing\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"98\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1075293524000394\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"文学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Assessing Writing","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1075293524000394","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究探讨了两个 "从阅读到写作 "的综合任务是否能够拓宽Duolingo英语测试(DET)写作部分的建构表征。本研究还验证了这两项任务能否增强 DET 对大学英语学术写作的预测能力。这两项任务分别是:(1)根据两篇原文撰写摘要;(2)根据五篇原文撰写 "从阅读到写作 "的文章。这两项任务都是针对香港的本科生样本(N = 204)进行的。每位参与者还提交了一份为学科课程评估而撰写的学术作业。三位专业评分员根据详细的分析评分标准对所有写作样本进行双重评分。原始分数首先使用多方面拉施测量法(Multi-Faceted Rasch Measurement)进行处理,以估计评分者之间和评分者内部的一致性,并生成调整后的(公平的)测量结果。在这些测量结果的基础上,依次进行了描述性分析、连续多元回归和结构方程建模。这些分析验证了写作任务的基本组成结构,并评估了它们对综合写作总分的相对贡献。结果发现,这两项任务都有助于 DET 的建构表征,并为领域成绩增加了适度的预测力。本文讨论了这些研究结果及其实际意义,特别是关于建构表征与预测效度之间的复杂关系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Construct representation and predictive validity of integrated writing tasks: A study on the writing component of the Duolingo English Test

This study examined whether two integrated reading-to-write tasks could broaden the construct representation of the writing component of Duolingo English Test (DET). It also verified whether they could enhance DET’s predictive power of English academic writing in universities. The tasks were (1) writing a summary based on two source texts and (2) writing a reading-to-write essay based on five texts. Both were given to a sample (N = 204) of undergraduates from Hong Kong. Each participant also submitted an academic assignment written for the assessment of a disciplinary course. Three professional raters double-marked all writing samples against detailed analytical rubrics. Raw scores were first processed using Multi-Faceted Rasch Measurement to estimate inter- and intra-rater consistency and generate adjusted (fair) measures. Based on these measures, descriptive analyses, sequential multiple regression, and Structural Equation Modeling were conducted (in that order). The analyses verified the writing tasks’ underlying component constructs and assessed their relative contributions to the overall integrated writing scores. Both tasks were found to contribute to DET’s construct representation and add moderate predictive power to the domain performance. The findings, along with their practical implications, are discussed, especially regarding the complex relations between construct representation and predictive validity.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Assessing Writing
Assessing Writing Multiple-
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
17.90%
发文量
67
期刊介绍: Assessing Writing is a refereed international journal providing a forum for ideas, research and practice on the assessment of written language. Assessing Writing publishes articles, book reviews, conference reports, and academic exchanges concerning writing assessments of all kinds, including traditional (direct and standardised forms of) testing of writing, alternative performance assessments (such as portfolios), workplace sampling and classroom assessment. The journal focuses on all stages of the writing assessment process, including needs evaluation, assessment creation, implementation, and validation, and test development.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信