西班牙文版智利常规临床评估结果测量(CORE-OM)的心理计量特性。

IF 2.6 1区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL
Antonia Errázuriz, Alvaro Passi Solar, Rodrigo Beltrán, Clara Paz, Chris Evans, Guillermo De la Parra
{"title":"西班牙文版智利常规临床评估结果测量(CORE-OM)的心理计量特性。","authors":"Antonia Errázuriz, Alvaro Passi Solar, Rodrigo Beltrán, Clara Paz, Chris Evans, Guillermo De la Parra","doi":"10.1080/10503307.2024.2356195","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To examine the psychometric properties of the Spanish version of the 34-item Clinical Outcomes in Routine Evaluation-Outcome Measure questionnaire (CORE-OM).</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Psychometric exploration was conducted in two samples: non-clinical (<i>n</i> = 706) and clinical (<i>n</i> = 420) participants. The non-clinical sample comprised a subgroup of community members (<i>n</i> = 308) and students (<i>n</i> = 398). The clinical sample consisted of self-reported patients (<i>n</i> = 209) and outpatients (<i>n</i> = 211). The analysis included both internal and test-retest reliability, convergent validity, and principal component analysis. A reliable change index and clinical cut-off scores were established for assessing clinically significant change.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The Spanish CORE-OM demonstrated good internal consistency and test-retest reliability, along with satisfactory convergent validity against the 45-item Outcome Questionnaire (OQ-45.2). There were strong differentiations between the clinical and non-clinical samples and the four sample subsets. The outpatient group reported the highest scores, while the community group exhibited the lowest scores. There were no marked gender effects. All observed patterns aligned closely with the established Spanish referential data.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our findings provide support for the utilization of the Spanish CORE-OM as a measure for tracking psychotherapeutic progress in the context of Chile.</p>","PeriodicalId":48159,"journal":{"name":"Psychotherapy Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Psychometric properties of the Spanish version of the Clinical Outcomes in Routine Evaluation Outcome Measure (CORE-OM) in Chile.\",\"authors\":\"Antonia Errázuriz, Alvaro Passi Solar, Rodrigo Beltrán, Clara Paz, Chris Evans, Guillermo De la Parra\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/10503307.2024.2356195\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To examine the psychometric properties of the Spanish version of the 34-item Clinical Outcomes in Routine Evaluation-Outcome Measure questionnaire (CORE-OM).</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Psychometric exploration was conducted in two samples: non-clinical (<i>n</i> = 706) and clinical (<i>n</i> = 420) participants. The non-clinical sample comprised a subgroup of community members (<i>n</i> = 308) and students (<i>n</i> = 398). The clinical sample consisted of self-reported patients (<i>n</i> = 209) and outpatients (<i>n</i> = 211). The analysis included both internal and test-retest reliability, convergent validity, and principal component analysis. A reliable change index and clinical cut-off scores were established for assessing clinically significant change.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The Spanish CORE-OM demonstrated good internal consistency and test-retest reliability, along with satisfactory convergent validity against the 45-item Outcome Questionnaire (OQ-45.2). There were strong differentiations between the clinical and non-clinical samples and the four sample subsets. The outpatient group reported the highest scores, while the community group exhibited the lowest scores. There were no marked gender effects. All observed patterns aligned closely with the established Spanish referential data.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our findings provide support for the utilization of the Spanish CORE-OM as a measure for tracking psychotherapeutic progress in the context of Chile.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48159,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Psychotherapy Research\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Psychotherapy Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/10503307.2024.2356195\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychotherapy Research","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10503307.2024.2356195","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:研究西班牙文版 34 项常规评估临床结果--收入测量问卷(CORE-OM)的心理测量特性:研究西班牙文版 34 项临床常规评估结果--收入测量问卷(CORE-OM)的心理测量特性:在两个样本中进行了心理测试:非临床样本(n = 706)和临床样本(n = 420)。非临床样本包括社区成员(n = 308)和学生(n = 398)。临床样本包括自我报告的患者(n = 209)和门诊患者(n = 211)。分析包括内部和重测信度、收敛效度和主成分分析。建立了可靠的变化指数和临床截断分数,用于评估临床显著变化:结果:西班牙 CORE-OM 显示出良好的内部一致性和重测可靠性,与 45 个项目的结果问卷(OQ-45.2)的收敛效度也令人满意。临床样本和非临床样本以及四个样本子集之间的差异很大。门诊病人组的得分最高,而社区组的得分最低。性别效应不明显。所有观察到的模式都与既定的西班牙参考数据密切吻合:我们的研究结果为在智利使用西班牙 CORE-OM 作为跟踪心理治疗进展的测量方法提供了支持。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Psychometric properties of the Spanish version of the Clinical Outcomes in Routine Evaluation Outcome Measure (CORE-OM) in Chile.

Objective: To examine the psychometric properties of the Spanish version of the 34-item Clinical Outcomes in Routine Evaluation-Outcome Measure questionnaire (CORE-OM).

Method: Psychometric exploration was conducted in two samples: non-clinical (n = 706) and clinical (n = 420) participants. The non-clinical sample comprised a subgroup of community members (n = 308) and students (n = 398). The clinical sample consisted of self-reported patients (n = 209) and outpatients (n = 211). The analysis included both internal and test-retest reliability, convergent validity, and principal component analysis. A reliable change index and clinical cut-off scores were established for assessing clinically significant change.

Results: The Spanish CORE-OM demonstrated good internal consistency and test-retest reliability, along with satisfactory convergent validity against the 45-item Outcome Questionnaire (OQ-45.2). There were strong differentiations between the clinical and non-clinical samples and the four sample subsets. The outpatient group reported the highest scores, while the community group exhibited the lowest scores. There were no marked gender effects. All observed patterns aligned closely with the established Spanish referential data.

Conclusion: Our findings provide support for the utilization of the Spanish CORE-OM as a measure for tracking psychotherapeutic progress in the context of Chile.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Psychotherapy Research
Psychotherapy Research PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL-
CiteScore
7.80
自引率
10.30%
发文量
68
期刊介绍: Psychotherapy Research seeks to enhance the development, scientific quality, and social relevance of psychotherapy research and to foster the use of research findings in practice, education, and policy formulation. The Journal publishes reports of original research on all aspects of psychotherapy, including its outcomes, its processes, education of practitioners, and delivery of services. It also publishes methodological, theoretical, and review articles of direct relevance to psychotherapy research. The Journal is addressed to an international, interdisciplinary audience and welcomes submissions dealing with diverse theoretical orientations, treatment modalities.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信