Sophie Melicine, Laure Maucorps, Valérie Eschwège, Julie Carré, Dominique Helley, Isabelle Gouin-Thibault, Nicolas Gendron, Fabienne Nédélec-Gac, Laetitia Mauge
{"title":"[口服抗 Xa 抗凝剂在监测非分数肝素治疗过程中的干扰:现实与未来的态度]。","authors":"Sophie Melicine, Laure Maucorps, Valérie Eschwège, Julie Carré, Dominique Helley, Isabelle Gouin-Thibault, Nicolas Gendron, Fabienne Nédélec-Gac, Laetitia Mauge","doi":"10.1684/abc.2024.1873","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Contrary to direct oral anticoagulants (DOAC), unfractionated heparin (UFH) requires daily monitoring when administered at therapeutic dose. At present, UFH monitoring is preferably carried out by measuring plasma anti-Xa activity, however, in patients previously treated with an anti-Xa DOAC and switched to UFH, there is a high risk of DOAC interfering with the measurement of UFH anti-Xa activity. Residual anti-Xa DOAC in the sample can lead to an overestimation of the anticoagulant activity attributed to heparin and thus to incorrect anticoagulation. This risk of interference should not be overlooked because interference may occur even at concentration of DOAC below the hemostatic safety threshold and can last several days. To overcome this issue, several alternatives are being studied. This note provides an update on anti-Xa DOAC interference and different strategies available in current practice. It also underlines the importance of communication between biologists and clinicians on anticoagulant treatments received by patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":93870,"journal":{"name":"Annales de biologie clinique","volume":"82 2","pages":"129-138"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"[Interference of oral anti-Xa anticoagulants during monitoring of unfractionated heparin treatments: practical and future attitudes].\",\"authors\":\"Sophie Melicine, Laure Maucorps, Valérie Eschwège, Julie Carré, Dominique Helley, Isabelle Gouin-Thibault, Nicolas Gendron, Fabienne Nédélec-Gac, Laetitia Mauge\",\"doi\":\"10.1684/abc.2024.1873\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Contrary to direct oral anticoagulants (DOAC), unfractionated heparin (UFH) requires daily monitoring when administered at therapeutic dose. At present, UFH monitoring is preferably carried out by measuring plasma anti-Xa activity, however, in patients previously treated with an anti-Xa DOAC and switched to UFH, there is a high risk of DOAC interfering with the measurement of UFH anti-Xa activity. Residual anti-Xa DOAC in the sample can lead to an overestimation of the anticoagulant activity attributed to heparin and thus to incorrect anticoagulation. This risk of interference should not be overlooked because interference may occur even at concentration of DOAC below the hemostatic safety threshold and can last several days. To overcome this issue, several alternatives are being studied. This note provides an update on anti-Xa DOAC interference and different strategies available in current practice. It also underlines the importance of communication between biologists and clinicians on anticoagulant treatments received by patients.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":93870,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Annales de biologie clinique\",\"volume\":\"82 2\",\"pages\":\"129-138\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Annales de biologie clinique\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1684/abc.2024.1873\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annales de biologie clinique","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1684/abc.2024.1873","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
与直接口服抗凝血剂(DOAC)相反,如果按治疗剂量给药,则需要每天对未分离肝素(UFH)进行监测。目前,UFH 监测最好是通过测量血浆抗 Xa 活性来进行,但是,对于之前接受过抗 Xa DOAC 治疗而转用 UFH 的患者,DOAC 很有可能干扰 UFH 抗 Xa 活性的测量。样本中残留的抗 Xa DOAC 会导致高估肝素的抗凝活性,从而导致错误的抗凝治疗。这种干扰风险不容忽视,因为即使 DOAC 的浓度低于止血安全阈值,干扰也可能发生,并可持续数天。为了解决这一问题,目前正在研究几种替代方案。本说明介绍了抗 Xa DOAC 干扰的最新情况以及当前实践中可用的不同策略。它还强调了生物学家与临床医生就患者接受的抗凝治疗进行沟通的重要性。
[Interference of oral anti-Xa anticoagulants during monitoring of unfractionated heparin treatments: practical and future attitudes].
Contrary to direct oral anticoagulants (DOAC), unfractionated heparin (UFH) requires daily monitoring when administered at therapeutic dose. At present, UFH monitoring is preferably carried out by measuring plasma anti-Xa activity, however, in patients previously treated with an anti-Xa DOAC and switched to UFH, there is a high risk of DOAC interfering with the measurement of UFH anti-Xa activity. Residual anti-Xa DOAC in the sample can lead to an overestimation of the anticoagulant activity attributed to heparin and thus to incorrect anticoagulation. This risk of interference should not be overlooked because interference may occur even at concentration of DOAC below the hemostatic safety threshold and can last several days. To overcome this issue, several alternatives are being studied. This note provides an update on anti-Xa DOAC interference and different strategies available in current practice. It also underlines the importance of communication between biologists and clinicians on anticoagulant treatments received by patients.