前瞻性记忆中与交流有关的方面:前瞻性记忆问卷的探索性因素分析。

IF 0.9 Q4 AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY
CoDAS Pub Date : 2024-05-20 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1590/2317-1782/20242023233en
Dasmine Fraclita D'Souza, Gagan Bajaj, Himani Kotian, Sheetal Raj Moolambally, Jayashree S Bhat
{"title":"前瞻性记忆中与交流有关的方面:前瞻性记忆问卷的探索性因素分析。","authors":"Dasmine Fraclita D'Souza, Gagan Bajaj, Himani Kotian, Sheetal Raj Moolambally, Jayashree S Bhat","doi":"10.1590/2317-1782/20242023233en","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Prospective memory (PM) questionnaires are frequently used to evaluate perceptions of PM skills in daily life. This study aimed to systematically investigate communication-specific attributes using pre-existing PM self-rating questionnaires to inform clinicians and researchers about the role of PM in cognitive communicative evaluations.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>PM-related items from three questionnaires (i.e., Prospective Memory Questionnaire, Comprehensive Assessment of Prospective Memory, and Prospective and Retrospective Memory Questionnaire) were compiled and embedded in Google Forms and distributed to 70 Speech-Language Pathologists (SLPs) with expertise in Cognitive Communicative Disorders across India. Participants first identified items related to communication, and were then contacted to rate the communication-related PM items using a Likert scale for their degree of appropriateness. Responses from 40 SLPs were obtained and subjected to item-content validity index (i-CVI) and exploratory factor analysis (EFA).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 114 PM items, 28 received ratings over 50% for their relevance to communication. Of the 28 items, 21 had an i-CVI score greater than 0.8. After the removal of overlapping content, 14 items were finalized and subjected to EFA, which resulted in four factors: PM failure due to loss of communicative content, PM failure due to loss of communicative intent, PM cost due to ongoing interference, and PM failure linked to the priority of communicative intent.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study highlights communication-related aspects of PM that can be used as a framework for SLPs to assess and research PM skills.</p>","PeriodicalId":46547,"journal":{"name":"CoDAS","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11129869/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Communication-related aspects of prospective memory: an exploratory factor analysis of prospective memory questionnaires.\",\"authors\":\"Dasmine Fraclita D'Souza, Gagan Bajaj, Himani Kotian, Sheetal Raj Moolambally, Jayashree S Bhat\",\"doi\":\"10.1590/2317-1782/20242023233en\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Prospective memory (PM) questionnaires are frequently used to evaluate perceptions of PM skills in daily life. This study aimed to systematically investigate communication-specific attributes using pre-existing PM self-rating questionnaires to inform clinicians and researchers about the role of PM in cognitive communicative evaluations.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>PM-related items from three questionnaires (i.e., Prospective Memory Questionnaire, Comprehensive Assessment of Prospective Memory, and Prospective and Retrospective Memory Questionnaire) were compiled and embedded in Google Forms and distributed to 70 Speech-Language Pathologists (SLPs) with expertise in Cognitive Communicative Disorders across India. Participants first identified items related to communication, and were then contacted to rate the communication-related PM items using a Likert scale for their degree of appropriateness. Responses from 40 SLPs were obtained and subjected to item-content validity index (i-CVI) and exploratory factor analysis (EFA).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 114 PM items, 28 received ratings over 50% for their relevance to communication. Of the 28 items, 21 had an i-CVI score greater than 0.8. After the removal of overlapping content, 14 items were finalized and subjected to EFA, which resulted in four factors: PM failure due to loss of communicative content, PM failure due to loss of communicative intent, PM cost due to ongoing interference, and PM failure linked to the priority of communicative intent.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study highlights communication-related aspects of PM that can be used as a framework for SLPs to assess and research PM skills.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":46547,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"CoDAS\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11129869/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"CoDAS\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1590/2317-1782/20242023233en\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"CoDAS","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1590/2317-1782/20242023233en","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:前瞻性记忆(PM)问卷常用于评估日常生活中对PM技能的认知。本研究旨在利用已有的前瞻性记忆自评问卷系统地调查沟通特异性属性,从而为临床医生和研究人员提供有关前瞻性记忆在认知沟通评价中的作用的信息:方法:将三份问卷(即前瞻性记忆问卷、前瞻性记忆综合评估问卷以及前瞻性和回顾性记忆问卷)中与PM相关的项目汇编并嵌入谷歌表格,然后分发给全印度70名具有认知交流障碍专业知识的语言病理学家(SLP)。参与者首先确定了与交流有关的项目,然后与他们取得联系,让他们使用李克特量表对与交流有关的 PM 项目的适当性进行评分。我们获得了 40 名语言康复师的回复,并对回复进行了项目-内容有效性指数(i-CVI)和探索性因子分析(EFA):结果:在 114 个 PM 项目中,28 个项目与沟通的相关性评分超过 50%。在这 28 个项目中,21 个项目的 i-CVI 分值大于 0.8。在去除重叠内容后,最终确定了 14 个项目,并对其进行了 EFA 分析,得出了四个因子:四个因子分别是:沟通内容缺失导致的项目管理失败、沟通意图缺失导致的项目管理失败、持续干扰导致的项目管理成本、沟通意图优先导致的项目管理失败:本研究强调了与交流有关的催眠方面的问题,可作为辅助语言学习者评估和研究催眠技能的框架。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Communication-related aspects of prospective memory: an exploratory factor analysis of prospective memory questionnaires.

Purpose: Prospective memory (PM) questionnaires are frequently used to evaluate perceptions of PM skills in daily life. This study aimed to systematically investigate communication-specific attributes using pre-existing PM self-rating questionnaires to inform clinicians and researchers about the role of PM in cognitive communicative evaluations.

Methods: PM-related items from three questionnaires (i.e., Prospective Memory Questionnaire, Comprehensive Assessment of Prospective Memory, and Prospective and Retrospective Memory Questionnaire) were compiled and embedded in Google Forms and distributed to 70 Speech-Language Pathologists (SLPs) with expertise in Cognitive Communicative Disorders across India. Participants first identified items related to communication, and were then contacted to rate the communication-related PM items using a Likert scale for their degree of appropriateness. Responses from 40 SLPs were obtained and subjected to item-content validity index (i-CVI) and exploratory factor analysis (EFA).

Results: Of the 114 PM items, 28 received ratings over 50% for their relevance to communication. Of the 28 items, 21 had an i-CVI score greater than 0.8. After the removal of overlapping content, 14 items were finalized and subjected to EFA, which resulted in four factors: PM failure due to loss of communicative content, PM failure due to loss of communicative intent, PM cost due to ongoing interference, and PM failure linked to the priority of communicative intent.

Conclusion: This study highlights communication-related aspects of PM that can be used as a framework for SLPs to assess and research PM skills.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CoDAS
CoDAS AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY-
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
12.50%
发文量
103
审稿时长
30 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信