波斯中世纪手稿中使用的上浆材料的特性：物理、光学、光谱成像和杀菌特性

IF 0.8 4区化学 0 ARCHAEOLOGY

Studies in Conservation Pub Date : 2024-05-25 DOI:10.1080/00393630.2024.2342647

Mandana Barkeshli, Ina Stephen, Ivan Shevchuk, Mojtaba Soltani

引用次数: 0

摘要

在这项研究中，我们调查了帖木儿王朝（十五世纪）、萨非王朝（十六世纪）和卡扎尔王朝（十九世纪）期间伊朗纸质手稿中用于上浆的各种材料。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Characteristics of Sizing Materials Used in Persian Medieval Manuscripts: Physical, Optical, Spectral Imaging, and Fungicidal Properties

In this study, we investigated the diverse range of materials used for sizing in Iranian paper manuscripts during the Timurid (fifteenth century) to Safavid (sixteenth century) and Qajar (nineteent...

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Studies in Conservation 化学-分析化学

CiteScore

1.80

自引率

12.50%

发文量

审稿时长

>12 weeks

期刊介绍： Studies in Conservation is the premier international peer-reviewed journal for the conservation of historic and artistic works. The intended readership includes the conservation professional in the broadest sense of the term: practising conservators of all types of object, conservation, heritage and museum scientists, collection or conservation managers, teachers and students of conservation, and academic researchers in the subject areas of arts, archaeology, the built heritage, materials history, art technological research and material culture. Studies in Conservation publishes original work on a range of subjects including, but not limited to, examination methods for works of art, new research in the analysis of artistic materials, mechanisms of deterioration, advances in conservation practice, novel methods of treatment, conservation issues in display and storage, preventive conservation, issues of collection care, conservation history and ethics, and the history of materials and technological processes. Scientific content is not necessary, and the editors encourage the submission of practical articles, review papers, position papers on best practice and the philosophy and ethics of collecting and preservation, to help maintain the traditional balance of the journal. Whatever the subject matter, accounts of routine procedures are not accepted, except where these lead to results that are sufficiently novel and/or significant to be of general interest.