用聚丙烯纤维加固的水泥稳定疏浚沉积物的拉伸强度特性

IF 2.9 3区 工程技术 Q2 ENGINEERING, CIVIL
Lei Lang, Jiangshan Li, Xin Chen, Lijun Han, Ping Wang
{"title":"用聚丙烯纤维加固的水泥稳定疏浚沉积物的拉伸强度特性","authors":"Lei Lang, Jiangshan Li, Xin Chen, Lijun Han, Ping Wang","doi":"10.1007/s11709-024-1072-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>This study evaluated the feasibility of using polypropylene fiber (PF) as reinforcement in improving tensile strength behavior of cement-stabilized dredged sediment (CDS). The effects of cement content, water content, PF content and length on the tensile strength and stress–strain behavioral evolutions were evaluated by conducting splitting tensile strength tests. Furthermore, the micro-mechanisms characterizing the tensile strength behavior inside PF-reinforced CDS (CPFDS) were clarified via analyzing macro failure and microstructure images. The results indicate that the highest tensile strengths of 7, 28, 60, and 90 d CPFDS were reached at PF contents of 0.6%, 1.0%, 1.0%, and 1.0%, exhibiting values 5.96%, 65.16%, 34.10%, and 35.83% higher than those of CDS, respectively. Short, 3 mm, PF of showed the best reinforcement efficiency. The CPFDS exhibited obvious tensile strain-hardening characteristic, and also had better ductility than CDS. The mix factor (<i>C</i><sub>C</sub><sup><i>a</i></sup>/<i>C</i><sub>w</sub><sup><i>b</i></sup>) and time parameter (<i>q</i><sub>t0</sub>(<i>t</i>)) of CDS, and the reinforcement index (<i>k</i><sub>t-PF</sub>) of CPFDS were used to establish the tensile strength prediction models of CDS and CPFDS, considering multiple factors. The PF “bridge effect” and associated cementation-reinforcement coupling actions inside CPFDS were mainly responsible for tensile strength behavior improvement. The key findings contribute to the use of CPFDS as recycled engineering soils.</p>","PeriodicalId":12476,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers of Structural and Civil Engineering","volume":"231 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Tensile strength behavior of cement-stabilized dredged sediment reinforced by polypropylene fiber\",\"authors\":\"Lei Lang, Jiangshan Li, Xin Chen, Lijun Han, Ping Wang\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s11709-024-1072-4\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>This study evaluated the feasibility of using polypropylene fiber (PF) as reinforcement in improving tensile strength behavior of cement-stabilized dredged sediment (CDS). The effects of cement content, water content, PF content and length on the tensile strength and stress–strain behavioral evolutions were evaluated by conducting splitting tensile strength tests. Furthermore, the micro-mechanisms characterizing the tensile strength behavior inside PF-reinforced CDS (CPFDS) were clarified via analyzing macro failure and microstructure images. The results indicate that the highest tensile strengths of 7, 28, 60, and 90 d CPFDS were reached at PF contents of 0.6%, 1.0%, 1.0%, and 1.0%, exhibiting values 5.96%, 65.16%, 34.10%, and 35.83% higher than those of CDS, respectively. Short, 3 mm, PF of showed the best reinforcement efficiency. The CPFDS exhibited obvious tensile strain-hardening characteristic, and also had better ductility than CDS. The mix factor (<i>C</i><sub>C</sub><sup><i>a</i></sup>/<i>C</i><sub>w</sub><sup><i>b</i></sup>) and time parameter (<i>q</i><sub>t0</sub>(<i>t</i>)) of CDS, and the reinforcement index (<i>k</i><sub>t-PF</sub>) of CPFDS were used to establish the tensile strength prediction models of CDS and CPFDS, considering multiple factors. The PF “bridge effect” and associated cementation-reinforcement coupling actions inside CPFDS were mainly responsible for tensile strength behavior improvement. The key findings contribute to the use of CPFDS as recycled engineering soils.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12476,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Frontiers of Structural and Civil Engineering\",\"volume\":\"231 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Frontiers of Structural and Civil Engineering\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11709-024-1072-4\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, CIVIL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers of Structural and Civil Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11709-024-1072-4","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CIVIL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究评估了使用聚丙烯纤维(PF)作为增强材料改善水泥稳定疏浚沉积物(CDS)抗拉强度行为的可行性。通过进行劈裂拉伸强度试验,评估了水泥含量、含水量、聚丙烯纤维含量和长度对拉伸强度和应力应变行为演变的影响。此外,还通过分析宏观破坏和微观结构图像,阐明了 PF 增强 CDS(CPFDS)内部抗拉强度行为的微观机制特征。结果表明,当 PF 含量分别为 0.6%、1.0%、1.0% 和 1.0% 时,7、28、60 和 90 d CPFDS 的拉伸强度最高,分别比 CDS 高出 5.96%、65.16%、34.10% 和 35.83%。3 毫米短 PF 的加固效率最高。CPFDS 表现出明显的拉伸应变硬化特征,延展性也优于 CDS。综合考虑多种因素,利用 CDS 的混合系数(CCa/Cwb)和时间参数(qt0(t))以及 CPFDS 的加固指数(kt-PF),建立了 CDS 和 CPFDS 的抗拉强度预测模型。CPFDS 内部的 PF "桥效应 "和相关的胶结-加固耦合作用是抗拉强度行为改善的主要原因。这些重要发现有助于将 CPFDS 用作再生工程土。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Tensile strength behavior of cement-stabilized dredged sediment reinforced by polypropylene fiber

This study evaluated the feasibility of using polypropylene fiber (PF) as reinforcement in improving tensile strength behavior of cement-stabilized dredged sediment (CDS). The effects of cement content, water content, PF content and length on the tensile strength and stress–strain behavioral evolutions were evaluated by conducting splitting tensile strength tests. Furthermore, the micro-mechanisms characterizing the tensile strength behavior inside PF-reinforced CDS (CPFDS) were clarified via analyzing macro failure and microstructure images. The results indicate that the highest tensile strengths of 7, 28, 60, and 90 d CPFDS were reached at PF contents of 0.6%, 1.0%, 1.0%, and 1.0%, exhibiting values 5.96%, 65.16%, 34.10%, and 35.83% higher than those of CDS, respectively. Short, 3 mm, PF of showed the best reinforcement efficiency. The CPFDS exhibited obvious tensile strain-hardening characteristic, and also had better ductility than CDS. The mix factor (CCa/Cwb) and time parameter (qt0(t)) of CDS, and the reinforcement index (kt-PF) of CPFDS were used to establish the tensile strength prediction models of CDS and CPFDS, considering multiple factors. The PF “bridge effect” and associated cementation-reinforcement coupling actions inside CPFDS were mainly responsible for tensile strength behavior improvement. The key findings contribute to the use of CPFDS as recycled engineering soils.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
3.30%
发文量
734
期刊介绍: Frontiers of Structural and Civil Engineering is an international journal that publishes original research papers, review articles and case studies related to civil and structural engineering. Topics include but are not limited to the latest developments in building and bridge structures, geotechnical engineering, hydraulic engineering, coastal engineering, and transport engineering. Case studies that demonstrate the successful applications of cutting-edge research technologies are welcome. The journal also promotes and publishes interdisciplinary research and applications connecting civil engineering and other disciplines, such as bio-, info-, nano- and social sciences and technology. Manuscripts submitted for publication will be subject to a stringent peer review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信