强化物的价值可调节消退过程中的反应幅度和持续性:随机试验

IF 2.9 2区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL
Joseph M. Lambert, Maria A. Osina, Bailey A. Copeland
{"title":"强化物的价值可调节消退过程中的反应幅度和持续性:随机试验","authors":"Joseph M. Lambert,&nbsp;Maria A. Osina,&nbsp;Bailey A. Copeland","doi":"10.1002/jaba.1088","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Extinction bursts, or temporary increases in rates and intensities of behavior during extinction, can preclude the inclusion of extinction in intervention packages meant to suppress severe challenging behavior. To identify underlying behavioral mechanisms responsible for response persistence and bursting, 69 adults with developmental disabilities completed a low-stakes translational investigation employing a 2 × 2 factorial, crossed, and randomized matched blocks design, with batched randomization logic. In each of the four test groups, we made distinct antecedent manipulations with two value parameters commonly studied through behavioral economics (i.e., demand intensity, <i>P</i><sub>max</sub>) and evaluated the extent to which each of these manipulations influenced target responding during extinction. Although we found statistically significant differences attributable to both parameters, variations in reinforcer consumption relative to demand intensity were most influential across all dependent variables. This outcome implicates consumption relative to demand intensity as both a mitigating and exacerbating preextinction factor that influences the prevalence of adverse collateral extinction effects (e.g., bursts).</p>","PeriodicalId":14983,"journal":{"name":"Journal of applied behavior analysis","volume":"57 3","pages":"615-634"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/jaba.1088","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Reinforcer value moderates response magnitude and persistence during extinction: A randomized trial\",\"authors\":\"Joseph M. Lambert,&nbsp;Maria A. Osina,&nbsp;Bailey A. Copeland\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/jaba.1088\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Extinction bursts, or temporary increases in rates and intensities of behavior during extinction, can preclude the inclusion of extinction in intervention packages meant to suppress severe challenging behavior. To identify underlying behavioral mechanisms responsible for response persistence and bursting, 69 adults with developmental disabilities completed a low-stakes translational investigation employing a 2 × 2 factorial, crossed, and randomized matched blocks design, with batched randomization logic. In each of the four test groups, we made distinct antecedent manipulations with two value parameters commonly studied through behavioral economics (i.e., demand intensity, <i>P</i><sub>max</sub>) and evaluated the extent to which each of these manipulations influenced target responding during extinction. Although we found statistically significant differences attributable to both parameters, variations in reinforcer consumption relative to demand intensity were most influential across all dependent variables. This outcome implicates consumption relative to demand intensity as both a mitigating and exacerbating preextinction factor that influences the prevalence of adverse collateral extinction effects (e.g., bursts).</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14983,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of applied behavior analysis\",\"volume\":\"57 3\",\"pages\":\"615-634\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/jaba.1088\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of applied behavior analysis\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jaba.1088\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of applied behavior analysis","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jaba.1088","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

消减爆发,或消减过程中行为发生率和强度的暂时增加,可能会妨碍将消减纳入旨在抑制严重挑战行为的一揽子干预措施中。为了确定导致反应持续和爆发的潜在行为机制,69 名发育障碍成人完成了一项低风险转化调查,该调查采用了 2 × 2 系数、交叉和随机匹配区组设计,以及分批随机化逻辑。在四个测试组中,我们分别对行为经济学中常用的两个价值参数(即需求强度、Pmax)进行了不同的前因操纵,并评估了这些操纵对消退过程中目标反应的影响程度。尽管我们发现这两个参数在统计学上有显著差异,但在所有因变量中,相对于需求强度的强化物消耗量的变化影响最大。这一结果说明,相对于需求强度的强化剂消耗量既是一种减轻因素,也是一种加重因素,会影响不良的附带灭绝效应(如爆发)的发生率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Reinforcer value moderates response magnitude and persistence during extinction: A randomized trial

Reinforcer value moderates response magnitude and persistence during extinction: A randomized trial

Extinction bursts, or temporary increases in rates and intensities of behavior during extinction, can preclude the inclusion of extinction in intervention packages meant to suppress severe challenging behavior. To identify underlying behavioral mechanisms responsible for response persistence and bursting, 69 adults with developmental disabilities completed a low-stakes translational investigation employing a 2 × 2 factorial, crossed, and randomized matched blocks design, with batched randomization logic. In each of the four test groups, we made distinct antecedent manipulations with two value parameters commonly studied through behavioral economics (i.e., demand intensity, Pmax) and evaluated the extent to which each of these manipulations influenced target responding during extinction. Although we found statistically significant differences attributable to both parameters, variations in reinforcer consumption relative to demand intensity were most influential across all dependent variables. This outcome implicates consumption relative to demand intensity as both a mitigating and exacerbating preextinction factor that influences the prevalence of adverse collateral extinction effects (e.g., bursts).

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of applied behavior analysis
Journal of applied behavior analysis PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL-
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
20.70%
发文量
61
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信