官方和协作地理空间数据的语义统一:巴西案例研究

Q4 Social Sciences
Adriana Alexandria Machado, S. Camboim
{"title":"官方和协作地理空间数据的语义统一:巴西案例研究","authors":"Adriana Alexandria Machado, S. Camboim","doi":"10.14393/rbcv76n0a-72070","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Geospatial data is crucial for sustainable development, but obtaining up-to-date and high-quality data is challenging in many regions, including Brazil. Collaborative mapping on platforms such as OpenStreetMap (OSM) has produced updated and open geospatial data, especially in urban areas, but its quality is heterogeneous. In addition, semantic interoperability is challenging when integrating OSM data with authoritative geospatial data. This article presents a procedure for semantic alignment between two conceptual models within a conflation process to elicit background knowledge for geospatial data integration. The first model is the Technical Specification for Structuring Vector Geospatial Data (ET-EDGV 3.0) in Brazilian Portuguese, and the second is the OSM model with tags mainly in English. The alignment produced a table combining the ET-EDGV classes, attributes, domains, and geometries with the OSM tags and elements. The semantic alignment was tested in two study areas to check the thematic accuracy of transportation data imported from OSM compared to the data in the reference database. The study found that the best percentage of segments correctly classified by alignment was for \"highway=trunk\" tags (98.27%) and \"highway=primary\" (98.20%), corresponding to road and highway segments, and for the \"highway=residential\" tag (76.20%), corresponding to sections of residential streets. The study also identified factors that may contribute to low accuracy rates, including ambiguous semantic descriptions and the need for local context analysis. This research contributes to adding collaborative data to the official mapping, a relevant alternative for updating and supplementing reference mapping that can be applied in other geographical contexts.","PeriodicalId":36183,"journal":{"name":"Revista Brasileira de Cartografia","volume":" 35","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Semantic Alignment of Official and Collaborative Geospatial Data: A Case Study in Brazil\",\"authors\":\"Adriana Alexandria Machado, S. Camboim\",\"doi\":\"10.14393/rbcv76n0a-72070\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Geospatial data is crucial for sustainable development, but obtaining up-to-date and high-quality data is challenging in many regions, including Brazil. Collaborative mapping on platforms such as OpenStreetMap (OSM) has produced updated and open geospatial data, especially in urban areas, but its quality is heterogeneous. In addition, semantic interoperability is challenging when integrating OSM data with authoritative geospatial data. This article presents a procedure for semantic alignment between two conceptual models within a conflation process to elicit background knowledge for geospatial data integration. The first model is the Technical Specification for Structuring Vector Geospatial Data (ET-EDGV 3.0) in Brazilian Portuguese, and the second is the OSM model with tags mainly in English. The alignment produced a table combining the ET-EDGV classes, attributes, domains, and geometries with the OSM tags and elements. The semantic alignment was tested in two study areas to check the thematic accuracy of transportation data imported from OSM compared to the data in the reference database. The study found that the best percentage of segments correctly classified by alignment was for \\\"highway=trunk\\\" tags (98.27%) and \\\"highway=primary\\\" (98.20%), corresponding to road and highway segments, and for the \\\"highway=residential\\\" tag (76.20%), corresponding to sections of residential streets. The study also identified factors that may contribute to low accuracy rates, including ambiguous semantic descriptions and the need for local context analysis. This research contributes to adding collaborative data to the official mapping, a relevant alternative for updating and supplementing reference mapping that can be applied in other geographical contexts.\",\"PeriodicalId\":36183,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Revista Brasileira de Cartografia\",\"volume\":\" 35\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Revista Brasileira de Cartografia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.14393/rbcv76n0a-72070\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista Brasileira de Cartografia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14393/rbcv76n0a-72070","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

地理空间数据对可持续发展至关重要,但在包括巴西在内的许多地区,获取最新和高质量的数据具有挑战性。OpenStreetMap (OSM) 等平台上的协作制图产生了最新、开放的地理空间数据,尤其是在城市地区,但其质量参差不齐。此外,在将 OSM 数据与权威地理空间数据整合时,语义互操作性也面临挑战。本文介绍了一种在混淆过程中对两个概念模型进行语义对齐的程序,以获取地理空间数据完整性的背景知识。第一个模型是巴西葡萄牙语的《矢量地理空间数据结构化技术规范》(ET-EDGV 3.0),第二个模型是 OSM 模型,其标签主要是英语。对齐后生成的表格将 ET-EDGV 类、属性、域和几何图形与 OSM 标签和元素结合在一起。在两个研究区域对语义配准进行了测试,以检查从 OSM 导入的交通数据与参考数据库中的数据相比在主题方面的准确性。研究发现,"highway=trunk "标签(98.27%)和 "highway=primary "标签(98.20%)(对应公路和高速公路路段)以及 "highway=residential "标签(76.20%)(对应住宅街道路段)的对齐分类正确率最高。研究还发现了可能导致准确率低的因素,包括语义描述模糊和需要进行本地上下文分析。这项研究有助于将协作数据添加到官方制图中,这是更新和补充参考制图的一种相关替代方法,可应用于其他地理环境。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Semantic Alignment of Official and Collaborative Geospatial Data: A Case Study in Brazil
Geospatial data is crucial for sustainable development, but obtaining up-to-date and high-quality data is challenging in many regions, including Brazil. Collaborative mapping on platforms such as OpenStreetMap (OSM) has produced updated and open geospatial data, especially in urban areas, but its quality is heterogeneous. In addition, semantic interoperability is challenging when integrating OSM data with authoritative geospatial data. This article presents a procedure for semantic alignment between two conceptual models within a conflation process to elicit background knowledge for geospatial data integration. The first model is the Technical Specification for Structuring Vector Geospatial Data (ET-EDGV 3.0) in Brazilian Portuguese, and the second is the OSM model with tags mainly in English. The alignment produced a table combining the ET-EDGV classes, attributes, domains, and geometries with the OSM tags and elements. The semantic alignment was tested in two study areas to check the thematic accuracy of transportation data imported from OSM compared to the data in the reference database. The study found that the best percentage of segments correctly classified by alignment was for "highway=trunk" tags (98.27%) and "highway=primary" (98.20%), corresponding to road and highway segments, and for the "highway=residential" tag (76.20%), corresponding to sections of residential streets. The study also identified factors that may contribute to low accuracy rates, including ambiguous semantic descriptions and the need for local context analysis. This research contributes to adding collaborative data to the official mapping, a relevant alternative for updating and supplementing reference mapping that can be applied in other geographical contexts.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Revista Brasileira de Cartografia
Revista Brasileira de Cartografia Earth and Planetary Sciences-Earth-Surface Processes
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
37
审稿时长
16 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信