转移性黑色素瘤患者体内循环肿瘤细胞和游离 DNA 的综合特征。

IF 6.6 2区 医学 Q1 Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
Molecular Oncology Pub Date : 2024-11-01 Epub Date: 2024-05-24 DOI:10.1002/1878-0261.13650
Manouk K Bos, Jaco Kraan, Martijn P A Starmans, Jean C A Helmijr, Noortje Verschoor, Maja J A De Jonge, Arjen Joosse, Astrid A M van der Veldt, Peter A W Te Boekhorst, John W M Martens, Stefan Sleijfer, Saskia M Wilting
{"title":"转移性黑色素瘤患者体内循环肿瘤细胞和游离 DNA 的综合特征。","authors":"Manouk K Bos, Jaco Kraan, Martijn P A Starmans, Jean C A Helmijr, Noortje Verschoor, Maja J A De Jonge, Arjen Joosse, Astrid A M van der Veldt, Peter A W Te Boekhorst, John W M Martens, Stefan Sleijfer, Saskia M Wilting","doi":"10.1002/1878-0261.13650","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Advances in therapeutic approaches for melanoma urge the need for biomarkers that can identify patients at risk for recurrence and to guide treatment. The potential use of liquid biopsies in identifying biomarkers is increasingly being recognized. Here, we present a head-to-head comparison of several techniques to analyze circulating tumor cells (CTCs) and cell-free DNA (cfDNA) in 20 patients with metastatic melanoma. In this study, we investigated whether diagnostic leukapheresis (DLA) combined with multimarker flow cytometry (FCM) increased the detection of CTCs in blood compared to the CellSearch platform. Additionally, we characterized cfDNA at the level of somatic mutations, extent of aneuploidy and genome-wide DNA methylation. Both CTCs and cfDNA measures were compared to tumor markers and extracranial tumor burden on radiological imaging. Compared to the CellSearch method applied on peripheral blood, DLA combined with FCM increased the proportion of patients with detectable CTCs from 35% to 70% (P = 0.06). However, the median percentage of cells that could be recovered by the DLA procedure was 29%. Alternatively, cfDNA mutation and methylation analysis detected tumor load in the majority of patients (90% and 93% of samples successfully analyzed, respectively). The aneuploidy score was positive in 35% of all patients. From all tumor measurements in blood, lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) levels were significantly correlated to variant allele frequency (P = 0.004). Furthermore, the presence of CTCs in DLA was associated with tumor burden (P < 0.001), whereas the presence of CTCs in peripheral blood was associated with number of lesions on radiological imaging (P < 0.001). In conclusion, DLA tended to increase the proportion of patients with detectable CTCs but was also associated with low recovery. Both cfDNA and CTCs were correlated with clinical parameters such as LDH levels and extracranial tumor burden.</p>","PeriodicalId":18764,"journal":{"name":"Molecular Oncology","volume":" ","pages":"2770-2782"},"PeriodicalIF":6.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11547238/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comprehensive characterization of circulating tumor cells and cell-free DNA in patients with metastatic melanoma.\",\"authors\":\"Manouk K Bos, Jaco Kraan, Martijn P A Starmans, Jean C A Helmijr, Noortje Verschoor, Maja J A De Jonge, Arjen Joosse, Astrid A M van der Veldt, Peter A W Te Boekhorst, John W M Martens, Stefan Sleijfer, Saskia M Wilting\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/1878-0261.13650\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Advances in therapeutic approaches for melanoma urge the need for biomarkers that can identify patients at risk for recurrence and to guide treatment. The potential use of liquid biopsies in identifying biomarkers is increasingly being recognized. Here, we present a head-to-head comparison of several techniques to analyze circulating tumor cells (CTCs) and cell-free DNA (cfDNA) in 20 patients with metastatic melanoma. In this study, we investigated whether diagnostic leukapheresis (DLA) combined with multimarker flow cytometry (FCM) increased the detection of CTCs in blood compared to the CellSearch platform. Additionally, we characterized cfDNA at the level of somatic mutations, extent of aneuploidy and genome-wide DNA methylation. Both CTCs and cfDNA measures were compared to tumor markers and extracranial tumor burden on radiological imaging. Compared to the CellSearch method applied on peripheral blood, DLA combined with FCM increased the proportion of patients with detectable CTCs from 35% to 70% (P = 0.06). However, the median percentage of cells that could be recovered by the DLA procedure was 29%. Alternatively, cfDNA mutation and methylation analysis detected tumor load in the majority of patients (90% and 93% of samples successfully analyzed, respectively). The aneuploidy score was positive in 35% of all patients. From all tumor measurements in blood, lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) levels were significantly correlated to variant allele frequency (P = 0.004). Furthermore, the presence of CTCs in DLA was associated with tumor burden (P < 0.001), whereas the presence of CTCs in peripheral blood was associated with number of lesions on radiological imaging (P < 0.001). In conclusion, DLA tended to increase the proportion of patients with detectable CTCs but was also associated with low recovery. Both cfDNA and CTCs were correlated with clinical parameters such as LDH levels and extracranial tumor burden.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":18764,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Molecular Oncology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"2770-2782\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11547238/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Molecular Oncology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/1878-0261.13650\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/5/24 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Molecular Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/1878-0261.13650","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/5/24 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

