不同厚度和两种烧结技术的整体氧化锆抗弯强度比较评估

IF 1.7 Q3 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
Nilofar Karbasian, Amirhossein Fathi, Pirooz Givehchian, Saeed Nosouhian, Mohammad Jamshidian, Farhad Almassi, Ali Fazeli
{"title":"不同厚度和两种烧结技术的整体氧化锆抗弯强度比较评估","authors":"Nilofar Karbasian,&nbsp;Amirhossein Fathi,&nbsp;Pirooz Givehchian,&nbsp;Saeed Nosouhian,&nbsp;Mohammad Jamshidian,&nbsp;Farhad Almassi,&nbsp;Ali Fazeli","doi":"10.1002/cre2.856","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objectives</h3>\n \n <p>This study aimed to compare the flexural strength of monolithic zirconia with different thicknesses and two sintering techniques.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Materials and Methods</h3>\n \n <p>This in vitro, experimental study was conducted on 28 monolithic zirconia discs with 10 mm diameter and 0.5 (<i>n</i> = 14) and 1.2 mm (<i>n</i> = 14) thickness. Each group was divided into two subgroups (<i>n</i> = 7) for fast (60 min) and conventional (120 min) sintering at 1450°C. After sintering, the specimens were thermocycled and their flexural strength was measured by piston-on-3-balls technique in a universal testing machine (0.5 mm/min, 1.2 mm pin diameter). Data were analyzed by the Weibull test, one-way analysis of variance, and Tukey's test (<i>α</i> = .05).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>The flexural strength of specimens with 1.2 mm thickness was significantly higher than that of specimens with 0.5 mm thickness (<i>p</i> &lt; .05). The flexural strength of 1.2 mm/120-min group was slightly, but not significantly, higher than that of 1.2 mm/60-min group (<i>p</i> &gt; .05). The flexural strength of 0.5 mm/120-min group was slightly, but not significantly, higher than that of 0.5 mm/60-min group (<i>p</i> &gt; .05).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>The increase in thickness of monolithic zirconia increases its flexural strength; however, increasing the sintering time appears to have no significant effect on the flexural strength of monolithic zirconia.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":10203,"journal":{"name":"Clinical and Experimental Dental Research","volume":"10 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/cre2.856","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparative assessment of flexural strength of monolithic zirconia with different thicknesses and two sintering techniques\",\"authors\":\"Nilofar Karbasian,&nbsp;Amirhossein Fathi,&nbsp;Pirooz Givehchian,&nbsp;Saeed Nosouhian,&nbsp;Mohammad Jamshidian,&nbsp;Farhad Almassi,&nbsp;Ali Fazeli\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/cre2.856\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Objectives</h3>\\n \\n <p>This study aimed to compare the flexural strength of monolithic zirconia with different thicknesses and two sintering techniques.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Materials and Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>This in vitro, experimental study was conducted on 28 monolithic zirconia discs with 10 mm diameter and 0.5 (<i>n</i> = 14) and 1.2 mm (<i>n</i> = 14) thickness. Each group was divided into two subgroups (<i>n</i> = 7) for fast (60 min) and conventional (120 min) sintering at 1450°C. After sintering, the specimens were thermocycled and their flexural strength was measured by piston-on-3-balls technique in a universal testing machine (0.5 mm/min, 1.2 mm pin diameter). Data were analyzed by the Weibull test, one-way analysis of variance, and Tukey's test (<i>α</i> = .05).</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>The flexural strength of specimens with 1.2 mm thickness was significantly higher than that of specimens with 0.5 mm thickness (<i>p</i> &lt; .05). The flexural strength of 1.2 mm/120-min group was slightly, but not significantly, higher than that of 1.2 mm/60-min group (<i>p</i> &gt; .05). The flexural strength of 0.5 mm/120-min group was slightly, but not significantly, higher than that of 0.5 mm/60-min group (<i>p</i> &gt; .05).</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\\n \\n <p>The increase in thickness of monolithic zirconia increases its flexural strength; however, increasing the sintering time appears to have no significant effect on the flexural strength of monolithic zirconia.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10203,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical and Experimental Dental Research\",\"volume\":\"10 3\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/cre2.856\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical and Experimental Dental Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/cre2.856\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical and Experimental Dental Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/cre2.856","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

