体外生命支持组织注册中心的 COVID-19 成人患者从静脉转为静脉或混合体外膜氧合的疗效。

IF 3.1 3区 医学 Q2 ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL
ASAIO Journal Pub Date : 2024-12-01 Epub Date: 2024-05-28 DOI:10.1097/MAT.0000000000002243
Khoa Nguyen, Ahmed Altibi, Pooja Prasad, Srini Mukundan, Kiran Shekar, Kollengode Ramanathan, Bishoy Zakhary
{"title":"体外生命支持组织注册中心的 COVID-19 成人患者从静脉转为静脉或混合体外膜氧合的疗效。","authors":"Khoa Nguyen, Ahmed Altibi, Pooja Prasad, Srini Mukundan, Kiran Shekar, Kollengode Ramanathan, Bishoy Zakhary","doi":"10.1097/MAT.0000000000002243","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This retrospective analysis of the Extracorporeal Life Support Organization (ELSO) registry evaluates the outcomes and identifies risk factors associated with conversion from initial venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) support to venoarterial or hybrid ECMO in patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). We collected deidentified data on all adult patients (≥18 years old) diagnosed with COVID who received venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation between March 2020 and November 2022. Patients initially placed on an ECMO configuration other than venovenous (VV) ECMO were excluded from the analysis. Our analysis included data from 12,850 patients, of which 393 (3.1%) transitioned from VV ECMO to an alternative mode. The primary outcome measure was in-hospital mortality, and the conversion group exhibited a higher in-hospital mortality rate. We also examined baseline variables, including demographic information, biochemical labs, and inotrope requirements. Univariate analysis revealed that pre-ECMO arrest, the need for renal replacement therapy, and the use of inotropic agents, particularly milrinone, were strongly associated with the risk of conversion. Notably, even after implementing a 3:1 propensity score matching, the impact of conversion on both mortality and complications remained substantial. Our study underscores an elevated risk of mortality for COVID-19 patients initially treated with VV ECMO who subsequently require conversion to VA-ECMO or hybrid ECMO.</p>","PeriodicalId":8844,"journal":{"name":"ASAIO Journal","volume":" ","pages":"1040-1045"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Outcomes of Adult Patients With COVID-19 Transitioning From Venovenous to Venoarterial or Hybrid Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation in the Extracorporeal Life Support Organization Registry.\",\"authors\":\"Khoa Nguyen, Ahmed Altibi, Pooja Prasad, Srini Mukundan, Kiran Shekar, Kollengode Ramanathan, Bishoy Zakhary\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/MAT.0000000000002243\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>This retrospective analysis of the Extracorporeal Life Support Organization (ELSO) registry evaluates the outcomes and identifies risk factors associated with conversion from initial venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) support to venoarterial or hybrid ECMO in patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). We collected deidentified data on all adult patients (≥18 years old) diagnosed with COVID who received venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation between March 2020 and November 2022. Patients initially placed on an ECMO configuration other than venovenous (VV) ECMO were excluded from the analysis. Our analysis included data from 12,850 patients, of which 393 (3.1%) transitioned from VV ECMO to an alternative mode. The primary outcome measure was in-hospital mortality, and the conversion group exhibited a higher in-hospital mortality rate. We also examined baseline variables, including demographic information, biochemical labs, and inotrope requirements. Univariate analysis revealed that pre-ECMO arrest, the need for renal replacement therapy, and the use of inotropic agents, particularly milrinone, were strongly associated with the risk of conversion. Notably, even after implementing a 3:1 propensity score matching, the impact of conversion on both mortality and complications remained substantial. Our study underscores an elevated risk of mortality for COVID-19 patients initially treated with VV ECMO who subsequently require conversion to VA-ECMO or hybrid ECMO.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8844,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ASAIO Journal\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1040-1045\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ASAIO Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/MAT.0000000000002243\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/5/28 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ASAIO Journal","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/MAT.0000000000002243","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/5/28 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

这项对体外生命支持组织(ELSO)登记处的回顾性分析评估了冠状病毒病2019(COVID-19)患者从最初的静脉体外膜氧合(ECMO)支持转为静脉动脉或混合ECMO的结果并确定了相关风险因素。我们收集了在 2020 年 3 月至 2022 年 11 月期间接受静脉体外膜氧合的所有确诊为 COVID 的成年患者(≥18 岁)的去身份化数据。分析中不包括最初接受静脉 (VV) ECMO 以外的 ECMO 配置的患者。我们的分析包括 12,850 名患者的数据,其中 393 人(3.1%)从 VV ECMO 转为其他模式。主要结果指标是院内死亡率,转换组的院内死亡率较高。我们还研究了基线变量,包括人口统计学信息、生化实验室和肌力药物需求。单变量分析表明,ECMO术前停机、需要肾脏替代疗法、使用肌力药物(尤其是米力农)与转归风险密切相关。值得注意的是,即使进行了 3:1 倾向评分匹配,转归对死亡率和并发症的影响仍然很大。我们的研究强调,最初接受 VV ECMO 治疗的 COVID-19 患者,如果随后需要转为 VA-ECMO 或混合 ECMO,其死亡风险会升高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Outcomes of Adult Patients With COVID-19 Transitioning From Venovenous to Venoarterial or Hybrid Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation in the Extracorporeal Life Support Organization Registry.

This retrospective analysis of the Extracorporeal Life Support Organization (ELSO) registry evaluates the outcomes and identifies risk factors associated with conversion from initial venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) support to venoarterial or hybrid ECMO in patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). We collected deidentified data on all adult patients (≥18 years old) diagnosed with COVID who received venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation between March 2020 and November 2022. Patients initially placed on an ECMO configuration other than venovenous (VV) ECMO were excluded from the analysis. Our analysis included data from 12,850 patients, of which 393 (3.1%) transitioned from VV ECMO to an alternative mode. The primary outcome measure was in-hospital mortality, and the conversion group exhibited a higher in-hospital mortality rate. We also examined baseline variables, including demographic information, biochemical labs, and inotrope requirements. Univariate analysis revealed that pre-ECMO arrest, the need for renal replacement therapy, and the use of inotropic agents, particularly milrinone, were strongly associated with the risk of conversion. Notably, even after implementing a 3:1 propensity score matching, the impact of conversion on both mortality and complications remained substantial. Our study underscores an elevated risk of mortality for COVID-19 patients initially treated with VV ECMO who subsequently require conversion to VA-ECMO or hybrid ECMO.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
ASAIO Journal
ASAIO Journal 医学-工程:生物医学
CiteScore
6.60
自引率
7.10%
发文量
651
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: ASAIO Journal is in the forefront of artificial organ research and development. On the cutting edge of innovative technology, it features peer-reviewed articles of the highest quality that describe research, development, the most recent advances in the design of artificial organ devices and findings from initial testing. Bimonthly, the ASAIO Journal features state-of-the-art investigations, laboratory and clinical trials, and discussions and opinions from experts around the world. The official publication of the American Society for Artificial Internal Organs.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信