重新审视 Macintosh 型视频喉镜在择期手术患者气管插管中的应用:对 2022 年 Cochrane 综述数据的子分析。

IF 2.6 Q1 SURGERY
Alistair F McNarry, Patrick Ward, Ubong Silas, Rhodri Saunders, Sita J Saunders
{"title":"重新审视 Macintosh 型视频喉镜在择期手术患者气管插管中的应用:对 2022 年 Cochrane 综述数据的子分析。","authors":"Alistair F McNarry, Patrick Ward, Ubong Silas, Rhodri Saunders, Sita J Saunders","doi":"10.1186/s13037-024-00402-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The Cochrane systematic review and meta-analysis published in 2022 that compared videolaryngoscopy (VL) with direct laryngoscopy (DL) for facilitating tracheal intubation in adults found that all three types of VL device (Macintosh-style, hyper-angulated and channeled) reduced the risk of failed intubation and increased the likelihood of first-pass success. We report the findings of a subgroup re-analysis of the 2022 Cochrane meta-analysis data focusing on the Macintosh-style VL group. This was undertaken to establish whether sufficient evidence exists to guide airway managers in making purchasing decisions for their local institutions based upon individual device-specific performance. This re-analysis confirmed the superiority of Macintosh-style VL over Macintosh DL in elective surgical patients, with similar efficacy demonstrated between the Macintosh-style VL devices examined. Thus, when selecting which VL device(s) to purchase for their hospital, airway managers decisions are likely to remain focused upon issues such as financial costs, portability, cleaning schedules and previous device experience.</p>","PeriodicalId":46782,"journal":{"name":"Patient Safety in Surgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11134739/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Macintosh-style videolaryngoscope use for tracheal intubation in elective surgical patients revisited: a sub-analysis of the 2022 Cochrane review data.\",\"authors\":\"Alistair F McNarry, Patrick Ward, Ubong Silas, Rhodri Saunders, Sita J Saunders\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s13037-024-00402-2\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The Cochrane systematic review and meta-analysis published in 2022 that compared videolaryngoscopy (VL) with direct laryngoscopy (DL) for facilitating tracheal intubation in adults found that all three types of VL device (Macintosh-style, hyper-angulated and channeled) reduced the risk of failed intubation and increased the likelihood of first-pass success. We report the findings of a subgroup re-analysis of the 2022 Cochrane meta-analysis data focusing on the Macintosh-style VL group. This was undertaken to establish whether sufficient evidence exists to guide airway managers in making purchasing decisions for their local institutions based upon individual device-specific performance. This re-analysis confirmed the superiority of Macintosh-style VL over Macintosh DL in elective surgical patients, with similar efficacy demonstrated between the Macintosh-style VL devices examined. Thus, when selecting which VL device(s) to purchase for their hospital, airway managers decisions are likely to remain focused upon issues such as financial costs, portability, cleaning schedules and previous device experience.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":46782,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Patient Safety in Surgery\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11134739/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Patient Safety in Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13037-024-00402-2\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Patient Safety in Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13037-024-00402-2","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

2022 年发表的 Cochrane 系统综述和荟萃分析比较了用于成人气管插管的视频喉镜(VL)和直接喉镜(DL),结果发现所有三种类型的 VL 装置(Macintosh 式、超切线式和通道式)都能降低插管失败的风险,并提高首次插管成功的可能性。我们报告了 2022 年 Cochrane 荟萃分析数据的分组再分析结果,重点是 Macintosh 式 VL 组。进行这项分析的目的是为了确定是否有足够的证据指导气道管理人员根据单个设备的具体性能为当地机构做出采购决定。这项重新分析证实,在择期手术患者中,麦金托什式 VL 比麦金托什 DL 更具优势,所研究的麦金托什式 VL 设备之间的疗效相似。因此,气道管理者在为医院选择购买哪种 VL 设备时,可能会继续关注经济成本、便携性、清洁时间和以往的设备使用经验等问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Macintosh-style videolaryngoscope use for tracheal intubation in elective surgical patients revisited: a sub-analysis of the 2022 Cochrane review data.

The Cochrane systematic review and meta-analysis published in 2022 that compared videolaryngoscopy (VL) with direct laryngoscopy (DL) for facilitating tracheal intubation in adults found that all three types of VL device (Macintosh-style, hyper-angulated and channeled) reduced the risk of failed intubation and increased the likelihood of first-pass success. We report the findings of a subgroup re-analysis of the 2022 Cochrane meta-analysis data focusing on the Macintosh-style VL group. This was undertaken to establish whether sufficient evidence exists to guide airway managers in making purchasing decisions for their local institutions based upon individual device-specific performance. This re-analysis confirmed the superiority of Macintosh-style VL over Macintosh DL in elective surgical patients, with similar efficacy demonstrated between the Macintosh-style VL devices examined. Thus, when selecting which VL device(s) to purchase for their hospital, airway managers decisions are likely to remain focused upon issues such as financial costs, portability, cleaning schedules and previous device experience.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.80
自引率
8.10%
发文量
37
审稿时长
9 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信