黑色素瘤治疗方法的进步促使人们需要生物标志物来识别有复发风险的患者并指导治疗。人们越来越认识到液体活检在确定生物标记物方面的潜在用途。在此,我们对 20 名转移性黑色素瘤患者的循环肿瘤细胞(CTC)和无细胞 DNA(cfDNA)分析技术进行了正面比较。在这项研究中,我们研究了诊断性白血球穿刺术(DLA)结合多标记流式细胞术(FCM)与 CellSearch 平台相比是否能提高血液中 CTC 的检测率。此外,我们还在体细胞突变、非整倍体程度和全基因组 DNA 甲基化水平上对 cfDNA 进行了鉴定。我们将 CTCs 和 cfDNA 的测量结果与肿瘤标志物和放射成像上的颅外肿瘤负荷进行了比较。与应用于外周血的 CellSearch 方法相比,DLA 结合 FCM 可将可检测到 CTCs 的患者比例从 35% 提高到 70%(P = 0.06)。不过,DLA 程序可回收细胞的中位比例为 29%。另外,cfDNA突变和甲基化分析在大多数患者中检测到了肿瘤负荷(分别占成功分析样本的90%和93%)。35%的患者的非整倍体评分呈阳性。从血液中的所有肿瘤测量结果来看,乳酸脱氢酶(LDH)水平与变异等位基因频率显著相关(P = 0.004)。此外,DLA 中 CTC 的存在与肿瘤负荷相关(P = 0.004)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comprehensive characterization of circulating tumor cells and cell-free DNA in patients with metastatic melanoma.

Advances in therapeutic approaches for melanoma urge the need for biomarkers that can identify patients at risk for recurrence and to guide treatment. The potential use of liquid biopsies in identifying biomarkers is increasingly being recognized. Here, we present a head-to-head comparison of several techniques to analyze circulating tumor cells (CTCs) and cell-free DNA (cfDNA) in 20 patients with metastatic melanoma. In this study, we investigated whether diagnostic leukapheresis (DLA) combined with multimarker flow cytometry (FCM) increased the detection of CTCs in blood compared to the CellSearch platform. Additionally, we characterized cfDNA at the level of somatic mutations, extent of aneuploidy and genome-wide DNA methylation. Both CTCs and cfDNA measures were compared to tumor markers and extracranial tumor burden on radiological imaging. Compared to the CellSearch method applied on peripheral blood, DLA combined with FCM increased the proportion of patients with detectable CTCs from 35% to 70% (P = 0.06). However, the median percentage of cells that could be recovered by the DLA procedure was 29%. Alternatively, cfDNA mutation and methylation analysis detected tumor load in the majority of patients (90% and 93% of samples successfully analyzed, respectively). The aneuploidy score was positive in 35% of all patients. From all tumor measurements in blood, lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) levels were significantly correlated to variant allele frequency (P = 0.004). Furthermore, the presence of CTCs in DLA was associated with tumor burden (P < 0.001), whereas the presence of CTCs in peripheral blood was associated with number of lesions on radiological imaging (P < 0.001). In conclusion, DLA tended to increase the proportion of patients with detectable CTCs but was also associated with low recovery. Both cfDNA and CTCs were correlated with clinical parameters such as LDH levels and extracranial tumor burden.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Molecular Oncology
Molecular Oncology Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology-Molecular Medicine
CiteScore
11.80
自引率
1.50%
发文量
203
审稿时长
10 weeks
期刊介绍: Molecular Oncology highlights new discoveries, approaches, and technical developments, in basic, clinical and discovery-driven translational cancer research. It publishes research articles, reviews (by invitation only), and timely science policy articles. The journal is now fully Open Access with all articles published over the past 10 years freely available.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信