Taher K Eleiwa, Qais A Dihan, Andrew D Brown, Ana T Zaldivar, Seif E Abdelnaem, Ahmed B Sallam, Paul H Phillips, Ayman G Elnahry, Abdelrahman M Elhusseiny
{"title":"白血病在线信息的质量、可靠性、可读性和问责制。","authors":"Taher K Eleiwa, Qais A Dihan, Andrew D Brown, Ana T Zaldivar, Seif E Abdelnaem, Ahmed B Sallam, Paul H Phillips, Ayman G Elnahry, Abdelrahman M Elhusseiny","doi":"10.3928/01913913-20240425-02","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To evaluate the quality, reliability, and readability of online patient educational materials on leukocoria.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this cross-sectional study, the Google search engine was searched for the terms \"leukocoria\" and \"white pupil.\" The first 50 search outcomes were evaluated for each search term based on predefined inclusion criteria, excluding duplicates, peer-reviewed papers, forum posts, paywalled content, and multimedia links. Sources were categorized as \"institutional\" or \"private.\" Three independent raters assessed each web-site for quality and reliability using DISCERN, Health on the Net Code of Conduct (HONcode), and JAMA criteria. Readability was evaluated using seven formulas: Flesch Reading Ease (FRE), Flesch-Kincaid Grade Level (FKGL), Simple Measure of Gobbledygook (SMOG) Index, Automated Readability Index (ARI), Linsear Write (LW), Gunning Fog Index (GFI), and Coleman-Liau Index (CLI).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 51 websites were included. Quality, assessed by the DISCERN tool, showed a median score of 4, denoting moderate to high quality, with no significant differences between institutional and private sites or search terms. HONcode scores indicated variable reliability and trustworthiness (median: 10, range: 3 to 16), with institutional sites excelling in financial disclosure and ad differentiation. Additionally, institutional and private sites performed well in reliability and accountability, as measured by the JAMA Benchmark criteria (median: 3; range: 1 to 4). Readability, averaging an 11.3 ± 3.7 grade level, did not differ significantly between site types or search terms, consistently falling short of the recommended sixth-grade level for patient educational materials.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The patient educational materials on leukocoria demonstrated moderate to high quality, commendable reliability, and accountability. However, the readability scores were above the recommended level for the layperson. <b>[<i>J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus</i>. 2024;61(5):332-338.]</b>.</p>","PeriodicalId":50095,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pediatric Ophthalmology & Strabismus","volume":" ","pages":"332-338"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Quality, Reliability, Readability, and Accountability of Online Information on Leukocoria.\",\"authors\":\"Taher K Eleiwa, Qais A Dihan, Andrew D Brown, Ana T Zaldivar, Seif E Abdelnaem, Ahmed B Sallam, Paul H Phillips, Ayman G Elnahry, Abdelrahman M Elhusseiny\",\"doi\":\"10.3928/01913913-20240425-02\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To evaluate the quality, reliability, and readability of online patient educational materials on leukocoria.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this cross-sectional study, the Google search engine was searched for the terms \\\"leukocoria\\\" and \\\"white pupil.\\\" The first 50 search outcomes were evaluated for each search term based on predefined inclusion criteria, excluding duplicates, peer-reviewed papers, forum posts, paywalled content, and multimedia links. Sources were categorized as \\\"institutional\\\" or \\\"private.\\\" Three independent raters assessed each web-site for quality and reliability using DISCERN, Health on the Net Code of Conduct (HONcode), and JAMA criteria. Readability was evaluated using seven formulas: Flesch Reading Ease (FRE), Flesch-Kincaid Grade Level (FKGL), Simple Measure of Gobbledygook (SMOG) Index, Automated Readability Index (ARI), Linsear Write (LW), Gunning Fog Index (GFI), and Coleman-Liau Index (CLI).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 51 websites were included. Quality, assessed by the DISCERN tool, showed a median score of 4, denoting moderate to high quality, with no significant differences between institutional and private sites or search terms. HONcode scores indicated variable reliability and trustworthiness (median: 10, range: 3 to 16), with institutional sites excelling in financial disclosure and ad differentiation. Additionally, institutional and private sites performed well in reliability and accountability, as measured by the JAMA Benchmark criteria (median: 3; range: 1 to 4). Readability, averaging an 11.3 ± 3.7 grade level, did not differ significantly between site types or search terms, consistently falling short of the recommended sixth-grade level for patient educational materials.