解构老年非正式工作者中的年龄歧视:系统性审查

IF 1.2 Q3 SOCIOLOGY
Samuel Ampadu Oteng, Padmore Adusei Amoah, Genghua Huang
{"title":"解构老年非正式工作者中的年龄歧视:系统性审查","authors":"Samuel Ampadu Oteng, Padmore Adusei Amoah, Genghua Huang","doi":"10.1108/ijssp-03-2024-0117","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3>Purpose</h3>\n<p>This study aims to conduct a systematic review of existing literature on ageism among older informal workers, as most studies have focused on formal work settings. Specifically, it seeks to identify the scope and characteristics of ageism that older informal workers encounter and its influence on their work and well-being.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Design/methodology/approach</h3>\n<p>This paper follows the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) framework to conduct a systematic review. Eleven studies from six databases were included and thematically analysed.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Findings</h3>\n<p>The findings revealed four main themes: the contextual nature of ageism, dimensions of work-related ageism, navigating work-related challenges, and effects on well-being. These themes highlight that, despite being perceived as experienced and reliable, older informal workers face exclusion from work opportunities as they are perceived as unproductive and less capable of acquiring new skills. These negative perceptions significantly impacted their willingness to continue working and overall well-being.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Practical implications</h3>\n<p>The findings offer an overview of extant research and the direction for future research and policy interventions to address ageism among older informal workers. The findings are crucial for enhancing older workers' quality of life, particularly in low- and middle-income countries, where population ageing is the fastest.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Originality/value</h3>\n<p>This study is one of the few to systematically explore and evaluate empirical evidence on ageism in the informal work sector. It thus expands existing knowledge and understanding of the phenomenon of ageism in a least explored context.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->","PeriodicalId":47193,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy","volume":"120 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Deconstructing ageism among older informal workers: a systematic review\",\"authors\":\"Samuel Ampadu Oteng, Padmore Adusei Amoah, Genghua Huang\",\"doi\":\"10.1108/ijssp-03-2024-0117\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<h3>Purpose</h3>\\n<p>This study aims to conduct a systematic review of existing literature on ageism among older informal workers, as most studies have focused on formal work settings. Specifically, it seeks to identify the scope and characteristics of ageism that older informal workers encounter and its influence on their work and well-being.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\\n<h3>Design/methodology/approach</h3>\\n<p>This paper follows the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) framework to conduct a systematic review. Eleven studies from six databases were included and thematically analysed.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\\n<h3>Findings</h3>\\n<p>The findings revealed four main themes: the contextual nature of ageism, dimensions of work-related ageism, navigating work-related challenges, and effects on well-being. These themes highlight that, despite being perceived as experienced and reliable, older informal workers face exclusion from work opportunities as they are perceived as unproductive and less capable of acquiring new skills. These negative perceptions significantly impacted their willingness to continue working and overall well-being.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\\n<h3>Practical implications</h3>\\n<p>The findings offer an overview of extant research and the direction for future research and policy interventions to address ageism among older informal workers. The findings are crucial for enhancing older workers' quality of life, particularly in low- and middle-income countries, where population ageing is the fastest.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\\n<h3>Originality/value</h3>\\n<p>This study is one of the few to systematically explore and evaluate empirical evidence on ageism in the informal work sector. It thus expands existing knowledge and understanding of the phenomenon of ageism in a least explored context.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\",\"PeriodicalId\":47193,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy\",\"volume\":\"120 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1108/ijssp-03-2024-0117\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"SOCIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/ijssp-03-2024-0117","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SOCIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的 本研究旨在对有关老年非正式工作者中的年龄歧视的现有文献进行系统回顾,因为大多数研究都集中在正式工作环境中。具体而言,本研究旨在确定老年非正式工作者所遭遇的老龄歧视的范围和特征,及其对他们的工作和福祉的影响。设计/方法/方法本文遵循系统综述和元分析首选报告项目(PRISMA)框架进行系统综述。研究结果研究结果揭示了四大主题:老龄歧视的背景性质、与工作相关的老龄歧视的各个层面、应对与工作相关的挑战以及对幸福感的影响。这些主题突出表明,尽管老年非正规工作者被认为经验丰富、值得信赖,但由于他们被认为缺乏生产性和学习新技能的能力较低,因此面临着工作机会的排斥。这些负面看法严重影响了他们继续工作的意愿和整体福祉。研究结果对于提高老年劳动者的生活质量至关重要,尤其是在人口老龄化速度最快的中低收入国家。因此,它扩展了现有的知识,加深了人们对老龄歧视现象的理解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Deconstructing ageism among older informal workers: a systematic review

Purpose

This study aims to conduct a systematic review of existing literature on ageism among older informal workers, as most studies have focused on formal work settings. Specifically, it seeks to identify the scope and characteristics of ageism that older informal workers encounter and its influence on their work and well-being.

Design/methodology/approach

This paper follows the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) framework to conduct a systematic review. Eleven studies from six databases were included and thematically analysed.

Findings

The findings revealed four main themes: the contextual nature of ageism, dimensions of work-related ageism, navigating work-related challenges, and effects on well-being. These themes highlight that, despite being perceived as experienced and reliable, older informal workers face exclusion from work opportunities as they are perceived as unproductive and less capable of acquiring new skills. These negative perceptions significantly impacted their willingness to continue working and overall well-being.

Practical implications

The findings offer an overview of extant research and the direction for future research and policy interventions to address ageism among older informal workers. The findings are crucial for enhancing older workers' quality of life, particularly in low- and middle-income countries, where population ageing is the fastest.

Originality/value

This study is one of the few to systematically explore and evaluate empirical evidence on ageism in the informal work sector. It thus expands existing knowledge and understanding of the phenomenon of ageism in a least explored context.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
3.70%
发文量
59
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信