土地所有者与公民之间的景观价值交易在减少风力发电造成的景观破坏方面的可行性

IF 0.7 4区 农林科学 Q3 ECONOMICS
Erkki Mäntymaa, Katja Kangas, Jouni Karhu, Eija Pouta
{"title":"土地所有者与公民之间的景观价值交易在减少风力发电造成的景观破坏方面的可行性","authors":"Erkki Mäntymaa, Katja Kangas, Jouni Karhu, Eija Pouta","doi":"10.1561/112.00000575","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>A mechanism of payment for ecosystem services (PES) to implement\nlandscape value trade may partly address the visual disturbance\ncaused by wind turbines by encouraging forest owners to change\ntheir forest management practices near housing areas close to\nwind farms. Here, we analyze the feasibility of implementing this\nmechanism in the case of landscape shields reducing the visual\nimpacts of wind power using previous results and data on citizen\nand forest owner preferences. We evaluate the feasibility at various\nspatial scales. The results demonstrate that at the county level,\nwillingness to pay (WTP) exceeds willingness to accept (WTA)\ncompensation. Finally, if a PES mechanism is site-specific, its\nfeasibility depends on how the demand for and supply of the\nservice meet at the narrowest geographical level. In our study, the\nprobability of agreement was low at the wind farm level (2%) but\nhigher at the landscape shield level (41%).</p>","PeriodicalId":54831,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Forest Economics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Feasibility of Landscape Value Trade between Landowners and Citizens in Reducing the Landscape Damage Caused by Wind Power\",\"authors\":\"Erkki Mäntymaa, Katja Kangas, Jouni Karhu, Eija Pouta\",\"doi\":\"10.1561/112.00000575\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>A mechanism of payment for ecosystem services (PES) to implement\\nlandscape value trade may partly address the visual disturbance\\ncaused by wind turbines by encouraging forest owners to change\\ntheir forest management practices near housing areas close to\\nwind farms. Here, we analyze the feasibility of implementing this\\nmechanism in the case of landscape shields reducing the visual\\nimpacts of wind power using previous results and data on citizen\\nand forest owner preferences. We evaluate the feasibility at various\\nspatial scales. The results demonstrate that at the county level,\\nwillingness to pay (WTP) exceeds willingness to accept (WTA)\\ncompensation. Finally, if a PES mechanism is site-specific, its\\nfeasibility depends on how the demand for and supply of the\\nservice meet at the narrowest geographical level. In our study, the\\nprobability of agreement was low at the wind farm level (2%) but\\nhigher at the landscape shield level (41%).</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54831,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Forest Economics\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Forest Economics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1561/112.00000575\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ECONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Forest Economics","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1561/112.00000575","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

通过生态系统服务付费(PES)机制来实施景观价值交易,可以部分解决风力涡轮机造成的视觉干扰问题,鼓励森林所有者改变靠近风力发电场的住宅区附近的森林管理方法。在此,我们利用先前的研究结果以及公民和森林所有者偏好方面的数据,分析了在减少风电视觉影响的景观屏蔽案例中实施该机制的可行性。我们评估了不同空间尺度下的可行性。结果表明,在县一级,支付意愿(WTP)超过了接受补偿的意愿(WTA)。最后,如果生态系统服务补偿机制是因地制宜的,那么其可行性就取决于在最狭窄的地理范围内,服务的需求和供给是如何满足的。在我们的研究中,在风电场层面达成一致的概率较低(2%),但在景观屏蔽层面达成一致的概率较高(41%)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Feasibility of Landscape Value Trade between Landowners and Citizens in Reducing the Landscape Damage Caused by Wind Power

A mechanism of payment for ecosystem services (PES) to implement landscape value trade may partly address the visual disturbance caused by wind turbines by encouraging forest owners to change their forest management practices near housing areas close to wind farms. Here, we analyze the feasibility of implementing this mechanism in the case of landscape shields reducing the visual impacts of wind power using previous results and data on citizen and forest owner preferences. We evaluate the feasibility at various spatial scales. The results demonstrate that at the county level, willingness to pay (WTP) exceeds willingness to accept (WTA) compensation. Finally, if a PES mechanism is site-specific, its feasibility depends on how the demand for and supply of the service meet at the narrowest geographical level. In our study, the probability of agreement was low at the wind farm level (2%) but higher at the landscape shield level (41%).

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Forest Economics
Journal of Forest Economics 农林科学-林学
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
16
审稿时长
>36 weeks
期刊介绍: The journal covers all aspects of forest economics, and publishes scientific papers in subject areas such as the following: forest management problems: economics of silviculture, forest regulation and operational activities, managerial economics; forest industry analysis: economics of processing, industrial organization problems, demand and supply analysis, technological change, international trade of forest products; multiple use of forests: valuation of non-market priced goods and services, cost-benefit analysis of environment and timber production, external effects of forestry and forest industry; forest policy analysis: market and intervention failures, regulation of forest management, ownership, taxation; land use and economic development: deforestation and land use problem, national resource accounting, contribution to national and regional income and employment. forestry and climate change: using forestry to mitigate climate change, economic analysis of bioenergy, adaption of forestry to climate change.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信