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The patient educational materials on leukocoria demonstrated moderate to high quality, commendable reliability, and accountability. However, the readability scores were above the recommended level for the layperson. <b>[<i>J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus</i>. 2024;61(5):332-338.]</b>.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50095,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Pediatric Ophthalmology & Strabismus\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"332-338\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Pediatric Ophthalmology & Strabismus\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3928/01913913-20240425-02\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/5/30 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"OPHTHALMOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Pediatric Ophthalmology & Strabismus","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3928/01913913-20240425-02","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/5/30 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的:评估有关白瞳的在线患者教育材料的质量、可靠性和可读性:在这项横向研究中,我们在谷歌搜索引擎上搜索了 "白瞳 "和 "白瞳 "这两个词。根据预定义的纳入标准,对每个搜索词的前 50 个搜索结果进行评估,排除重复内容、同行评审论文、论坛帖子、付费内容和多媒体链接。来源被分为 "机构 "和 "私人 "两类。三位独立评分员使用 DISCERN、Health on the Net Code of Conduct (HONcode) 和 JAMA 标准对每个网站的质量和可靠性进行评估。可读性使用七个公式进行评估:Flesch Reading Ease (FRE)、Flesch-Kincaid Grade Level (FKGL)、Simple Measure of Gobbledygook (SMOG) Index、Automated Readability Index (ARI)、Linsear Write (LW)、Gunning Fog Index (GFI) 和 Coleman-Liau Index (CLI):共纳入 51 个网站。通过 DISCERN 工具进行的质量评估显示,中位数为 4 分,表示质量为中上等,机构网站与私人网站或搜索词之间没有显著差异。HONcode 分数显示了不同的可靠性和可信度(中位数:10,范围:3 至 16),其中机构网站在财务披露和广告区分方面表现突出。此外,根据《美国医学会杂志》基准标准(中位数:3;范围:1 至 4),机构网站和私营网站在可靠性和问责制方面表现出色。可读性平均为 11.3 ± 3.7 级,不同网站类型或搜索条件之间没有显著差异,始终低于建议的患者教育材料六级水平:结论:有关白癫风的患者教育材料显示出中等到较高的质量、值得称赞的可靠性和责任性。然而,可读性得分高于建议的非专业人士水平。[J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus.
Quality, Reliability, Readability, and Accountability of Online Information on Leukocoria.
Purpose: To evaluate the quality, reliability, and readability of online patient educational materials on leukocoria.
Methods: In this cross-sectional study, the Google search engine was searched for the terms "leukocoria" and "white pupil." The first 50 search outcomes were evaluated for each search term based on predefined inclusion criteria, excluding duplicates, peer-reviewed papers, forum posts, paywalled content, and multimedia links. Sources were categorized as "institutional" or "private." Three independent raters assessed each web-site for quality and reliability using DISCERN, Health on the Net Code of Conduct (HONcode), and JAMA criteria. Readability was evaluated using seven formulas: Flesch Reading Ease (FRE), Flesch-Kincaid Grade Level (FKGL), Simple Measure of Gobbledygook (SMOG) Index, Automated Readability Index (ARI), Linsear Write (LW), Gunning Fog Index (GFI), and Coleman-Liau Index (CLI).
Results: A total of 51 websites were included. Quality, assessed by the DISCERN tool, showed a median score of 4, denoting moderate to high quality, with no significant differences between institutional and private sites or search terms. HONcode scores indicated variable reliability and trustworthiness (median: 10, range: 3 to 16), with institutional sites excelling in financial disclosure and ad differentiation. Additionally, institutional and private sites performed well in reliability and accountability, as measured by the JAMA Benchmark criteria (median: 3; range: 1 to 4). Readability, averaging an 11.3 ± 3.7 grade level, did not differ significantly between site types or search terms, consistently falling short of the recommended sixth-grade level for patient educational materials.
Conclusions: The patient educational materials on leukocoria demonstrated moderate to high quality, commendable reliability, and accountability. However, the readability scores were above the recommended level for the layperson. [J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus. 2024;61(5):332-338.].
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Pediatric Ophthalmology & Strabismus is a bimonthly peer-reviewed publication for pediatric ophthalmologists. The Journal has published original articles on the diagnosis, treatment, and prevention of eye disorders in the pediatric age group and the treatment of strabismus in all age groups for over 50 years.