研究目的本研究旨在比较不同厚度和两种烧结技术的整体氧化锆的抗弯强度:这项体外实验研究的对象是 28 个直径为 10 毫米、厚度为 0.5 毫米(n = 14)和 1.2 毫米(n = 14)的整体氧化锆盘。每组分为两个子组(n = 7),分别在 1450°C 下进行快速(60 分钟)和传统(120 分钟)烧结。烧结后,对试样进行热循环,并在万能试验机(0.5 毫米/分钟,针直径 1.2 毫米)上采用活塞对 3 球技术测量其抗弯强度。数据分析采用 Weibull 检验、单因素方差分析和 Tukey 检验(α = .05):结果:厚度为 1.2 毫米的试样的抗弯强度明显高于厚度为 0.5 毫米的试样(p .05)。0.5 毫米/120 分钟组的抗折强度略高于 0.5 毫米/60 分钟组,但不明显(p > .05):结论:增加整体氧化锆的厚度可提高其抗弯强度;但增加烧结时间似乎对整体氧化锆的抗弯强度没有明显影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Comparative assessment of flexural strength of monolithic zirconia with different thicknesses and two sintering techniques

Comparative assessment of flexural strength of monolithic zirconia with different thicknesses and two sintering techniques

Objectives

This study aimed to compare the flexural strength of monolithic zirconia with different thicknesses and two sintering techniques.

Materials and Methods

This in vitro, experimental study was conducted on 28 monolithic zirconia discs with 10 mm diameter and 0.5 (n = 14) and 1.2 mm (n = 14) thickness. Each group was divided into two subgroups (n = 7) for fast (60 min) and conventional (120 min) sintering at 1450°C. After sintering, the specimens were thermocycled and their flexural strength was measured by piston-on-3-balls technique in a universal testing machine (0.5 mm/min, 1.2 mm pin diameter). Data were analyzed by the Weibull test, one-way analysis of variance, and Tukey's test (α = .05).

Results

The flexural strength of specimens with 1.2 mm thickness was significantly higher than that of specimens with 0.5 mm thickness (p < .05). The flexural strength of 1.2 mm/120-min group was slightly, but not significantly, higher than that of 1.2 mm/60-min group (p > .05). The flexural strength of 0.5 mm/120-min group was slightly, but not significantly, higher than that of 0.5 mm/60-min group (p > .05).

Conclusion

The increase in thickness of monolithic zirconia increases its flexural strength; however, increasing the sintering time appears to have no significant effect on the flexural strength of monolithic zirconia.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Clinical and Experimental Dental Research
Clinical and Experimental Dental Research DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE-
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
5.60%
发文量
165
审稿时长
26 weeks
期刊介绍: Clinical and Experimental Dental Research aims to provide open access peer-reviewed publications of high scientific quality representing original clinical, diagnostic or experimental work within all disciplines and fields of oral medicine and dentistry. The scope of Clinical and Experimental Dental Research comprises original research material on the anatomy, physiology and pathology of oro-facial, oro-pharyngeal and maxillofacial tissues, and functions and dysfunctions within the stomatognathic system, and the epidemiology, aetiology, prevention, diagnosis, prognosis and therapy of diseases and conditions that have an effect on the homeostasis of the mouth, jaws, and closely associated structures, as well as the healing and regeneration and the clinical aspects of replacement of hard and soft tissues with biomaterials, and the rehabilitation of stomatognathic functions. Studies that bring new knowledge on how to advance health on the individual or public health levels, including interactions between oral and general health and ill-health are welcome.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信