评估脑卒中后遗症患者反应能力的表现结果工具的心理计量特性:系统综述

Q3 Medicine
M. Valdez , C. Bartolini , G. Candoni , F. Scaminaci-Russo , R. Tomadín , A. Mendelevich
{"title":"评估脑卒中后遗症患者反应能力的表现结果工具的心理计量特性:系统综述","authors":"M. Valdez ,&nbsp;C. Bartolini ,&nbsp;G. Candoni ,&nbsp;F. Scaminaci-Russo ,&nbsp;R. Tomadín ,&nbsp;A. Mendelevich","doi":"10.1016/j.rh.2024.100855","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The objective was to perform a systematic review of those performance outcomes (HRD) tools that assess sensitivity in post-stroke subjects, as well as to know which of all is the most reliable and viable. The design was a systematic review. The following were included: HRD, developed in post-stroke subjects, of any etiology and period of evolution; 18 years of age or older and testing for sensitivity; results on psychometric properties. Excluded: self-reported results, the report of cross-cultural adaptation, designed through computerized means. 19 HRD were acquired. The psychometric properties analyzed were reliability, internal consistency, measurement error, construct validity, content validity, and sensitivity to change, the first being the most studied. Psychometric properties were identified, assessed, compared, and summarized. Of all of them, we recommend the use of the modified Erasmus Nottingham Sensory Assessment, as it presents the best degree of confidence in the evidence.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":39532,"journal":{"name":"Rehabilitacion","volume":"58 3","pages":"Article 100855"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Propiedades psicométricas de herramientas de resultados de desempeño para evaluar la sensibilidad en sujetos con secuela de accidente cerebrovascular: revisión sistemática\",\"authors\":\"M. Valdez ,&nbsp;C. Bartolini ,&nbsp;G. Candoni ,&nbsp;F. Scaminaci-Russo ,&nbsp;R. Tomadín ,&nbsp;A. Mendelevich\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.rh.2024.100855\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>The objective was to perform a systematic review of those performance outcomes (HRD) tools that assess sensitivity in post-stroke subjects, as well as to know which of all is the most reliable and viable. The design was a systematic review. The following were included: HRD, developed in post-stroke subjects, of any etiology and period of evolution; 18 years of age or older and testing for sensitivity; results on psychometric properties. Excluded: self-reported results, the report of cross-cultural adaptation, designed through computerized means. 19 HRD were acquired. The psychometric properties analyzed were reliability, internal consistency, measurement error, construct validity, content validity, and sensitivity to change, the first being the most studied. Psychometric properties were identified, assessed, compared, and summarized. Of all of them, we recommend the use of the modified Erasmus Nottingham Sensory Assessment, as it presents the best degree of confidence in the evidence.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":39532,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Rehabilitacion\",\"volume\":\"58 3\",\"pages\":\"Article 100855\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Rehabilitacion\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0048712024000197\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Rehabilitacion","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0048712024000197","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

这项研究的目的是对评估中风后受试者灵敏度的绩效结果(HRD)工具进行系统回顾,并了解其中哪种工具最可靠、最可行。该研究采用了系统性回顾的设计。其中包括针对中风后受试者开发的 HRD,病因和演变时期不限;年龄在 18 岁或以上,测试敏感性;心理测量学特性结果。不包括:自我报告的结果、跨文化适应报告、通过计算机化手段设计的结果。获得了 19 项人力资源开发结果。分析的心理测量特性包括信度、内部一致性、测量误差、结构效度、内容效度和对变化的敏感度,其中对第一项特性的研究最多。我们对心理测量特性进行了识别、评估、比较和总结。在所有这些特性中,我们推荐使用修改后的伊拉斯谟-诺丁汉感官评估,因为它提供的证据可信度最高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Propiedades psicométricas de herramientas de resultados de desempeño para evaluar la sensibilidad en sujetos con secuela de accidente cerebrovascular: revisión sistemática

The objective was to perform a systematic review of those performance outcomes (HRD) tools that assess sensitivity in post-stroke subjects, as well as to know which of all is the most reliable and viable. The design was a systematic review. The following were included: HRD, developed in post-stroke subjects, of any etiology and period of evolution; 18 years of age or older and testing for sensitivity; results on psychometric properties. Excluded: self-reported results, the report of cross-cultural adaptation, designed through computerized means. 19 HRD were acquired. The psychometric properties analyzed were reliability, internal consistency, measurement error, construct validity, content validity, and sensitivity to change, the first being the most studied. Psychometric properties were identified, assessed, compared, and summarized. Of all of them, we recommend the use of the modified Erasmus Nottingham Sensory Assessment, as it presents the best degree of confidence in the evidence.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Rehabilitacion
Rehabilitacion Medicine-Rehabilitation
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
63
期刊介绍: La revista que es desde hace más de 40 años la publicación oficial de la Sociedad Española de Rehabilitación y referente de la mayoría de las Sociedades de la Especialidad de los países americanos de habla hispana. Se publican 5 números pluritemáticos al año y uno monográfico sobre un tema del mayor interés y actualidad designado por el consejo de redacción.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信