韩国使用图形组织器进行干预的效果:荟萃分析

IF 2.3 3区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Jechun An, Dong-il Kim
{"title":"韩国使用图形组织器进行干预的效果:荟萃分析","authors":"Jechun An,&nbsp;Dong-il Kim","doi":"10.1007/s12564-024-09965-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This study aimed to evaluate the effects of intervention using graphic organizers on the cognitive and affective improvement of students with intellectual disability (ID), with learning disability (LD), without disability, and at-risk learners in Korea. A total of 49 peer-reviewed journals and dissertations for the last 20 years were included for conducting this meta-analysis. The overall effect size of intervention using a graphic organizer was .78 (<i>d</i>) (95% CI [.63, .94], <span>\\({\\tau }^{2}\\)</span> = .28) using a random-effects model. In order of strongest to weakest effects, at-risk learners (<i>d</i> = 1.38), students with LD (<i>d</i> = 1.15), students with ID (<i>d</i> = .76), and students without disability (<i>d</i> = .52). Among student variables, there is no statistically significant difference by school level, but by school type. Among intervention variables, instruction in math (<i>d</i> = 1.43) and Korean (<i>d</i> = .96); cognitive mapping (<i>d</i> = 1.05); 1–19 times, 1–9 weeks, 3–5 times per week; and small-size groups were the most effective intervention conditions. While several variables showed significant subgroup differences, meta-regression analyses revealed that only group size and frequency were significant moderators after controlling for other factors. In summary, intervention using a graphic organizer was more effective for students with disability and at-risk students than it was for students without disability.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":47344,"journal":{"name":"Asia Pacific Education Review","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effects of interventions using graphic organizer in Korea: a meta-analysis\",\"authors\":\"Jechun An,&nbsp;Dong-il Kim\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s12564-024-09965-2\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>This study aimed to evaluate the effects of intervention using graphic organizers on the cognitive and affective improvement of students with intellectual disability (ID), with learning disability (LD), without disability, and at-risk learners in Korea. A total of 49 peer-reviewed journals and dissertations for the last 20 years were included for conducting this meta-analysis. The overall effect size of intervention using a graphic organizer was .78 (<i>d</i>) (95% CI [.63, .94], <span>\\\\({\\\\tau }^{2}\\\\)</span> = .28) using a random-effects model. In order of strongest to weakest effects, at-risk learners (<i>d</i> = 1.38), students with LD (<i>d</i> = 1.15), students with ID (<i>d</i> = .76), and students without disability (<i>d</i> = .52). Among student variables, there is no statistically significant difference by school level, but by school type. Among intervention variables, instruction in math (<i>d</i> = 1.43) and Korean (<i>d</i> = .96); cognitive mapping (<i>d</i> = 1.05); 1–19 times, 1–9 weeks, 3–5 times per week; and small-size groups were the most effective intervention conditions. While several variables showed significant subgroup differences, meta-regression analyses revealed that only group size and frequency were significant moderators after controlling for other factors. In summary, intervention using a graphic organizer was more effective for students with disability and at-risk students than it was for students without disability.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47344,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Asia Pacific Education Review\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Asia Pacific Education Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"95\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12564-024-09965-2\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"教育学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asia Pacific Education Review","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12564-024-09965-2","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究旨在评估使用图形组织器进行干预对韩国智障(ID)学生、学习障碍(LD)学生、非残疾学生和高危学习者的认知和情感改善的影响。本次荟萃分析共收录了过去 20 年中 49 篇经同行评审的期刊和论文。采用随机效应模型,使用图形组织器进行干预的总体效应大小为 0.78 (d) (95% CI [.63, .94], \({\tau }^{2}\) = 0.28)。从效果最强到效果最弱依次为问题学生(d = 1.38)、有学习障碍的学生(d = 1.15)、智障学生(d = .76)和非残疾学生(d = .52)。在学生变量中,不同学校水平的差异不显著,但不同学校类型的差异显著。在干预变量中,数学(d = 1.43)和韩语(d = 0.96)教学、认知绘图(d = 1.05)、1-19 次、1-9 周、每周 3-5 次以及小规模小组是最有效的干预条件。虽然有几个变量显示出明显的亚组差异,但元回归分析表明,在控制了其他因素后,只有小组规模和频率是明显的调节因素。总之,使用图形组织器进行干预对残疾学生和高危学生比对非残疾学生更有效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Effects of interventions using graphic organizer in Korea: a meta-analysis

Effects of interventions using graphic organizer in Korea: a meta-analysis

Effects of interventions using graphic organizer in Korea: a meta-analysis

This study aimed to evaluate the effects of intervention using graphic organizers on the cognitive and affective improvement of students with intellectual disability (ID), with learning disability (LD), without disability, and at-risk learners in Korea. A total of 49 peer-reviewed journals and dissertations for the last 20 years were included for conducting this meta-analysis. The overall effect size of intervention using a graphic organizer was .78 (d) (95% CI [.63, .94], \({\tau }^{2}\) = .28) using a random-effects model. In order of strongest to weakest effects, at-risk learners (d = 1.38), students with LD (d = 1.15), students with ID (d = .76), and students without disability (d = .52). Among student variables, there is no statistically significant difference by school level, but by school type. Among intervention variables, instruction in math (d = 1.43) and Korean (d = .96); cognitive mapping (d = 1.05); 1–19 times, 1–9 weeks, 3–5 times per week; and small-size groups were the most effective intervention conditions. While several variables showed significant subgroup differences, meta-regression analyses revealed that only group size and frequency were significant moderators after controlling for other factors. In summary, intervention using a graphic organizer was more effective for students with disability and at-risk students than it was for students without disability.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Asia Pacific Education Review
Asia Pacific Education Review EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
4.30%
发文量
64
期刊介绍: The Asia Pacific Education Review (APER) aims to stimulate research, encourage academic exchange, and enhance the professional development of scholars and other researchers who are interested in educational and cultural issues in the Asia Pacific region. APER covers all areas of educational research, with a focus on cross-cultural, comparative and other studies with a broad Asia-Pacific context. APER is a peer reviewed journal produced by the Education Research Institute at Seoul National University. It was founded by the Institute of Asia Pacific Education Development, Seoul National University in 2000, which is owned and operated by Education Research Institute at Seoul National University since 2003. APER requires all submitted manuscripts to follow the seventh edition of the Publication Manual of the American Psychological Association (APA; http://www.apastyle.org/index.aspx).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信