验证用于骨髓抽吸涂片的自动铁染色过程。

Pub Date : 2024-09-01 Epub Date: 2024-05-21 DOI:10.1007/s12308-024-00586-7
Cara Lunn Shirai, Marianna B Ruzinova, Philip Barber, Elizabeth Bianchi, Julie M Ackerman, Tianjiao Wang, Shilah Parrish, John L Frater
{"title":"验证用于骨髓抽吸涂片的自动铁染色过程。","authors":"Cara Lunn Shirai, Marianna B Ruzinova, Philip Barber, Elizabeth Bianchi, Julie M Ackerman, Tianjiao Wang, Shilah Parrish, John L Frater","doi":"10.1007/s12308-024-00586-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The assessment of bone marrow iron stores is typically performed on an aspirate smear slide that has been manually stained by a technologist using a commercially available kit. This approach can contribute to inconsistent results and limit the broad use of iron staining in bone marrow specimens, particularly when laboratories have low staffing and/or high specimen volumes. Here, we describe the adaptation and validation of the Ventana Benchmark automated stainer and iron stain kit for routine clinical use of staining iron in bone marrow aspirate smear slides. We assessed accuracy and precision of the Ventana automated iron staining protocol compared to the Perls Prussian blue manual iron staining index method. Hematopathologists assigned Gale scores and enumerated the percentages of erythroid sideroblasts on paired patient bone marrow aspirate smear slides stained by the automated method and the manual iron staining method. We found a similar level of performance of the Ventana automated iron stain relative to the index manual method (as assessed by Pearson correlation and Bland-Altman analyses). In addition, there was low imprecision between replicates performed via the automated iron stain protocol. We also report superior qualitative findings of the automated method in ease of localization of iron storage, visualization of sideroblasts, and counterstain consistency. Automated iron staining of bone marrow aspirate smear slides performed similarly to the manual method and may allow for accurate routine evaluation of bone marrow iron stores as part of bone marrow analysis.</p>","PeriodicalId":0,"journal":{"name":"","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Validation of an automated iron stain process for use with bone marrow aspirate smear slides.\",\"authors\":\"Cara Lunn Shirai, Marianna B Ruzinova, Philip Barber, Elizabeth Bianchi, Julie M Ackerman, Tianjiao Wang, Shilah Parrish, John L Frater\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s12308-024-00586-7\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The assessment of bone marrow iron stores is typically performed on an aspirate smear slide that has been manually stained by a technologist using a commercially available kit. This approach can contribute to inconsistent results and limit the broad use of iron staining in bone marrow specimens, particularly when laboratories have low staffing and/or high specimen volumes. Here, we describe the adaptation and validation of the Ventana Benchmark automated stainer and iron stain kit for routine clinical use of staining iron in bone marrow aspirate smear slides. We assessed accuracy and precision of the Ventana automated iron staining protocol compared to the Perls Prussian blue manual iron staining index method. Hematopathologists assigned Gale scores and enumerated the percentages of erythroid sideroblasts on paired patient bone marrow aspirate smear slides stained by the automated method and the manual iron staining method. We found a similar level of performance of the Ventana automated iron stain relative to the index manual method (as assessed by Pearson correlation and Bland-Altman analyses). In addition, there was low imprecision between replicates performed via the automated iron stain protocol. We also report superior qualitative findings of the automated method in ease of localization of iron storage, visualization of sideroblasts, and counterstain consistency. Automated iron staining of bone marrow aspirate smear slides performed similarly to the manual method and may allow for accurate routine evaluation of bone marrow iron stores as part of bone marrow analysis.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":0,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12308-024-00586-7\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/5/21 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12308-024-00586-7","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/5/21 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

骨髓铁储存的评估通常是在抽吸涂片上进行的,而抽吸涂片是由技术人员使用市售试剂盒手工染色的。这种方法会导致结果不一致,限制骨髓标本铁染色的广泛应用,尤其是在实验室人员配备少和/或标本量大的情况下。在此,我们介绍了 Ventana Benchmark 自动染色机和铁染色试剂盒在临床常规骨髓穿刺涂片铁染色中的应用和验证。与佩尔斯普鲁士蓝人工铁染色指数法相比,我们评估了 Ventana 自动铁染色方案的准确性和精确性。血液病理学家对采用自动方法和手工铁染色方法染色的配对患者骨髓穿刺涂片进行盖尔评分,并计算红细胞中铁母细胞的百分比。我们发现,Ventana 自动铁染色法与指数手动法的性能水平相似(通过皮尔逊相关性和布兰德-阿尔特曼分析评估)。此外,通过自动铁染色方案进行的重复实验之间的不精确性也很低。我们还报告了自动方法在铁储存定位的简易性、高铁母细胞的可视化以及反染色的一致性等方面的优越定性结果。对骨髓抽吸涂片进行自动铁染色的效果与手动方法相似,可作为骨髓分析的一部分对骨髓铁储存进行准确的常规评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Validation of an automated iron stain process for use with bone marrow aspirate smear slides.

分享
查看原文
Validation of an automated iron stain process for use with bone marrow aspirate smear slides.

The assessment of bone marrow iron stores is typically performed on an aspirate smear slide that has been manually stained by a technologist using a commercially available kit. This approach can contribute to inconsistent results and limit the broad use of iron staining in bone marrow specimens, particularly when laboratories have low staffing and/or high specimen volumes. Here, we describe the adaptation and validation of the Ventana Benchmark automated stainer and iron stain kit for routine clinical use of staining iron in bone marrow aspirate smear slides. We assessed accuracy and precision of the Ventana automated iron staining protocol compared to the Perls Prussian blue manual iron staining index method. Hematopathologists assigned Gale scores and enumerated the percentages of erythroid sideroblasts on paired patient bone marrow aspirate smear slides stained by the automated method and the manual iron staining method. We found a similar level of performance of the Ventana automated iron stain relative to the index manual method (as assessed by Pearson correlation and Bland-Altman analyses). In addition, there was low imprecision between replicates performed via the automated iron stain protocol. We also report superior qualitative findings of the automated method in ease of localization of iron storage, visualization of sideroblasts, and counterstain consistency. Automated iron staining of bone marrow aspirate smear slides performed similarly to the manual method and may allow for accurate routine evaluation of bone marrow iron stores as part of bone marrow analysis.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信