膝关节骨关节炎远程监控技术的可用性评估

IF 2.7 Q3 ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL
Andrea Cafarelli;Angela Sorriento;Giorgia Marola;Denise Amram;Fabien Rabusseau;Hervé Locteau;Paolo Cabras;Erik Dumont;Sam Nakhaei;Ake Jernberger;Pär Bergsten;Paolo Spinnato;Alessandro Russo;Leonardo Ricotti
{"title":"膝关节骨关节炎远程监控技术的可用性评估","authors":"Andrea Cafarelli;Angela Sorriento;Giorgia Marola;Denise Amram;Fabien Rabusseau;Hervé Locteau;Paolo Cabras;Erik Dumont;Sam Nakhaei;Ake Jernberger;Pär Bergsten;Paolo Spinnato;Alessandro Russo;Leonardo Ricotti","doi":"10.1109/OJEMB.2024.3407961","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<italic>Goal</i>\n: To evaluate the usability of different technologies designed for a remote assessment of knee osteoarthritis. \n<italic>Methods:</i>\n We recruited eleven patients affected by mild or moderate knee osteoarthritis, eleven caregivers, and eleven clinicians to assess the following technologies: a wristband for monitoring physical activity, an examination chair for measuring leg extension, a thermal camera for acquiring skin thermographic data, a force balance for measuring center of pressure, an ultrasound imaging system for remote echographic acquisition, a mobile app, and a clinical portal software. Specific questionnaires scoring usability were filled out by patients, caregivers and clinicians. \n<italic>Results:</i>\n The questionnaires highlighted a good level of usability and user-friendliness for all the technologies, obtaining an average score of 8.7 provided by the patients, 8.8 by the caregivers, and 8.5 by the clinicians, on a scale ranging from 0 to 10. Such average scores were calculated by putting together the scores obtained for the single technologies under evaluation and averaging them. \n<italic>Conclusions:</i>\n This study demonstrates a high level of acceptability for the tested portable technologies designed for a potentially remote and frequent assessment of knee osteoarthritis.","PeriodicalId":33825,"journal":{"name":"IEEE Open Journal of Engineering in Medicine and Biology","volume":"5 ","pages":"476-484"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/stamp/stamp.jsp?tp=&arnumber=10543164","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Usability Assessment of Technologies for Remote Monitoring of Knee Osteoarthritis\",\"authors\":\"Andrea Cafarelli;Angela Sorriento;Giorgia Marola;Denise Amram;Fabien Rabusseau;Hervé Locteau;Paolo Cabras;Erik Dumont;Sam Nakhaei;Ake Jernberger;Pär Bergsten;Paolo Spinnato;Alessandro Russo;Leonardo Ricotti\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/OJEMB.2024.3407961\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<italic>Goal</i>\\n: To evaluate the usability of different technologies designed for a remote assessment of knee osteoarthritis. \\n<italic>Methods:</i>\\n We recruited eleven patients affected by mild or moderate knee osteoarthritis, eleven caregivers, and eleven clinicians to assess the following technologies: a wristband for monitoring physical activity, an examination chair for measuring leg extension, a thermal camera for acquiring skin thermographic data, a force balance for measuring center of pressure, an ultrasound imaging system for remote echographic acquisition, a mobile app, and a clinical portal software. Specific questionnaires scoring usability were filled out by patients, caregivers and clinicians. \\n<italic>Results:</i>\\n The questionnaires highlighted a good level of usability and user-friendliness for all the technologies, obtaining an average score of 8.7 provided by the patients, 8.8 by the caregivers, and 8.5 by the clinicians, on a scale ranging from 0 to 10. Such average scores were calculated by putting together the scores obtained for the single technologies under evaluation and averaging them. \\n<italic>Conclusions:</i>\\n This study demonstrates a high level of acceptability for the tested portable technologies designed for a potentially remote and frequent assessment of knee osteoarthritis.\",\"PeriodicalId\":33825,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"IEEE Open Journal of Engineering in Medicine and Biology\",\"volume\":\"5 \",\"pages\":\"476-484\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/stamp/stamp.jsp?tp=&arnumber=10543164\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"IEEE Open Journal of Engineering in Medicine and Biology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/10543164/\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IEEE Open Journal of Engineering in Medicine and Biology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/10543164/","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目标:评估为远程评估膝关节骨关节炎而设计的不同技术的可用性。方法:我们招募了 11 名轻度或中度膝关节骨性关节炎患者、11 名护理人员:我们招募了 11 名轻度或中度膝关节骨关节炎患者、11 名护理人员和 11 名临床医生,对以下技术进行评估:用于监测身体活动的腕带、用于测量腿部伸展度的检查椅、用于获取皮肤热成像数据的热像仪、用于测量压力中心的力天平、用于远程回声成像采集的超声波成像系统、移动应用程序和临床门户软件。患者、护理人员和临床医生填写了专门的可用性调查问卷。结果显示在 0-10 分的评分范围内,患者、护理人员和临床医生的平均得分分别为 8.7 分、8.8 分和 8.5 分。这些平均分的计算方法是将单项评估技术的得分相加并取平均值。结论这项研究表明,受测的便携式技术具有很高的可接受性,可以对膝关节骨关节炎进行远程和频繁的评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Usability Assessment of Technologies for Remote Monitoring of Knee Osteoarthritis
Goal : To evaluate the usability of different technologies designed for a remote assessment of knee osteoarthritis. Methods: We recruited eleven patients affected by mild or moderate knee osteoarthritis, eleven caregivers, and eleven clinicians to assess the following technologies: a wristband for monitoring physical activity, an examination chair for measuring leg extension, a thermal camera for acquiring skin thermographic data, a force balance for measuring center of pressure, an ultrasound imaging system for remote echographic acquisition, a mobile app, and a clinical portal software. Specific questionnaires scoring usability were filled out by patients, caregivers and clinicians. Results: The questionnaires highlighted a good level of usability and user-friendliness for all the technologies, obtaining an average score of 8.7 provided by the patients, 8.8 by the caregivers, and 8.5 by the clinicians, on a scale ranging from 0 to 10. Such average scores were calculated by putting together the scores obtained for the single technologies under evaluation and averaging them. Conclusions: This study demonstrates a high level of acceptability for the tested portable technologies designed for a potentially remote and frequent assessment of knee osteoarthritis.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.50
自引率
3.40%
发文量
20
审稿时长
10 weeks
期刊介绍: The IEEE Open Journal of Engineering in Medicine and Biology (IEEE OJEMB) is dedicated to serving the community of innovators in medicine, technology, and the sciences, with the core goal of advancing the highest-quality interdisciplinary research between these disciplines. The journal firmly believes that the future of medicine depends on close collaboration between biology and technology, and that fostering interaction between these fields is an important way to advance key discoveries that can improve clinical care.IEEE OJEMB is a gold open access journal in which the authors retain the copyright to their papers and readers have free access to the full text and PDFs on the IEEE Xplore® Digital Library. However, authors are required to pay an article processing fee at the time their paper is accepted for publication, using to cover the cost of publication.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信