评论文章：心理健康护理中数字和个性化测量趋势的局限性

Pub Date : 2024-05-30 DOI:10.1177/00483931241255255

Nina S. de Boer, Rosa W. Runhardt

{"title":"评论文章：心理健康护理中数字和个性化测量趋势的局限性","authors":"Nina S. de Boer, Rosa W. Runhardt","doi":"10.1177/00483931241255255","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Limits of the Numerical calls for the (re)contextualization of the numerical in the social domain and emphasizes that using quantitative data has epistemic and practical/moral considerations that may not align. In this review essay, we evaluate these claims using a case study, viz. the personalized, clinical experience sampling method (ESM) in mental health care. This case study (1) nuances claims made in Limits of the Numerical regarding the generality and non-contextuality of numerical data, and (2) highlights two additional dimensions to the numerical that have been underexposed in the book (i.e., reactivity and Ballung concepts).","PeriodicalId":0,"journal":{"name":"","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-05-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Review Essay: Limits of the Numerical and the Personalized Measurement Trend in Mental Health Care\",\"authors\":\"Nina S. de Boer, Rosa W. Runhardt\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/00483931241255255\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Limits of the Numerical calls for the (re)contextualization of the numerical in the social domain and emphasizes that using quantitative data has epistemic and practical/moral considerations that may not align. In this review essay, we evaluate these claims using a case study, viz. the personalized, clinical experience sampling method (ESM) in mental health care. This case study (1) nuances claims made in Limits of the Numerical regarding the generality and non-contextuality of numerical data, and (2) highlights two additional dimensions to the numerical that have been underexposed in the book (i.e., reactivity and Ballung concepts).\",\"PeriodicalId\":0,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"98\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/00483931241255255\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00483931241255255","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

数字的局限性》呼吁对社会领域中的数字进行（重新）语境化，并强调使用定量数据在认识论和实践/道德方面的考虑可能并不一致。在这篇评论文章中，我们通过一个案例研究，即心理健康护理中的个性化临床经验取样法（ESM），来评估这些主张。该案例研究（1）细化了《数字的局限性》一书中关于数字数据的普遍性和非语境性的主张，（2）强调了数字的两个额外维度（即反应性和巴隆概念），而这两个维度在该书中并未得到充分展示。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文

Review Essay: Limits of the Numerical and the Personalized Measurement Trend in Mental Health Care

Limits of the Numerical calls for the (re)contextualization of the numerical in the social domain and emphasizes that using quantitative data has epistemic and practical/moral considerations that may not align. In this review essay, we evaluate these claims using a case study, viz. the personalized, clinical experience sampling method (ESM) in mental health care. This case study (1) nuances claims made in Limits of the Numerical regarding the generality and non-contextuality of numerical data, and (2) highlights two additional dimensions to the numerical that have been underexposed in the book (i.e., reactivity and Ballung concepts).

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助